Solving for simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States; not dumb enough for the right wing?There is no provision for Excuses in the federal doctrine, Only the Republican Doctrine.not very relevant. more like special pleading. EDD could handle it.
Not relevant? All 5 questions point to the ridiculousness of your idea. Until you have answers to those questions, it is very obvious that UC would not help. But you say it is not relevant?
Here is the definition of "Special Pleading":
from: Special Pleading
"Description: Applying standards, principles, and/or rules to other people or circumstances, while making oneself or certain circumstances exempt from the same critical criteria, without providing adequate justification. Special pleading is often a result of strong emotional beliefs that interfere with reason."
Nothing I said fits the description of that fallacy. So in addition to refusing to answer valid questions, you make up shit to disparage what I have said.
Just answer the questions or admit UC is not an answer for homelessness.
He is wrong, he know he is, he hasn’t got that part figured out and can’t admit it, it is an angle he hasn’t thought of, that and how to support an additional 3.1 trillion in added spending, according to his figures.
Tell that to a republican, you have serious hurdles to overcome and you refuse to directly answer any of the questions. How are we to take you seriously without the facts?
Quit trolling, either put up or shut up.