What's Bibi's point in addressing congress?

[irosie91]

I googled----yes----the Q source is thought to be a lost
text-----from which gospel writers drew their material
in writing the gospels-------Luke never met Jesus

 

[bendog]

no no no. You're right. Q is the supposed source of the 4 gospels. Although, as memory serves there's an alternative possibility for Luke. It doesn't matter at any rate.

and yeah, I've always assumed startrek stole "Q"

 

[bendog]

The most probable date for Luke-Acts is around 80-100 CE, the anonymous author using as his sources the Gospel of Mark, a sayings collection called Q, and some unique Lukan material called the L source.[5][6]


Gospel of Luke - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[High_Gravity]

He's running for POTUS in the next election.

 

[irosie91]

Getting back to the OP------it amazes me that there are
more than 1000 posts on this thread which is SUPPOSED
to be all about NETANYAHU's "point" in addressing
USA Congress----------FOR THE RECORD----IT SEEMS
TO ME THAT THE LOGICAL COURSE OF ACTION
MIGHT BE TO DISCUSS IT-----AFTER HE DELIVERS
HIS ADDRESS....... .....anyone???

 

[AvgGuyIA]

According to Rasmussen, voters support Netanyahu’s address to Congress over the objections of President Obama by a margin of 52 to 25%, with 23% undecided.

I would support impeaching Obama and Biden and installing Bibi as our President to finish his two years.

 

[irosie91]

According to Rasmussen, voters support Netanyahu’s address to Congress over the objections of President Obama by a margin of 52 to 25%, with 23% undecided.

I would support impeaching Obama and Biden and installing Bibi as our President to finish his two years.

you are not "average"

 

[bendog]

Getting back to the OP------it amazes me that there are
more than 1000 posts on this thread which is SUPPOSED
to be all about NETANYAHU's "point" in addressing
USA Congress----------FOR THE RECORD----IT SEEMS
TO ME THAT THE LOGICAL COURSE OF ACTION
MIGHT BE TO DISCUSS IT-----AFTER HE DELIVERS
HIS ADDRESS....... .....anyone???

Well, I started the thread to sort of hypothesize why Bibi was taking this step. Of course it has political implications for his own election, and yeah he hates Obama's guts (and the feeling's mutual) .... but imo there is more to it than that, and it's not just Obama's policy and Israel's policy. Imo it's fundamental. But yeah the thread got all twisted up with "Obama is weak" and "Bibi's a Nazi."

It's pretty tired at any rate.

 

[Dana7360]

The point is do we want them to have the capability to hit us? Plus it is in our interest to protect Israel.

They don't have that. If they were building ICBMs .... then that's another story.

They are.

You're going to need to provide some honest and credible proof of that.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

... snip ...
Our pathetic president alienating our allies and emboldening our enemies.

... snip...

While I hate to admit it, Im afraid Obama is part of God's plan. He is our Judas. He even compares the Christian Church to Islamic Terrorists.

 

[thanatos144]

Iran is sending satellites into space. Do any of you ignorant Jew hating idiots know what kind of tech that uses? The same kind that Icbms use. Iran has sais they will destroy the USA which they call the big Satan. So tell me is killing Jews worth killing us? Do you progressives even care?

 

[deltex1]

The point is do we want them to have the capability to hit us? Plus it is in our interest to protect Israel.

They don't have that. If they were building ICBMs .... then that's another story.

They are.

You're going to need to provide some honest and credible proof of that.

Iran Still on Track for 2015 ICBM Flight Test Washington Free Beacon

 

[AvgGuyIA]

[
DelTex, I know you really meant Obama doesn't have any balls. Real Americans have nothing in common with that Kenyan CIC-poser.

the he's not a real American ploy ...snore........

Being a real American is more than citizenship,

 

[Dana7360]

If anyone bothered to look at a thing we call a MAP they will see if anyone nukes Israel they are also nuking Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Saudi Arabia. They are also going to poison all nations that are downwind of the fall out. Which will mostly be Iraq and Iran.

Leaders in the middle east aren't going to nuke themselves. Israel will never be nuked. At least not by any leader of the nations around Israel.

All of this is the same garbage we have been hearing for decades and it's the same garbage we heard about Iraq from the bush boy and republicans.

It's nothing but garbage and the stupid people lap it up as if it's gospel.

By they way, where are those wmds?

 

[Jroc]

Yes...Bibi is man protecting his country. Obabble is a community organizer protecting his legacy.

hey, I'm not in favor of the US in a shooting war with Iran just because they have a capability to produce a nuclear bomb they might drop on Israel. And, I don't think a maj of Americans are either. Bibi and Obama have come to a fork in the road. Unlike any of his predecessors, Bibi is not demanding that the US actually attack someone.

Bibi may well have real concerns that the Obama deal is not enough to protect his country, but he has no biz trying to dictate or even influence what Americans believe is in their vital natl interests.

Bibi will not dictate, but he will inform and influence what Americans think with the facts rather than the BS we get from Obama.

Bibi is a prick to do it here two weeks before his own election. The timing is all wrong, in every possible way. Bibi will come out on the losing end of this.

An honest, clear thinking, liberal instead of those blindly siding with Obama. He tells it like it is when it comes to Iran. You have other priorities....

Dershowitz: On Iran, Obama Is Another Neville Chamberlain


The missile and its launch pad are "a direct threat to the United States as well," according to a 2013 U.S. intelligence report that stated that Iran could test an ICBM this year, according to the Post.

The Obama administration's "negotiations" are a joke, according to Dershowitz, who noted that even if Iran accepts the proposed deal — which some reports have said give Tehran 80 percent of what it wants — there's nothing to prevent them from developing "trigger mechanisms."

"All it stops them from doing, or it requires them to go underground to do it, is their centrifuges, and it allows them to remain a threshold nuclear power and it has a sunset prevision," Dershowitz said. "After a few years, the number has not been explicitly stated, they can go on and do whatever they please.

"This is a very bad deal, a bad deal for the United States, a bad deal for the international community."

Furthermore, Dershowitz said, the deal does not address Iran being the major exporter of terrorism.

"My fear is that whether it's this year or next year or 10 years from now, Barack Obama is going to go down in history as the (former British Prime Minister) Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century, if Iran ever does develop nuclear weapons.

"We will point to this point in history and say, this was the turning point. This was the point where the president could've recognized the greatest threat to the world in the 21st century and, like Chamberlain in the 20th century, he failed to do it. That will be his legacy if Iran develops nuclear weapons and the capacity to deliver them

.

Dershowitz Obama Fails to Recognize Iran Is Greatest Threat to World

 

[Statistikhengst]

Yes...Bibi is man protecting his country. Obabble is a community organizer protecting his legacy.

hey, I'm not in favor of the US in a shooting war with Iran just because they have a capability to produce a nuclear bomb they might drop on Israel. And, I don't think a majority of Americans are either. Bibi and Obama have come to a fork in the road. Unlike any of his predecessors, Bibi is not demanding that the US actually attack someone.

Bibi may well have real concerns that the Obama deal is not enough to protect his country, but he has no biz trying to dictate or even influence what Americans believe is in their vital natl interests.

Bibi will not dictate, but he will inform and influence what Americans think with the facts rather than the BS we get from Obama.

Bibi is a prick to do it here two weeks before his own election. The timing is all wrong, in every possible way. Bibi will come out on the losing end of this.

An honest, clear thinking, liberal instead of those blindly siding with Obama. He tells it like it is when it comes to Iran. You have other priorities....

Dershowitz: On Iran, Obama Is Another Neville Chamberlain


The missile and its launch pad are "a direct threat to the United States as well," according to a 2013 U.S. intelligence report that stated that Iran could test an ICBM this year, according to the Post.

The Obama administration's "negotiations" are a joke, according to Dershowitz, who noted that even if Iran accepts the proposed deal — which some reports have said give Tehran 80 percent of what it wants — there's nothing to prevent them from developing "trigger mechanisms."

"All it stops them from doing, or it requires them to go underground to do it, is their centrifuges, and it allows them to remain a threshold nuclear power and it has a sunset prevision," Dershowitz said. "After a few years, the number has not been explicitly stated, they can go on and do whatever they please.

"This is a very bad deal, a bad deal for the United States, a bad deal for the international community."

Furthermore, Dershowitz said, the deal does not address Iran being the major exporter of terrorism.

"My fear is that whether it's this year or next year or 10 years from now, Barack Obama is going to go down in history as the (former British Prime Minister) Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century, if Iran ever does develop nuclear weapons.

"We will point to this point in history and say, this was the turning point. This was the point where the president could've recognized the greatest threat to the world in the 21st century and, like Chamberlain in the 20th century, he failed to do it. That will be his legacy if Iran develops nuclear weapons and the capacity to deliver them

.

Dershowitz Obama Fails to Recognize Iran Is Greatest Threat to World

Neo-con non-thinking parrots like you have been squawking for the last 14 years that Iran is just months (or weeks) away from the bomb. Well, it never was. And I still isn't. And it is the current President, Obama, who has pushed for an gotten the hardest sanctions ever in history against Iran. But you will never give him credit for having tghe balls to do things that Bush was unwilling to do.

Really, your comprehension skills must be at the level of a kindergardner.

Am I supposed to be impressed when a douchebag like Alan Derschowitz gets more diarrhea of the mouth and needs to write more useless shit to make some $$ for himself? Nope.

Time for you to get a reality check and be a thinking Jew instead of a mina-bird.

 

[thanatos144]

If anyone bothered to look at a thing we call a MAP they will see if anyone nukes Israel they are also nuking Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Saudi Arabia. They are also going to poison all nations that are downwind of the fall out. Which will mostly be Iraq and Iran.

Leaders in the middle east aren't going to nuke themselves. Israel will never be nuked. At least not by any leader of the nations around Israel.

All of this is the same garbage we have been hearing for decades and it's the same garbage we heard about Iraq from the bush boy and republicans.

It's nothing but garbage and the stupid people lap it up as if it's gospel.

By they way, where are those wmds?

Because terrorists never use themselves as bombs right?

 

[TooTall]

Yes...Bibi is man protecting his country. Obabble is a community organizer protecting his legacy.

hey, I'm not in favor of the US in a shooting war with Iran just because they have a capability to produce a nuclear bomb they might drop on Israel. And, I don't think a maj of Americans are either. Bibi and Obama have come to a fork in the road. Unlike any of his predecessors, Bibi is not demanding that the US actually attack someone.

Bibi may well have real concerns that the Obama deal is not enough to protect his country, but he has no biz trying to dictate or even influence what Americans believe is in their vital natl interests.

Bibi will not dictate, but he will inform and influence what Americans think with the facts rather than the BS we get from Obama.

Bibi is a prick to do it here two weeks before his own election. The timing is all wrong, in every possible way. Bibi will come out on the losing end of this.

I find the argument Obama uses about protocol and Bibi speaking to Congress two weeks before the Israeli election absurd. Does anyone remember the so-called worldwide apology tour Obama made just before the 2008 election that he won in 2008? I rest my case.

 

[TooTall]

Yes...Bibi is man protecting his country. Obabble is a community organizer protecting his legacy.

hey, I'm not in favor of the US in a shooting war with Iran just because they have a capability to produce a nuclear bomb they might drop on Israel. And, I don't think a maj of Americans are either. Bibi and Obama have come to a fork in the road. Unlike any of his predecessors, Bibi is not demanding that the US actually attack someone.

Bibi may well have real concerns that the Obama deal is not enough to protect his country, but he has no biz trying to dictate or even influence what Americans believe is in their vital natl interests.

Bibi will not dictate, but he will inform and influence what Americans think with the facts rather than the BS we get from Obama.

Bibi is a prick to do it here two weeks before his own election. The timing is all wrong, in every possible way. Bibi will come out on the losing end of this.

An honest, clear thinking, liberal instead of those blindly siding with Obama. He tells it like it is when it comes to Iran. You have other priorities....

Dershowitz: On Iran, Obama Is Another Neville Chamberlain


The missile and its launch pad are "a direct threat to the United States as well," according to a 2013 U.S. intelligence report that stated that Iran could test an ICBM this year, according to the Post.

The Obama administration's "negotiations" are a joke, according to Dershowitz, who noted that even if Iran accepts the proposed deal — which some reports have said give Tehran 80 percent of what it wants — there's nothing to prevent them from developing "trigger mechanisms."

"All it stops them from doing, or it requires them to go underground to do it, is their centrifuges, and it allows them to remain a threshold nuclear power and it has a sunset prevision," Dershowitz said. "After a few years, the number has not been explicitly stated, they can go on and do whatever they please.

"This is a very bad deal, a bad deal for the United States, a bad deal for the international community."

Furthermore, Dershowitz said, the deal does not address Iran being the major exporter of terrorism.

"My fear is that whether it's this year or next year or 10 years from now, Barack Obama is going to go down in history as the (former British Prime Minister) Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century, if Iran ever does develop nuclear weapons.

"We will point to this point in history and say, this was the turning point. This was the point where the president could've recognized the greatest threat to the world in the 21st century and, like Chamberlain in the 20th century, he failed to do it. That will be his legacy if Iran develops nuclear weapons and the capacity to deliver them

.

Dershowitz Obama Fails to Recognize Iran Is Greatest Threat to World

Neo-con non-thinking parrots like you have been squawking for the last 14 years that Iran is just months (or weeks) away from the bomb. Well, it never was. And I still isn't. And it is the current President, Obama, who has pushed for an gotten the hardest sanctions ever in history against Iran. But you will never give him credit for ahving tghe balls to do things that Bush was unwilling to do.

Really, your comprehension skills must be at the level of a kindergardner.

Am I supposed to be impressed when a douchebag like Alan Derschowitz gets more diarrhea of the mouth and needs to write more useless shit to make some $$ for himself? Nope.

Time for you to get a reality check and be a thinking Jew instead of a mina-bird.

You absolutely adored Alan Derschowitz when he was dissing Bush is my bet. And he certainly did. What I can't figure out is Alan adored Clinton and has turned on Obama. My guess is Obama despises Bibi and attempts to dictate to Israel how they should agree to a two state solution and use the 1967 borders.

 

[Billo_Really]

...the current President, Obama, who has pushed for an gotten the hardest sanctions ever in history against Iran...

Why are there sanctions against Iran, they haven't done anything wrong?