What to do With Occupied Germany?

A war crime of the USA. Without declaration of war you used private ships to bring weapons to England, which was in war with Germany.
Neutrals can sell to anyone. Sweden and Switzerland did massive sales to Germany during the war especially of military items that Germany couldn't source elsewhere and rare raw materials for the German war industry. For that matter Russia made WWII possible for Germany by allowing the Germans to conduct banned military training and research inside the USSR under the veil of the communist country AND providing Germany with the raw material, food and fuel necessary to invade western Europe. Not to mention conspiring with Germany to invade Poland and divvy up Eastern Europe between Germany and the USSR.
 
To be fair, the Nazis, ham-fisted as they were, produced some first-rate propaganda. Fritz Hippler and Leni Reifenstahl were very good technical directors, despite the vile content they produced.

But, German propaganda isn't limited to The Nazis.

For example,

" Nicht durch Reden und Majoritätsbeschlüsse werden die großen Fragen der Zeit entschieden — daß ist der große Fehler von 1848 und 1849 gewesen — sondern durch Eisen und Blut. "

-- Otto Von Bismarck

"Vergessen Sie nicht Ihre großen Waffen, die die angesehensten Argumente für die Rechte der Könige sind."

-- Frederick the Great
Excellent examples. Maybe. I don’t know. I don’t read or speak or understand German.
 
Neutrals can sell to anyone. Sweden and Switzerland did massive sales to Germany during the war especially of military items that Germany couldn't source elsewhere and rare raw materials for the German war industry. For that matter Russia made WWII possible for Germany by allowing the Germans to conduct banned military training and research inside the USSR under the veil of the communist country AND providing Germany with the raw material, food and fuel necessary to invade western Europe. Not to mention conspiring with Germany to invade Poland and divvy up Eastern Europe between Germany and the USSR.

Inconvenient truths that many chose to ignore.

The US was Neutral until 1941, when Germany declared war against the US. The US was even neutral in WWI, until after an almost-war the US gave an ultimatum to Germany to stop attacking neutral shipping. Germany's response was to attempt to convince Mexico to attack the US, an act of war that resulted in the US joining against them.

And it always amazes me that more people are not aware of the Kama Tank School, the Lipetsk Fighter-Pilot School, and the Tomka Gas Test Site. All three joint German-Soviet programs conducted in the Soviet Union in order to help both sides develop better weapons and tactics. All done to circumvent the demilitarization provisions placed on Germany after WWI.

But yes, neutral nations can in fact sell to anybody. That is a key part of "Neutrality" in the first place. That was a key factor in Spain remaining Neutral in WWII. While nominally a satellite of Germany, they were also completely reliant on imports from the US (mostly fuel, oil, and coal) so it was either remain neutral or their lights would go out and their people would starve. And there was no way that Germany could have made up those shortfalls if Spain did join them in the war.

And there was actually communication between Spain and Germany informing them of when shipments of supplies from the US were arriving and warnings to not attack them. And Germany let them pass almost completely unmolested because the last thing they wanted was to piss off Spain and have them join in the war against them. Just like Japan allowed supplies sent to the Soviets by the US to pass unmolested, because they did not want the Soviets to join in the fight against them.

Nations at war violate neutrality at great risk, because doing so can have impacts far beyond the expected. Even causing other neutral nations impose embargos or even joining in against them for fear that they might be next. Look no farther than the number of nations that had been neutral since the end of WWII suddenly joining NATO from fear of the recent Russian expansionism.
 
Neutrals can sell to anyone.

Everyone can sell to everyone and buy from everyone.

Sweden and Switzerland did massive sales to Germany during the war especially of military items that Germany couldn't source elsewhere and rare raw materials for the German war industry.

What's first of all nonsense and secondly totally uninteresting. 2/3rd of the Swiss are for example Germans - more concrete: Allemani.

For that matter Russia made WWII possible for Germany by allowing the Germans to conduct banned military training and research inside the USSR under the veil of the communist country AND providing Germany with the raw material, food and fuel necessary to invade western Europe.

You are a totally weird idiot who has not any idea about real history.

Not to mention conspiring with Germany to invade Poland

It is totally clear what Stalin and Hitler did do in the secret part of the Molotow-Ribbentrop pact. They decided to ignore the results of World War 1 and liked to seperate Poland again. I guess Stalin did do so on imperial and colonialistic reasons and Hitler did do so on reason to be able to eliminate Stalin more easily.

and divvy up Eastern Europe between Germany and the USSR.

Hitler liked ot conquer whole Europe, Russia and the whole world. He never had stopped. I guess he liked to be the greatest German of all times and the greatest artist who created with the brushes terror and war the greatest artwork which ever had been done. The problem: He was not really a good artist but only a great narcissist.

You fought for the devil Stalin against the satan Hitler - and you are still proud that you did do so. What you ignore is that you on your own created Hitler and Stalin in World War 1 and you created also the current situation now in World War 2. Welcome back to your cold war which soon will be able to become a hot war. But what a luck that you know again who is guilty - now has to follow only the next step to punish the innocent so you can be "great again".
 
Last edited:
The US was Neutral until 1941 ...

Transposed digits: 1914. I'm sure if you not had been part of World War 1 the colonial-imperialist national concepts had lost (England, France, Russia, ...) and the multi-national union concepts had won (Germany, Austria-Hungaria, Osman-Empire,...). If I see it the right way then we are still missing the synthesis of the democratic-republican concepts with multi-national concepts.
 
Last edited:
Excellent examples. Maybe. I don’t know. I don’t read or speak or understand German.

It's about the so called "German revolution" 1848/1849. German democrats suggested to the king of Prussia to become emperor of Germany by the grace of the people. Most former Germanic nations use this concept of a democratic monarchy called "representative monarchy". The king of Prussia answered he likes only to be "emperor by god's grace" = an absolutistic emperor. So this failed, and the German revolution was suppressed by force. Many democrats fled to the USA at that time. In 1870 the Prussian king became emperor of [I personally say "over"] Germany in Versailles (=reference to the absolutistic monarchy of the French kings and the citizen Napoleon Bonaparte and followers).

He quotes Bismark - who made it with lies and intrigues and war that the Prussian Kings became emperors over Germany - and who said:

" Nicht durch Reden und Majoritätsbeschlüsse werden die großen Fragen der Zeit entschieden — daß" [korrekt wäre "das"] "ist der große Fehler von 1848 und 1849 gewesen — sondern durch Eisen und Blut. "
=
“The great questions of the day will not be decided by speeches and majority votes—that was the great mistake of 1848 and 1849—but by iron and blood.”

An extremely fateful, disastrous sentence. The German quote here contains a spelling mistake - he writes "daß" instead of "das".
 
Last edited:
Transposed digits: 1914. I'm sure if you not had been part of World War 1 the colonial-imperialist national concepts had lost (England, France, Russia, ...) and the multi-national union concepts had won (Germany, Austria-Hungaria, Osman-Empire,...). If I see it the right way then we are still missing the synthesis of the democratic-republican concepts with multi-national concepts.
it would be another world
 
it would be another world

Yes. An unimaginable strange world. But maybe it would be the real world and we are living now in a wrong world. All "solutions" of World War 1 exploded and are exploding as if history would try to correct all this absurd mistakes. The problem is: History not knows experiments. Do it and it is done. We have not any criterion for good and evil in this context. Only god knows. For us it is what it is. And what not is we are not able to know.

I know for example that I am alive because Hitler lived. And I know that something existed "since ever" in the universe what I am now. Experiment by thoughts: If a time machine would exist someone could kill me yesterday so today I would not live. But this one also could kill me at any other day in my former life. Or this one could make it impossible that my mother and my father met each other. And so on, and so an. That's why I say sometimes I am 13.8 billion years old - also in physics and not only in meta-physics!!!

So if Hitler not had lived for example I would not exist and I could not speak with you now. So I am an answer to a universe in which Adolf Hitler existed who murdered a big part of my families. Strange feeling but so it is. Nevertheless this all not really to do with me (= I did do nothing that it is so) - but I'm also an existing answer to this all what had happened before me so I was born. Only thatI am today this what I am today has something to do with me on my own since my birth. But also in thsi case: We have our own life not totally in our own hands - but also not totally out of our own hands - as the Dalai Lama said.
 
Last edited:
Everyone can sell to everyone and buy from everyone.



What's first of all nonsense and secondly totally uninteresting. 2/3rd of the Swiss are for example Germans - more concrete: Allemani.



You are a totally weird idiot who has not any idea about real history.



It is totally clear what Stalin and Hitler did do in the secret part of the Molotow-Ribbentrop pact. They decided to ignore the results of World War 1 and liked to seperate Poland again. I guess Stalin did do so on imperial and colonialistic reasons and Hitler did do so on reason to be able to eliminate Stalin more easily.



Hitler liked ot conquer whole Europe, Russia and the whole world. He never had stopped. I guess he liked to be the greatest German of all times and the greatest artist who created with the brushes terror and war the greatest artwork which ever had been done. The problem: He was not really a good artist but only a great narcissist.

You fought for the devil Stalin against the satan Hitler - and you are still proud that you did do so. What you ignore is that you on your own created Hitler and Stalin in World War 1 and you created also the current situation now in World War 2. Welcome back to your cold war which soon will be able to become a hot war. But what a luck that you know again who is guilty - now has to follow only the next step to punish the innocent so you can be "great again".
You are either an idiot who knows nothing about history, or a paid propagandist. Most likely an idiot, since even your propaganda is ignorant of facts.
 
Paid by whom?

An interesting question. Hope it is god. Without his help I would be nothing - but also in this case I would perhaps be a happy nothing.

You are either an idiot who knows nothing about history, or a paid propagandist. Most likely an idiot, since even your propaganda is ignorant of facts.

And what answer do you now expect except you expect no answer at all?

Eh’ du auf andre willst mit Waffen schießen,
mußt du erst selber was zu schaffen wissen.

Erich Mühsam
Before you shoot at others with weapons,
you must first know how to create something yourself.


Translation:

M: Bon appétit.
S: Where's the meat?
M: There isn't any today.
S: I don't want vegetables.
M: At least eat the carrots.
S: Carrots are for babies. I want meat.
M: What kind of movie are you watching?
S: I want meat, otherwise my muscles won't grow.
...
M: Okay, big guy, go get your meat.
 
Last edited:
does he?

I am confused of his motives

And why does he post in German as well?
I believe because he is German and probably an East German zealot who wishes for the good old days of control by the Stasi and the totalitarian government were back.
 
It's about the so called "German revolution" 1848/1849. German democrats suggested to the king of Prussia to become emperor of Germany by the grace of the people. Most former Germanic nations use this concept of a democratic monarchy called "representative monarchy". The king of Prussia answered he likes only to be "emperor by god's grace" = an absolutistic emperor. So this failed, and the German revolution was suppressed by force. Many democrats fled to the USA at that time. In 1870 the Prussian king became emperor of [I personally say "over"] Germany in Versailles (=reference to the absolutistic monarchy of the French kings and the citizen Napoleon Bonaparte and followers).

He quotes Bismark - who made it with lies and intrigues and war that the Prussian Kings became emperors over Germany - and who said:

" Nicht durch Reden und Majoritätsbeschlüsse werden die großen Fragen der Zeit entschieden — daß" [korrekt wäre "das"] "ist der große Fehler von 1848 und 1849 gewesen — sondern durch Eisen und Blut. "
=
“The great questions of the day will not be decided by speeches and majority votes—that was the great mistake of 1848 and 1849—but by iron and blood.”

An extremely fateful, disastrous sentence. The German quote here contains a spelling mistake - he writes "daß" instead of "das".
in the Grand Duchy of Baden the Revolution succeeded at first
 
15th post
Considering all he posts are things pro-Russia, I will leave the deductive reasoning to you.
I believe because he is German and probably an East German zealot who wishes for the good old days of control by the Stasi and the totalitarian government were back.

Sure, undead US-Russian. Are you able to be anything else than criminally stupid or a stupid criminal, anti-US-American? You should not forget: "maranatha". And the question really is: "Who cares?". So what do you really care about? A living or an undead USA?

 
Last edited:
in the Grand Duchy of Baden the Revolution succeeded at first

¿Succeeded? ¿What? Are you proud to be the grand duke of Baden who "wan" in the end? Because "the Prussians", the new nobles, wan? By the way: Prussia had conquered one by one Germany nation and made them to "colonies of Prussia" - no joke!!! - this was verbally written so in some of the new constitutions made from the Prussians. Later this British Prussification of Germany and the intrigues and lies of Prussia forced a military unity of Germany because the stupid French king declared war on Germany on reason of his "honor". What an absurd honor of a statesman to slaughter the own people in war. Unfortunatelly we had to win this stupid war on France in 1870. But who for heavens sake really needed all this new arrogant Prussian Brits in the tradition of Napoleon Bonaparte and Queen Victoria now in Germany? The Prussian blind obedience ("Kadavergehorsam") opened - together with many other factors - the way to World War 1 and was later the most mighty weapon of Adolf Hitler and his supercriminal gang for the downfall of Germany.

 
Last edited:
does he?

I am confused of his motives

What for heavens sake could I have to do with your confusion?

And why does he post in German as well?

I'm a German. I'm for example not able to translate the word "Kadavergehorsam" - an obedience which ignores that the result of this obedience will be the own death. So I call it "blind obedience" - what's not really the meaning but only an approximation. When I write the German word I give a native English speaker the ability to find out what I really think about. Perhaps exists such a structure also in the English language which I only do not know.
 
Last edited:
I'm a German. I'm for example not able to translate the word "Kadavergehorsam" - an obedience which ignores that the result of this obedience will be the own death. So I call it "blind obedience" - what's not really the meaning but only an approximation. When I write the German word I give a native English speaker the ability to find out what I really think about. Perhaps exists such a structure also in the English language which I only do not know.
your sentence structure is German, not English
 
Back
Top Bottom