task0778
Diamond Member
From Hunter Biden's laptop:
The Ukrainian energy company that was paying President Biden's son Hunter $1 million a year cut his monthly compensation in half two months after his father ceased to be vice president.
From May 2014, Burisma Holdings Ltd. was paying Hunter $83,333 a month to sit on its board, invoices on his abandoned laptop show.
But in an email on March 19, 2017, Burisma executive Vadym Pozharskyi asked Hunter to sign a new director's agreement and informed him "the only thing that was amended is the compensation rate."
"We are very much interested in working closely together, and the remuneration is still the highest in the company and higher than the standard director's monthly fees. I am sure you will find it both fair and reasonable."
After the email, the amount listed on Hunter's monthly Burisma invoices was reduced to $41,500, effective from May 2017.
Gee. Joe in office? The money flows. Joe out of office? Much less cash to be paid. Funny how that happens.
In 2017, Burisma was actually expanding operations, which doesn't happen to companies that are losing money, so it's unlikely that that pay cut was based on market conditions.
Coincidences, coincidences. It sounds as if maybe the company had less use for Hunter with old dad, "the big guy" as Hunter put it, out of office. No office, no influence — sorry, Hunter, you're just not as "expert" as Joe says now that Joe is out of office. Take this salary cut and be happy.
It's an old political game we've seen before, again and again: money flows from someplace to some downwind entity that appears legit whenever the Democrat in power is in office. Money ebbs when there is no influence to be bought.
Is this proof of wrong-doing, in and of itself? No. But it looks damning as hell. I was just wondering what Hunter's been doing lately, as he been hired onto a Board of directors again at around a mil/year, in an industry he knows absolutely nothing about and in a country he's never been to, and by a company he probably didn't even know existed before Daddy Joe got elected? I wouldn' be a bit surprised.
The Ukrainian energy company that was paying President Biden's son Hunter $1 million a year cut his monthly compensation in half two months after his father ceased to be vice president.
From May 2014, Burisma Holdings Ltd. was paying Hunter $83,333 a month to sit on its board, invoices on his abandoned laptop show.
But in an email on March 19, 2017, Burisma executive Vadym Pozharskyi asked Hunter to sign a new director's agreement and informed him "the only thing that was amended is the compensation rate."
"We are very much interested in working closely together, and the remuneration is still the highest in the company and higher than the standard director's monthly fees. I am sure you will find it both fair and reasonable."
After the email, the amount listed on Hunter's monthly Burisma invoices was reduced to $41,500, effective from May 2017.
Gee. Joe in office? The money flows. Joe out of office? Much less cash to be paid. Funny how that happens.
In 2017, Burisma was actually expanding operations, which doesn't happen to companies that are losing money, so it's unlikely that that pay cut was based on market conditions.
Coincidences, coincidences. It sounds as if maybe the company had less use for Hunter with old dad, "the big guy" as Hunter put it, out of office. No office, no influence — sorry, Hunter, you're just not as "expert" as Joe says now that Joe is out of office. Take this salary cut and be happy.
It's an old political game we've seen before, again and again: money flows from someplace to some downwind entity that appears legit whenever the Democrat in power is in office. Money ebbs when there is no influence to be bought.
So Hunter Biden took a big pay cut from Burisma after 'The Big Guy' lost office...
[See also Andrea Widburg's post on Joe Biden lying about his involvement with Burisma here.] Among the Bidens, coincidences abound. So sure enough, the New York Post, in its daily journalistic diggings, found this beaut from ...
www.americanthinker.com
Is this proof of wrong-doing, in and of itself? No. But it looks damning as hell. I was just wondering what Hunter's been doing lately, as he been hired onto a Board of directors again at around a mil/year, in an industry he knows absolutely nothing about and in a country he's never been to, and by a company he probably didn't even know existed before Daddy Joe got elected? I wouldn' be a bit surprised.