Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Daszak and Fauxi are butt buddies.....Of course they'll cover one another's tracks.Researcher Tied to Wuhan Lab Thanked Fauci for Dismissing Lab-Leak Theory
Peter Daszak thanked Anthony Fauci for pushing back on the theory that the coronavirus leaked from a lab.news.yahoo.com
Fact is that Trump had no input....This shit is all on your Saint Tony....Period, full stop.
Researcher Tied to Wuhan Lab Thanked Fauci for Dismissing Lab-Leak Theory
Peter Daszak thanked Anthony Fauci for pushing back on the theory that the coronavirus leaked from a lab.news.yahoo.com
Your own link... Does not support what you just said.
How about the kickbacks from the upcoming war? The media did try pretty hard to drum up something against Iran... Instead of war, Trump just killed one of their top generals. But a war is coming... Without a leader that doesn't want war... It's coming.My guess would be that a lot of politicians and bureaucrats were getting a lot of money kicked back to them for their part in procuring funding for this evil bullshit. I also believe Communist China intended to use it as a weapon to damage the US and others.
Fact. Doesn't suggest that Trump had anything to do with it. Does a general go to prison because a jarhead rapes someone? No. He had nothing to do with that. It just reflects badly on him. That's fair... But to suggest that he warranted it... Makes you an idiot.It was done under Trump. Fact.
After WWl the Geneva Convention banned Biological weapons.
So, why did Dr Fauci fund the Covid "gain of function" in China?
Why did he choose China out of the 195 countries?
What was the real purpose of the research?
Was it "worth the risk"?
Should their be a international trial for Dr Fauci and China?
The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), or Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use.[5] The treaty's full name is the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction.[5]
Fauxi is a borderline war criminal....He should be in prison.I think Fauci should be fired. I don't make excuses for those who failed.
and, of course, today's Democrats seek political power in order to reap economic profits, too.
The Clintons perfected the system of enriching themselves through the political system via the enormous sums they were given for speaking engagements by those their political policies enriched. Today, it is million dollar Hunter Biden art work, but the process is the same.
Thanks for the link-so if I'm reading your linked article this right with respect to an independent committee review, utilized by NIH in part, to weigh whether or not the risk is lower than benefit factor for numerous areas of research, but vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance were deemed "off limits" for this new team of independent advisory board for NIH? No f way. Sorry. That was extreme for me but good for emphasis in this deserving case.Fauxi IS NIH.....That was nobody's decision but his.
Can you define "gain of function" and tell us how that was accomplished?After WWl the Geneva Convention banned Biological weapons.
So, why did Dr Fauci fund the Covid "gain of function" in China?
Why did he choose China out of the 195 countries?
What was the real purpose of the research?
Was it "worth the risk"?
Should their be a international trial for Dr Fauci and China?
The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), or Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use.[5] The treaty's full name is the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction.[5]
Can you define "gain of function" and tell us how that was accomplished?
Researching gain of function for greater understanding is not the same as designing gain of function for a virus. Basic research is not the same as applied research. How else can scientists discover a "cure for the common cold" without basic and fundamental research?
Edit: Full disclosure... I didn't read the whole thing. I just read the start to make sure it was correct.
I agree. However.. It doesn't seem to be the case that they didn't build it.Researching gain of function for greater understanding is not the same as designing gain of function for a virus. Basic research is not the same as applied research. How else can scientists discover a "cure for the common cold" without basic and fundamental research?
Ummm.. No. Not "Right-wingers"... People who are actually following and looking at the evidence. Nobody... I say again.. NOBODY is saying we didn't fund this in the past. What is being said now, is that it wasn't funded after the ban.In virology, gain-of-function research is employed with the intention of better understanding current and future pandemics.[4] In vaccine development, gain-of-function research is conducted in the hope of gaining a head start on a virus and being able to develop a vaccine or therapeutic before it emerges.[4] The term "gain of function" is sometimes applied more narrowly to refer to "research which could enable a pandemic-potential pathogen to replicate more quickly or cause more harm in humans or other closely-related mammals."[5][6]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain-of-function_research
Right-wingers would like to have us believe that the US is on good enough terms with China to pursue design of gain of function on viruses and potential bioweapons yet, they also have a problem with China and started a "trade war".
I agree. I say it again... You are wrong. You can look this stuff up. Hell, there is another thread on it right now. I suggest you watch that video. Edit: And ... Umm... It's not exactly right wing people we are talking about here either. TRUMP had problems with China. Republicans and Democrats don't for some reason.“Gain-of-function” is the euphemism for biological research aimed at increasing the virulence and lethality of pathogens and viruses.
Only the cognitive dissonance of right-wing fantasy would justify that line of reasoning. True, basic research sounds more credible. Or, was Steve Bannon on a Chinese yacht to help with "gain of function"? Collaborating on bioweapons research with China seems literally incredible when considering right-wing antagonism toward China.
Yes... Which is likely why they chose China... Let them take the risk was likely the thinking behind it. I don't know that. Personally, I don't think it should be funded at all.Furthermore, if it was design of gain of function, wouldn't that have been even more reason for greater safety measures and more alertness than for basic research leading to "complacency"?
Nobody is saying that pandemics can't happen without human interference. Straw man. What is being said, is that this one did not. There is evidence that shows it did not. Your arguments here did not dent that at all. Please read post #38 that I posted like 20 minutes before this one.And, the Spanish flu originated in the US with no apparent research into gain of function. And, historical plagues had no research into the gain of function, yet were still deadly to the populations involved.