Would anyone like to discuss this remnant of a falsehood?

So........you didn't read the senator's explanations. Why do you run from these kinds of things? Is it because they destroy your fallacious beliefs?

Richard Burr, who is not running for reelection next year, said, in part, in a statement: “The President promoted unfounded conspiracy theories to cast doubt on the integrity of a free and fair election because he did not like the results. As Congress met to certify the election results, the President directed his supporters to go to the Capitol to disrupt the lawful proceedings required by the Constitution. When the crowd became violent, the President used his office to first inflame the situation instead of immediately calling for an end to the assault.”

He went on to say, “As I said on January 6th, the President bears responsibility for these tragic events. The evidence is compelling that President Trump is guilty of inciting an insurrection against a coequal branch of government and that the charge rises to the level of high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Therefore, I have voted to convict.”
If the evidence was compelling he wouldn’t of been exonerated
 
So........you didn't read the senator's explanations. Why do you run from these kinds of things? Is it because they destroy your fallacious beliefs?

Richard Burr, who is not running for reelection next year, said, in part, in a statement: “The President promoted unfounded conspiracy theories to cast doubt on the integrity of a free and fair election because he did not like the results. As Congress met to certify the election results, the President directed his supporters to go to the Capitol to disrupt the lawful proceedings required by the Constitution. When the crowd became violent, the President used his office to first inflame the situation instead of immediately calling for an end to the assault.”

He went on to say, “As I said on January 6th, the President bears responsibility for these tragic events. The evidence is compelling that President Trump is guilty of inciting an insurrection against a coequal branch of government and that the charge rises to the level of high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Therefore, I have voted to convict.”
There WAS no evidence. Dumbass. There was only hearsay.
 
Tl;dr.

And in any event, we’ve all seen too much about this Biden family criminality to buy whatever bug is now hoping to peddle.
And in any event, we’ve all seen too much unproven allegations about this Biden family criminality to buy whatever Repubs have been hoping to peddle.

Glad I could fix that for ya.

My fervent hope that one day you would substitute gratuitous insults with even a shred of factual material to bolster you claims once again fails to be realized. It's time to add you to my lengthy ignore list.
 
And in any event, we’ve all seen too much unproven allegations about this Biden family criminality to buy whatever Repubs have been hoping to peddle.

Glad I could fix that for ya.

My fervent hope that one day you would substitute gratuitous insults with even a shred of factual material to bolster you claims once again fails to be realized. It's time to add you to my lengthy ignore list.
Haha hunter is about to go on trial and you claim there is no evidence of xiden family criminality
 
If the evidence was compelling he wouldn’t of been exonerated
I'm sure I don't really have to explain that but..............Liz Cheney provides the perfect explanation. Those Repubs who are critical of trump are drummed out of the party or are voted out of office by The Following. All but one of the 7 who voted to convict did not have to face trump's adoring minions in a coming election. As I said before, it's why they felt able to vote based on the evidence, not their political future.
 
And in any event, we’ve all seen too much unproven allegations about this Biden family criminality to buy whatever Repubs have been hoping to peddle.

Glad I could fix that for ya.

My fervent hope that one day you would substitute gratuitous insults with even a shred of factual material to bolster you claims once again fails to be realized. It's time to add you to my lengthy ignore list.
Joe is not a nice man.
 
I'm sure I don't really have to explain that but..............Liz Cheney provides the perfect explanation. Those Repubs who are critical of trump are drummed out of the party or are voted out of office by The Following. All but one of the 7 who voted to convict did not have to face trump's adoring minions in a coming election. As I said before, it's why they felt able to vote based on the evidence, not their political future.
I’m sure yoj got some excuse, but the issue that Shifty and Liz had is, all they had was parody. And parody isn’t compelling
 
Quid Pro Joe.

I still see it being used here by the usual culprits. Its reference is not unique in the sense that many lies fabricated by the enormously influential right wing sound machine live on after being thoroughly debunked. Far too many to recount. In this particular instance, aided greatly by The Crazy in the House. Gym Jordan and James Comer were is always in the thick of it.

To those of you who use QPJ due to manufactured fables involving the "Big Guy" or other such nonsense.............

Dissecting GOP claims about Hunter Biden deals allegedly involving his father


— Comer, at the news conference
The phrase “evidence suggests” is doing a lot of work here. Comer is referring to a single email — dated May 13, 2017 — whose meaning has been under dispute. In the hard-drive copy of the laptop obtained by The Washington Post, the email lacked digital information that allowed it to be verified.
The Washington Post, in its reporting, cites only materials from the laptop that the security experts were able to verify or can be confirmed elsewhere. Politico reporter Ben Schreckinger, in his 2021 book “The Bidens,” said the email had been verified as authentic by “a person with independent access to Hunter’s emails.”

The 2017 email described possible ownership stakes for five partners, including Hunter Biden and his uncle Jim Biden, in a planned venture with CEFC, the Chinese company. The entity was to be called Oneida Holdings LLC.

James Gilliar, a business associate summarizing the allocation of the equity in Oneida Holdings LLC., in the email, wrote how four partners would get 20 percent each, except for Jim Biden, who would get 10 percent. He added a question: “10 held by H for the big guy?” One of the recipients of the mail, Anthony Bobulinski, has said that the “big guy” referred to Joe Biden and that “H” referred to Hunter. Bobulinski was a guest of Trump at one of the 2020 presidential debates.
But Gilliar told the Wall Street Journal in 2020: “I would like to clear up any speculation that former Vice President Biden was involved with the 2017 discussions about our potential business structure. I am unaware of any involvement at anytime of the former vice president. The activity in question never delivered any project revenue.”


Three days after the email was sent, a draft agreement setting up Oneida was circulated. It shows each partner would receive 20 percent, including Jim Biden. No mention is made of Joe Biden. The company agreement signed on May 22, 2017, had the same allocation. Oneida was to hold 50 percent of another corporate entity called SinoHawk. Neither Gilliar nor James Biden responded to requests for comment.

The Wall Street Journal said that it had reviewed corporate records and found no role for Joe Biden. The Washington Post, in an extensive report on the CEFC dealings, also did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC. The Biden campaign at the time denied he had any role.
Comer says that this deal involved natural gas, but he appears to be referring to a different transaction, described below. There is no evidence this particular deal concerned natural gas.

Collins said Comer had not made a mistake. “Committee Republicans have evidence the Bidens’ deal with CEFC — a company closely affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party — was changed when the Bidens cut out their Western partners of SinoHawk to keep the business in the family,” she said. Asked to provide the evidence, she would only say it was “based on whistleblower information provided to Committee Republicans.”

In an Oct. 13 letter to FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said that an FBI summary of an interview with Bobulinski revealed that the deal was intended to pay the partners for deals that had “remained intentionally uncompensated while Joe Biden was Vice President.” The venture failed but, in a separate arrangement, Hunter and Jim Biden received nearly $5 million from CEFC, Grassley noted.


.........I ask you this. Has it occurred to you yet that the entire made up "Joe was on the take" story was created as a counter narrative to things like this?

Trump Businesses Received $7.8 Million From Foreign Countries During Presidency, House Reports


Trump poised to run out political clock on emoluments suits


Karl Rove, the mastermind behind Shrub's campaigns, was known for taking a weakness his candidate had and making it a weakness for his opponent. Hence the Swift Boat liars for Bush was invented.

For trump backers, it was intolerable to have a candidate who stole money from a charity, defrauded students who paid to attend his joke of a real estate school, ripped off small contractors working on his properties, and declared multiple bankruptcies while leaving investors in his casinos holding the bag.

Just as it was intolerable for trump's record of serial sexual abuse to be out there without a distraction. Hence, Pedo Joe.

And finally, the big daddy of all the counter narratives. The entire nation's system of justice, even citizens called to sit on grand juries, were part of an orchestrated, all encompassing, pervasive conspiracy to get poor Don. In reality, the whole enterprise being designed to keep trumples from closely examining the publicly available, overwhelming evidence of his guilt. Or getting them to dismiss the evidence for being motivated, as the fatuous claim goes, by bias.

Don't care anymore. The country is done with your whole fucking crime family forever. Hopefully, Hunter will od and die shortly after Joe kicks the bucket. A bonus would be Jill committing suicide soon after, when the Ukraine money dries up.
 
Haha hunter is about to go on trial and you claim there is no evidence of xiden family criminality
He's already pled guilty, now daddy has to pardon him.
 
And in any event, we’ve all seen too much unproven allegations about this Biden family criminality to buy whatever Repubs have been hoping to peddle.

Glad I could fix that for ya.

You didn’t fix anything.

You’re just a simp.
My fervent hope that one day you would substitute gratuitous insults with even a shred of factual material to bolster you claims once again fails to be realized. It's time to add you to my lengthy ignore list.

Good. Please do. You’re a waste of electrons.

Gfy.

Best regards,

All who know you. 👍
 
From your linked article, here's something you forgot ;) to include..........

The bulk of the communication occurred in the lead-up to and following an agreement for Hunter Biden to serve on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma.

Earlier this year, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said in a news release that Schwerin told House Ways and Means Committee staff in a March interview that the elder Biden was not involved in the business of his son or any of his relatives.

Raskin said Schwerin stated that “he was not aware of any involvement by President Biden in the financial conduct of the President’s relatives’ businesses, much less any transactions into or out of the then-vice president’s bank account related to business conducted by any Biden family member.”


Hunter Biden business associate tells House Oversight Committee GOP allegations are 'preposterous'


Hunter Biden business associate tells House Oversight Committee GOP allegations are 'preposterous'

A Hunter Biden business partner, Eric Schwerin, has told a House panel he's "not aware of any financial transactions" then-VP Joe Biden received from any family business.
abcnews.go.com
abcnews.go.com

A longtime business partner of Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, said in a closed-door interview Tuesday with members of the House Oversight Committee that he is "not aware of any financial transactions or compensation" that then-Vice President Joe Biden received related to business conducted by this family members, calling the allegations "preposterous," according to Schwerin's opening statement obtained by ABC News.
Of course, Jamie raskin said..Hunter widens business associate said.

The evidence that was reported showed that Biden had made communication, as mentioned, up to and after the whole burisma thing, and Biden had pictures with hunters business partners. There are statements that Joe was on business calls.


Now, we don't have to discuss if any of that was illegal or not, but it does show that Joe lied. Again, put trump in this position, would you say he was guilty of something ? I believe you would.
 
Of course, Jamie raskin said..Hunter widens business associate said.

The evidence that was reported showed that Biden had made communication, as mentioned, up to and after the whole burisma thing, and Biden had pictures with hunters business partners. There are statements that Joe was on business calls.


Now, we don't have to discuss if any of that was illegal or not, but it does show that Joe lied. Again, put trump in this position, would you say he was guilty of something ? I believe you would.
Trump will tell you that taking a picture with someone means nothing
 
From your linked article, here's something you forgot ;) to include..........

The bulk of the communication occurred in the lead-up to and following an agreement for Hunter Biden to serve on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma.

Earlier this year, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said in a news release that Schwerin told House Ways and Means Committee staff in a March interview that the elder Biden was not involved in the business of his son or any of his relatives.

Raskin said Schwerin stated that “he was not aware of any involvement by President Biden in the financial conduct of the President’s relatives’ businesses, much less any transactions into or out of the then-vice president’s bank account related to business conducted by any Biden family member.”


Hunter Biden business associate tells House Oversight Committee GOP allegations are 'preposterous'


Hunter Biden business associate tells House Oversight Committee GOP allegations are 'preposterous'

A Hunter Biden business partner, Eric Schwerin, has told a House panel he's "not aware of any financial transactions" then-VP Joe Biden received from any family business.
abcnews.go.com
abcnews.go.com

A longtime business partner of Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, said in a closed-door interview Tuesday with members of the House Oversight Committee that he is "not aware of any financial transactions or compensation" that then-Vice President Joe Biden received related to business conducted by this family members, calling the allegations "preposterous," according to Schwerin's opening statement obtained by ABC News.
"Earlier this year, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said in a news release that Schwerin told House Ways and Means Committee staff in a March interview that the elder Biden was not involved in the business of his son or any of his relatives."
Dumbass! Just because Raskin said it does NOT mean it's true, moron!
 

Forum List

Back
Top