I use the post office a lot and most of the time, it goes fine. For some reason, mailing things from the Midwest to southern states takes a long time and have had packages get lost. I like UPS and find them dependable most of the time, though hate the way they don't have you sign for packages every time. I notice that I only sign for packages the first time at a new address, then they must use the same signature after that to give the illusion that I signed for something. Fed Ex is the worst and I refuse to use them at all.
Problem with the post office is that people aren't sending letters the way they used to because of email and text messaging. Letters were the biggest source of income and now it's mostly about packages and junk mail or magazines. Since a lot of people prefer other companies for packages, that leaves mostly bulk mail and magazines for the post office, so the amount of mail delivery is no where near the volume it once was. With so many public employees retired and good pay and benefits promised to current employees, it's hard to keep up enough income to cover everything. That is true with any public employees. The cost raises each year as some retire and draw pensions while new ones are hired to take their place. They all rely on tax dollars and income from postage. It's no surprise that rates have increased for shipping everything. If the post office doesn't take in enough money from postage costs to cover daily operations, pay and pensions, it must come from tax payers.
I'd rather see an increase in costs for actually using services than taxes being increased.
Bottom line is that with less mail being sent, less employees are needed. It only makes sense to cut hours at the post office and not hire more people than they need. Otherwise, we have people getting paid when there isn't enough work to keep them busy.
Government often spends more money on things than is needed and it's just a waste. A lot of military people just got cut despite being good at what they did. It's no different with any other government employee. If you're not needed, there is no reason to keep you.
Bottom line is that with less mail being sent, less employees are needed.
whats needed is more people who actually touch the Mail,and less of those who dont....
It only makes sense to cut hours at the post office
that is easier said than done in that business....
and not hire more people than they need
when i retired they had not hired new Carriers,the District i was in anyway....in 7 years.....and they were needed.....plenty of managers though.....
Otherwise, we have people getting paid when there isn't enough work to keep them busy.....
you just described Middle Management in the PO.....only they make themselves busy concocting something up that makes everyone who actually touches the mail.....Geezus dont get me started....you would have to have worked in one for at least 3 Months to appreciate what im saying....
Way back in the day,I was given projects to do what used to be called "bulk mail" We'd get #3 white canvas bags and fill them full of bundled mail sorted by zip code. The nice thing was that they were financial mailings so most were going to financial centers so we could get a lot of 3/5 digit sorts.
What you said is right. We have fewer mail pieces so it would make perfect sense to cut the # of people needed. One of the things I wanted to do in the thread was to see what the GOP backers here would say about attacking what turns out to be a triple whammy....
A large union presence
A large minority presence
A "life line" support agency for the aged and aging.
It reminds me of the Romney attack on PBS. We're $17T in debt and we're still sponsoring television and radio nobody wants to listen to or pay for. It's freaking crazy. But the Dems were able to lampoon Romney for suggesting he'd take Big Bird off the air.