Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do you believe that to be the case?I agree. However.. It doesn't seem to be the case that they didn't build it.
You are alleging the US collaborated with China on bioweapons research while the right-wing was insisting on having a trade war with China. Only the right-wing would be that cognitively dissonant.Ummm.. No. Not "Right-wingers"... People who are actually following and looking at the evidence. Nobody... I say again.. NOBODY is saying we didn't fund this in the past. What is being said now, is that it wasn't funded after the ban.
You need valid arguments not unsubstantiated opinion.I agree. I say it again... You are wrong. You can look this stuff up. Hell, there is another thread on it right now. I suggest you watch that video.
Basic research would be more likely for any potential "complacency". I can imagine sirens and lights flashing to remind people of the security concerns for bioweapons research that could be that deadly.Yes... Which is likely why they chose China... Let them take the risk was likely the thinking behind it. I don't know that. Personally, I don't think it should be funded at all.
No one has stated basic research is not dangerous. It was why there were safety procedures and personal protective equipment as "standard practice" for it. Right-wingers would have us believe we are good allies with the Chinese and were Collaborating on bioweapons research, and the trade war was "just for fun".Nobody is saying that pandemics can't happen without human interference. Straw man. What is being said, is that this one did not. There is evidence that shows it did not. Your arguments here did not dent that at all. Please read post #28 that I posted like 20 minutes before this one.
umm.. what you just quoted. It's the response, to what you just said.No one has stated basic research is not dangerous. It was why there were safety procedures and personal protective equipment as "standard practice" for it. Right-wingers would have us believe we are good allies with the Chinese and were Collaborating on bioweapons research, and the trade war was "just for fun".
No one is claiming basic research may not be dangerous. It is why safety protocols are important.
Story from 2011... If it's found it came from a lab... Doesn't matter if we funded it or not... He's CLEARLY wrong.
How did they come up with a vaccine so quickly if basic research is not useful?"GoF experiments have neither prevented a pandemic, nor provided useful information about safe and effective pandemic countermeasures.
Sure. Accidents happen. The Spanish flu originated in the US not China.Do you believe China is the correct place to run such a thing?
Can you explain what you mean? I got vaccinated just like for anything else vaccines are good for.The one that isn't treated like any other vaccine?
*blink*blink*Sure. Accidents happen. The Spanish flu originated in the US not China.
Your statement implies that the derived concoction (various) was optimal. The trouble they've had is determining that second jab with timing...now articles out about less dosage having same effectiveness. Yeah, they'll continue to tweak with boosters (now saying 8 months looks like average time for antibodies to continue to protect from more severe reaction/illness), change course if needed perhaps.How did they come up with a vaccine so quickly if basic research is not useful?
If something would have went wrong... You can't sue the company that made the vaccine. The FDA has not given it the green light to be treated like any other drug. Thus the Emergency Use Authorization.Can you explain what you mean? I got vaccinated just like for anything else vaccines are good for.
It either occurred naturally or it must have been an accident.*blink*blink*
Ok. I disagree. I'm sure the people who ACTUALLY believe that Covid killed 3 million people should be all over your ass here shortly for calling this an "accident". But... I don't think they actually believe that.
I only claim that vaccines have been effective at mitigating pandemics.Your statement implies that the derived concoction (various) was optimal.