impuretrash
Gold Member
- Aug 31, 2017
- 11,029
- 2,945
- 290
National Geographic is a respected magazine and if you ever read it you would know their articles are well researched and include footnotes to all evidence citedThat's all that ever mattered. It's why whitres have 15 times the wealth of everybody else.I thought MLK's dream was that people be judged by the content of their character not the color if their skin.As the King holiday is upon us, it is once again time to reflect on Dr. Kings life and what it meant. What it really meant, not the one sentence those on the right haves made his life out to mean. Some on the right would claim that King would oppose BLM based on the government propaganda they chose to believe about them.
But King's main point was-
BLACK LIVES MATTER JUST AS MUCH AS WHITE LIVES AND WE DEMAND THAT OUR LIVES BE GIVEN EQUAL RESPECT.
View attachment 444059
Martin Luther King I Have a Dream Speech - American Rhetoric
We have not seen that flood from the mighty stream yet. And no matter what a few sellouts think, this is the reality in which blacks and ALL PEOPLE OF COLOR live in. We are now into the third decade of the 21st century, it is time for us in America to stop pretending and stop lying to ourselves about reality in order to make a specific group of people feel good or comfortable. Either we all feel comfortable or no one does until this mess ends. America has not reached the point of judging people of color by the content of our character. When you read whites complaining about affirmative action while always making claims about the less qualified person of color, that is an example of how the contwnt of character is ignored.
When people talk about blacks being on a democrat plantation, this claim is not based on content of character. When blacks echo white racist beliefs and defends white supremacy it is an example of immoral character and not a black person living the belief in content of character.
I was alive when King lived and saw how he was hated by whites. To hear white “conservative” republicans tell it, King was widely accepted and loved by the white community. King was called everything whites call blacks who oppose white racism continuing today. I know because I heard them saying it. King was loved so much for his dignity, non-violence and responsibility that “conservative” whites claim to champion that a white man ended his life using ultimate violence. And now whites want to try telling us what King stood for. Ain't that about a.........
This type of lunacy believed by a section of the white community created a fictional, docile, sellout King. King took bullets and gave his life fighting to end white racism. A great man once said,” No man has a greater love than is, that he lay down his life for his friends.” King did that. That was the content of his character.
It seems to me that all that matters today is the color of one's skin
Kings dream was the end of white racism. Whites like you love trotting out that line when whites get held accountable for the racism they continue to exhibit.
There is no scientific basis for the concept of race the fact that people still cling to the idea that races are anything but a man made concept we will never progress towards a society where race doesn't matter
Sorry but that's ridiculous. There are biological differences between the races. Not only is it obvious even to a small child, It is in your DNA and in your bone structure.There’s no scientific basis for race—it's a made-up label
It's been used to define and separate people for millennia. But the concept of race is not grounded in genetics.www.nationalgeographic.com
read and learn
Open your eyes and stop being a pussy. Or are you really gonna sit there and tell me you can't tell the difference between an african tribesman and a chinese peasant?
And yet those 2 people have insignificant genetic differences.
The heart from a Chinese peasant will not be rejected if surgically implanted into an African tribesman.
Read the article and learn something
I can do without the politically correct pseudo science. Let's get real. You said there's no scientific basis for the concept of race. Can race be determined by DNA and bone structure or no? Is biology no longer a science?
But go ahead and remain ignorant if you want . It's no skin off my back
There's a lot of money that goes into studies to "disprove race". It's a political agenda not one based in the pursuit of actual truth. Actual race science that goes against the narrative is censored because it reveals certain truths that PC numbnuts just cannot allow to see the light of day.
You still haven't answered my question. Can race be determined via DNA and bone structure?
All that can be determined genetically is that you have genes that affect the amount of melanin your body produces.
and environment has the most effect the evolution of skin color.
There never has been a pure White, Black or Asian Race and in fact ALL humans are genetically traced to Africa and the differences we see between people are more a result of environment and the fact that people were breeding within these different environments.
How much do you want to bet there are white people in your family tree? On average Blacks in the US are all at least 30% White so you're not even a member of the Black race as you define it you are like all of us a mix
This is science, this is anthropology, biology and genetics.
Race is a social construct
I'll bet you 100 bucks there are white people in my family tree. I am white, after all. So is my entire extended family haha. Anyway, maybe you're unaware but nowadays with a simple cotton swab you can send your DNA to be analyzed and a week or two later receive a detailed report about your ethnic ancestry.
Race is not a social construct. It is the product of tens of thousands of years of humans adapting to vastly different climates, diets and lifestyles. Race is so much more than skin deep and the proof is in the pudding: certain races tend to excel at sports more than others. But those are not the differences we're worried most about. Differences in temperament and intelligence are the most scary. That's why true science regarding race is now verboten.
Where is your science to support your claims.
Geneticists and anthropologists disagree with you. So guess who I'm going to believe.
If the experts tell you down is up and up is down, would you believe them? If your own eyes cannot be trusted, what of the annals of human history? Why is it that despite being here longer than any other breed of human, native africans still live in mud huts to this very day? Are you really going to pretend that African Pygmies and Australian Aborigines are no different to Ashkenazi Jews, no different to Icelandic people? Give me a break!