What's the "Conservative" Answer?

Which market would be best for the USA and the world?

A) 6,000 Chinese Aristocrats with $7 Billion each to spend or

B) 7 Billion Chinese middle class with $60,000 each to spend?

What are the implications of the thought you just had there?!? :eek:

What's the "Conservative" Answer?

Tax cuts, naturally.
 
Rich folks create jobs.

Billy earns a billion dollars in a year. Billy, his wife and two kids create enough supermarket jobs to feed themselves. They also create enough pool and lawn service jobs to keep their mansion's looking nice.

If that billion dollars earned is split more or less evenly between 20,000 ppl into $50,000 per year you get 20,000 folks who need transportation and personal computers and the like.

Now honestly folks need the fear of starvation to keep them working. Folks also will work harder if we feel there is a probability of reward. So I AM a capitalist. Just one who believes countries with a middle class are better off.

Why would a rich folk bother creating a job for Billy unless he had a market place with disposable income to present the final product to?

Rich people do NOT create jobs. People with disposable income to spend create jobs.

Rich people just bankroll the building of the infrastructure of production - and they usually borrow the money for those projects rather than use their own.



It's time to let the religion of Trickle Down go the way of The Volcano God.

Perfectly worded.

Thank you!
 
Rich folks create jobs.

Billy earns a billion dollars in a year. Billy, his wife and two kids create enough supermarket jobs to feed themselves. They also create enough pool and lawn service jobs to keep their mansion's looking nice.

If that billion dollars earned is split more or less evenly between 20,000 ppl into $50,000 per year you get 20,000 folks who need transportation and personal computers and the like.

Now honestly folks need the fear of starvation to keep them working. Folks also will work harder if we feel there is a probability of reward. So I AM a capitalist. Just one who believes countries with a middle class are better off.

Demand creates jobs, not rich people.

The middle class drives the demand.

But sadly both our political parites are doing their best to eradicate the middle class
 
Which market would be best for the USA and the world?

A) 6,000 Chinese Aristocrats with $7 Billion each to spend or

B) 7 Billion Chinese middle class with $60,000 each to spend?

What are the implications of the thought you just had there?!? :eek:

What's the "Conservative" Answer?

Tax cuts, naturally.

The more things change, eh? :razz:






:lmao:
 
It's not funny though.....

When the wheels fall off of the Supply Side tax plan that Trump just signed and the bill comes due it ain't gonna be pretty.


Quick everyone!!! The Republicans just managed to get a several trillion dollar loan from our kids and grand kids!!

The time is ripe to get yer Monkey paw$ on $ome!



`
 
Rich folks create jobs.

Billy earns a billion dollars in a year. Billy, his wife and two kids create enough supermarket jobs to feed themselves. They also create enough pool and lawn service jobs to keep their mansion's looking nice.

If that billion dollars earned is split more or less evenly between 20,000 ppl into $50,000 per year you get 20,000 folks who need transportation and personal computers and the like.

Now honestly folks need the fear of starvation to keep them working. Folks also will work harder if we feel there is a probability of reward. So I AM a capitalist. Just one who believes countries with a middle class are better off.

Demand creates jobs, not rich people.

The middle class drives the demand.

But sadly both our political parites are doing their best to eradicate the middle class

Your first two sentences are correct, we are a consumer driven economy. Yet, the last sentence seem to be way off the mark. What can you point to, to suggest the Democratic Party has not supported the middle and working class Americans?
 
It's not funny though.....

When the wheels fall off of the Supply Side tax plan that Trump just signed and the bill comes due it ain't gonna be pretty.


Quick everyone!!! The Republicans just managed to get a several trillion dollar loan from our kids and grand kids!!

The time is ripe to get yer Monkey paw$ on $ome!



`

To put it into perspective though, and everything else stays even, the tax bill is estimated to cost something over $1 trillion over 10 years? Or a little over $100 billion per year over 10 years.

On President Obama's first day in office, the national debt was $10.626 trillion. On his last day in office, the national debt was more than $19,944 trillion. In other words, the Obama administration, without any tax cuts, added well over $1 trillion per YEAR to the national debt.

President Trump got maybe 1/4th of what he wanted in that tax bill. And I am quite sure, if he is given any chance at all and he continues to be successful in shaking up the status quo in Washington, we can hope that there is much more reform to come. On the other hand, what massive legislation ever stays the same over time? If problems develop, all Congress has to do is pass another bill that changes this one.

But how about we give it a chance to see what it will do for us first?
 
I'm o.k. with it.

I know how to make money on the Supply Side upswing and I'm just the right number of years away from retirement that I should be out by the time the bill comes due, but the carnage at the end is going to make 2008 - 2010 seem rosy by comparison, my humble prediction.
 
Which market would be best for the USA and the world?

A) 6,000 Chinese Aristocrats with $7 Billion each to spend or

B) 7 Billion Chinese middle class with $60,000 each to spend?

What's the "Conservative" Answer?

the answer is a little bit of both

who do you think is going to hire 7 billion Chinamen (which is a ridiculously high number) and pay them $60,000 each?
 
What can you point to, to suggest the Democratic Party has not supported the middle and working class Americans?

Obamacare.

Your ignorance has no boundaries. The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act is all about helping those who can't afford good health insurance, who have a serous medical condition and can't buy health insurance, and those whose insurance has dollar limits on series health problems.
 
It's not funny though.....

When the wheels fall off of the Supply Side tax plan that Trump just signed and the bill comes due it ain't gonna be pretty.


Quick everyone!!! The Republicans just managed to get a several trillion dollar loan from our kids and grand kids!!

The time is ripe to get yer Monkey paw$ on $ome!



`

To put it into perspective though, and everything else stays even, the tax bill is estimated to cost something over $1 trillion over 10 years? Or a little over $100 billion per year over 10 years.

On President Obama's first day in office, the national debt was $10.626 trillion. On his last day in office, the national debt was more than $19,944 trillion. In other words, the Obama administration, without any tax cuts, added well over $1 trillion per YEAR to the national debt.

President Trump got maybe 1/4th of what he wanted in that tax bill. And I am quite sure, if he is given any chance at all and he continues to be successful in shaking up the status quo in Washington, we can hope that there is much more reform to come. On the other hand, what massive legislation ever stays the same over time? If problems develop, all Congress has to do is pass another bill that changes this one.

But how about we give it a chance to see what it will do for us first?

How about not, Trump&Co. didn't reform anything, they simply did what the GOP has wanted for decades, a nation of the rich, by the rich and for the rich and global corporations.
 
Your ignorance has no boundaries. The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act is all about helping those who can't afford good health insurance, who have a serous medical condition and can't buy health insurance, and those whose insurance has dollar limits on series health problems.
That’s the problem with you commies. You have no foresight. We all knew Obamacare would raise premiums on the middle class like a motherfucker. We told you. You didn’t listen, or went forward intentionally.

The DNC cares only about the DNC. You are a naive child if you believe otherwise. Same with the GOP.
 
Your ignorance has no boundaries. The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act is all about helping those who can't afford good health insurance, who have a serous medical condition and can't buy health insurance, and those whose insurance has dollar limits on series health problems.
That’s the problem with you commies. You have no foresight. We all knew Obamacare would raise premiums on the middle class like a motherfucker. We told you. You didn’t listen, or went forward intentionally.

The DNC cares only about the DNC. You are a naive child if you believe otherwise. Same with the GOP.

I hope you didn't pay for the brainwashing, your ignorance on the issues was sufficient to convince you to drink the kool-aid.
 
It's not funny though.....

When the wheels fall off of the Supply Side tax plan that Trump just signed and the bill comes due it ain't gonna be pretty.


Quick everyone!!! The Republicans just managed to get a several trillion dollar loan from our kids and grand kids!!

The time is ripe to get yer Monkey paw$ on $ome!



`

To put it into perspective though, and everything else stays even, the tax bill is estimated to cost something over $1 trillion over 10 years? Or a little over $100 billion per year over 10 years.

On President Obama's first day in office, the national debt was $10.626 trillion. On his last day in office, the national debt was more than $19,944 trillion. In other words, the Obama administration, without any tax cuts, added well over $1 trillion per YEAR to the national debt.

President Trump got maybe 1/4th of what he wanted in that tax bill. And I am quite sure, if he is given any chance at all and he continues to be successful in shaking up the status quo in Washington, we can hope that there is much more reform to come. On the other hand, what massive legislation ever stays the same over time? If problems develop, all Congress has to do is pass another bill that changes this one.

But how about we give it a chance to see what it will do for us first?

How about not, Trump&Co. didn't reform anything, they simply did what the GOP has wanted for decades, a nation of the rich, by the rich and for the rich and global corporations.

Nice recitation of an assigned talking point while entirely non sequitur to the point I made.
 

Forum List

Back
Top