When do ICE agents start getting charged with murder?

[BackAgain]

I agree that there are agitators or agent provocateurs at those events. But what partisans are not getting is that the powers who control both sides of the uniparty are the ones orchestrating or instigating the chaos overall...

Nice conspiracy theory. Naturally, no hint of factual support for the silly claim.

Typical.

 

[Mick2]

I guess when Trump gets charged with murder too.

Biden and his goons already got their chance to weaponize the justice system against Trump. They got a mudhole stomped in them for it!

Don't you kooks ever learn?

 

[Correll]

The protests are a response to the untrained ICE goons engineering social unrest that was not happening before Don the Con began throwing red meat to his racist, MAGA base one year ago.

You ain't seen real protests yet.

But they are coming.

Your shit talk is dismissed.

My point stands. This is what you wanted. Indeed, you are already pushing for the next escalation.

So... yeah. I've been expecting all of this for quite some time. I am AMAZED that we go out of the ATTACKING CARS phase without a mass casuality event.

 

[Correll]

We don't any more. How many more do you Fascist Trump supporters want? Ya got two so far. Does that satisfy your bloodlust yet? Or no?

This wasn't my plan. It's clearly yours. YOu are the people sending large numbers of trained, professional agitators to confront and entrap large numbers of law enforcement officers during dangerous large scale operations.

For you to pretend to be shocked that someone managed to successfully provoke a violent response,

is you being dishonest, very, very dishonest.

 

[Clipper]

This wasn't my plan. It's clearly yours. YOu are the people sending large numbers of trained, professional agitators to confront and entrap large numbers of law enforcement officers during dangerous large scale operations.

For you to pretend to be shocked that someone managed to successfully provoke a violent response,

is you being dishonest, very, very dishonest.

Really? Who's paying them? Let me guess. Soros.

 

[Clipper]

View attachment 1211171

Some moron comes up with a meme. An idiot posts it here & thinks it's evidence.

No wonder why Trump gets away with the shit that he does.

 

[Correll]

Really? Who's paying them? Let me guess. Soros.

LIkely. But the way that the dems have been stealing and moving money around, who knows or cares.

The point stands. This has clearly been the plan for quite some time.


Question. When do republicans get to do policy?

 

[Clipper]

LIkely. But the way that the dems have been stealing and moving money around, who knows or cares.

The point stands. This has clearly been the plan for quite some time.


Question. When do republicans get to do policy?

When they elects someone who is sane & not a mobster to the W.H.

 

[Leo123]

Some moron comes up with a meme. An idiot posts it here & thinks it's evidence.

No wonder why Trump gets away with the shit that he does.

Come on Clippy, you guys have thousands of Trump memes. I post one on the Minneapolis criminal politicians and you have a hissy fit. Grow the F Up.

 

[Stann]

Man Killed by Federal Agents in Minneapolis Was Holding a Phone, Not a Gun​

Federal officials sought to portray a 37-year-old Minneapolis resident killed by Border Patrol agents on Saturday as a domestic terrorist, saying he wanted to “massacre” law enforcement, even as videos emerged that appeared to directly contradict their account.

The man, Alex Jeffrey Pretti, was an intensive-care nurse described by the Minneapolis police chief as a U.S. citizen with no criminal record. Federal officials said he was armed, but there is no sign in videos analyzed by The New York Times that he pulled his weapon, or that agents even knew he had one until he was already pinned on the sidewalk.

An agent had already removed Mr. Pretti’s gun when two other agents opened fire, shooting him in the back and as he lay on the ground. At least 10 shots were fired, killing him. Mr. Pretti had a legal permit to carry a firearm, said the police chief, Brian O’Hara.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/us/minneapolis-shooting-ice

In broad daylight a gang of heavily armed, masked men shot and killed an ICU nurse, Alex Pretti, who was trying to shield a woman from being pepper sprayed.

Officials from the regime said the nurse intended to attack federal agents, and that he was intent on a “massacre.” They presented no evidence.

As was the case with the murder of Renee Good, regime officials attempted to prevent state authorities from investigating.

According to Asst. AG Todd Blanche, no federal agencies are investigating Good's murder.

Two US citizens dead in Minneapolis. How many more?

Hopefully very soon.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

At BEST you could argue this is manslaughter. At BEST. Not murder in any degree.

But as I keep saying, I hope and pray Trump will pull ICE out and give all illegals in the US a certain amount of money to move to MN, then pull federal funds, since they don't want to comply with federal rules.

Bullshit. What do you think the logical result is of shooting someone who is on the ground 3 times in the back?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

and just like that the purple hair brigade love them some gun carriers.

gipper
Crepitus

What the hell are you talking about? Oh that's right you don't have a clue cause you're talking out of your rear.

Again.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Glad to see at least one trumple isn't in complete denial of reality.

That's still a bullshit assessment. Manslaughter is when you accidentally cause someone someone's death. This was not accidental, it was 100% intentional and in violation of when lethal force can be employed.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

If the charges aren't true, why do they need pardons?

So Trump would be giving pardons in anticipation of democrats following through on threats on fabricated charges.

What's the difference? Why is it ok for Biden but not Trump?

The difference is in intentionally violating the law with the anticipation that you will be absolved of all criminal/civil charges that may be brought against thereby allowing you to violate the law with impunity.

 

[Mick2]

This was not accidental, it was 100% intentional and in violation of when lethal force can be employed.

Says who?

The sane understand that impeding/obstructing/fighting with LE officers with a loaded handgun in your belt is a very, very bad idea with a likely lethal outcome. The deranged somehow believe otherwise so here we are.

 

[scruffy]

The difference is in intentionally violating the law with the anticipation that you will be absolved of all criminal/civil charges that may be brought against thereby allowing you to violate the law with impunity.

Oh. You mean like Biden and his idiotic border czar.

 

[Mac1958]

I hang at right leaning political message boards because left wing circle jerks seem to lack meaning. But I've noticed that members here are coming unglued lately. I wonder why?

I guess having to defend atrocities weighs heavy on their consciences.

I want very much to believe that, even if they don't/won't say it, they know that they have been conned, and that they have some idea of what they have enabled. I guess I don't want to just give up on their humanity.

No doubt though, the worst part of this is what it has told me about us as a country, a people. My guess is that what most of us are going through, and what is now hitting the world in general, is a grieving process.

 

[airplanemechanic]

That's still a bullshit assessment. Manslaughter is when you accidentally cause someone someone's death. This was not accidental, it was 100% intentional and in violation of when lethal force can be employed.

So just how much armed assault on a LEO is allowed before the cop can shoot someone?

By all means, since you're certified in determining when lethal force can be employed, enlighten us mere citizens with more detail.

 

[Dragonlady]

Supremacy clause.

Look it up. Get educated for once in your putrid life, stupid.

Maybe you SHOULD be looking it up because the "supremacy clause" doesn't say what you liars think it says.

There is no law, federal or state, which allows law enforcement to disarm a citizen and then murder him. The supremacy clause doesn't end the citizen's 2nd Amendment rights to legally carry a weapon.

You're the dumbest liar to every post on this board and that's saying a lot.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Maybe you SHOULD be looking it up because the "supremacy clause" doesn't say what you liars think it says.

There is no law, federal or state, which allows law enforcement to disarm a citizen and then murder him. The supremacy clause doesn't end the citizen's 2nd Amendment rights to legally carry a weapon.

You're the dumbest liar to every post on this board and that's saying a lot.

Did ICE go get him, or did he interfere with ICE? There is no law that allows an armed citizen to attack law enforcement.

OOPS. Kinda forgot that part, huh?

And YES, the supremacy clause absolutely protects federal LEO from state prosecution. LOOK IT UP *****.