- Aug 5, 2021
- Reaction score
- Southern Jersey
Okay, let's try it this way:
NOTHING King's speech supports or justify's what you said. In order to do so, one would have to excerpt bits and parts of it and then pretend the rest of the speech didn't exist. It's called taking things out of context ... a tactic used by most propagandist great & small.
Now, since YOU made the claim and doubled down on it in exchanges with others, the burden of proof is on you. That's how it works in a debate...just ask any high school English teacher running the Debate Team. So either you can factually prove what you say with actual links or quotes or both, or you're just another David Duke wanna be posting your mental flatulence. Carry on.
MLK stated that millions of dollars can be spent every day to hold troops in South Viet Nam and our country cannot protect the rights of Negroes in Selma.
MLK said that after getting civil rights, he sounded racist. He fought for civil rights, right? They had civil rights. He got what he wanted and started to show his true colors. He was, like don't send his people to war but send mine?