What was the purpose of the "gain of function" research?

TroglocratsRdumb

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2017
35,366
44,622
2,915
After WWl the Geneva Convention banned Biological weapons.
So, why did Dr Fauci fund the Covid "gain of function" in China?
Why did he choose China out of the 195 countries?
What was the real purpose of the research?
Was it "worth the risk"?
Should their be a international trial for Dr Fauci and China?


The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), or Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use.[5] The treaty's full name is the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction.[5]
 

What was the purpose of the "gain of function" research?​

They have already said... Just ... Not directly. They are trying to cure cancer. But it's going to be used as a last resort, because it's a bullshit answer. It's a fuck they got me, this is the last defense of what were doing kind of thing.
 
Fauci may have also been trying to gain financially through pharmaceutical profits
and, of course, today's Democrats seek political power in order to reap economic profits, too.

The Clintons perfected the system of enriching themselves through the political system via the enormous sums they were given for speaking engagements by those their political policies enriched. Today, it is million dollar Hunter Biden art work, but the process is the same.
 
and, of course, today's Democrats seek political power in order to reap economic profits, too.

The Clintons perfected the system of enriching themselves through the political system via the enormous sums they were given for speaking engagements by those their political policies enriched. Today, it is million dollar Hunter Biden art work, but the process is the same.

The stop on research was lifter under Trump. Why? Because it was enacted under Obama.

No, the research is not worth it.
 
Perhaps the Chinese released the virus to stop Trump’s reelection.

Trump was setting back the Chinese plans to rule the world by decades and China owned Joe Biden. It was an easy decision for the cold blooded rulers of China.

1627143632193.jpeg
 
That doesn't make any sense... Who lifted it? The people who put a stop to it... They should be the ones to lift it. Not the people it was placed upon.

Edit: Unless of course they placed it on themselves. In which case... Obama really had nothing to do with anything. Same with Trump.
Perhaps someone got paid off by the Chinese.

The latest modern version of the Art of War says,

If possible buy your enemies‘ officials and bureaucrats so you can take over their nation without a war.
 
That doesn't make any sense... Who lifted it? The people who put a stop to it... They should be the ones to lift it. Not the people it was placed upon.

Edit: Unless of course they placed it on themselves. In which case... Obama really had nothing to do with anything. Same with Trump.

Of course it made no sense. Very little under Trump did.
 
After WWl the Geneva Convention banned Biological weapons.
So, why did Dr Fauci fund the Covid "gain of function" in China?
Why did he choose China out of the 195 countries?
What was the real purpose of the research?
Was it "worth the risk"?
Should their be a international trial for Dr Fauci and China?


The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), or Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use.[5] The treaty's full name is the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction.[5]

This is the best research I have found.

Folks on the left and right should agree, this guy is pretty reliable, he is, ostensibly an "establishment" journalist, but tends to protest and do real journalism.


This piece was from WAY back in April 24, 2020, when most of the MSM were calling the lab leak a "conspiracy theory," he was explaining what gain of function was, way out ahead of the curve.

Did this virus come from a lab? Maybe not — but it exposes the threat of a biowarfare arms race​


Another piece by him. . .


 
It's not an excuse, jackass, it's the fact of the matter.

Facts are the hold on research was lifted under Trump. This is what Trump did. if Obama did something, Trump was going to do the opposite.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top