What???? There's More??????

[PoliticalChic]

1. Soooo.....Durham's first filing named Sussmann in particular, but put Hillary et. al. in the spotlight.
Liars, all of the dozens of slanders of Trump came from the Democrats, and total morons are still nodding and believing every lie.

Well....the first charge was lying to the FBI.....now a filing adds that Sussmann was also lying to the CIA.


2. "Durham also alleges that Sussmann in February 2017 provided an "updated set of allegations," including the Alfa Bank claims, and additional allegations related to Trump to a second U.S. government agency, which Fox News has confirmed was the CIA.

3. In his filing Friday, Durham says the government expects to "adduce evidence at trial" that will reflect that the FBI and the CIA "concluded that the Russian Bank 1 allegations were untrue and unsupported.


4. Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user created'

5. Mueller's investigation found no evidence of illegal or criminal coordination between Trump or the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016.

Durham has indicted three people as part of his investigation: Sussmann in September 2021, Igor Danchenko in November 2021 and Kevin Clinesmith in August 2020."

Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user created'

Special Counsel John Durham asserted in a court filing Friday that the CIA concluded data from Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann alleging coordination between Donald Trump and Russia was "not technically plausible" and was "user created."

www.foxnews.com

Which is a bigger joke.....Russia Collision, or Jan6 Insurrection?????????

 

[daveman]

Democrats have to lie. All the time. Because reality does not ever support their claims.

 

[excalibur]

1. Soooo.....Durham's first filing named Sussmann in particular, but put Hillary et. al. in the spotlight.
Liars, all of the dozens of slanders of Trump came from the Democrats, and total morons are still nodding and believing every lie.

Well....the first charge was lying to the FBI.....now a filing adds that Sussmann was also lying to the CIA.


2. "Durham also alleges that Sussmann in February 2017 provided an "updated set of allegations," including the Alfa Bank claims, and additional allegations related to Trump to a second U.S. government agency, which Fox News has confirmed was the CIA.

3. In his filing Friday, Durham says the government expects to "adduce evidence at trial" that will reflect that the FBI and the CIA "concluded that the Russian Bank 1 allegations were untrue and unsupported.


4. Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user created'

5. Mueller's investigation found no evidence of illegal or criminal coordination between Trump or the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016.

Durham has indicted three people as part of his investigation: Sussmann in September 2021, Igor Danchenko in November 2021 and Kevin Clinesmith in August 2020."

Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user created'

Special Counsel John Durham asserted in a court filing Friday that the CIA concluded data from Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann alleging coordination between Donald Trump and Russia was "not technically plausible" and was "user created."

www.foxnews.com

Which is a bigger joke.....Russia Collision, or Jan6 Insurrection?????????

The Biden inspired war in Ukraine.

While Biden kept withholding lethal aid from Ukraine, several times in 2021, and as recently as February 2022, he and his band of shitheads kept whispering about NATO in the dummy Zelensky's ear. And here we are, sucking most of the air out of other stories with this stupid war in Ukraine.

 

[berg80]

Mueller's investigation found no evidence of illegal or criminal coordination between Trump or the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016.

Some wondered if the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., would be charged in the Mueller investigation after his admitted 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer to solicit dirt on Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. Well, that’s not the case. He and and other participants–then-campaign manager Paul Manafort and senior advisor Jared Kushner— aren’t being charged with violating campaign finance law because there wasn’t “admissible evidence” to show that they knew that what they were doing was illegal, according to the newly released and redacted Mueller Report.

“To prove that a defendant acted ‘knowledgeably and willfully,’ the government would have to show that the defendant had general knowledge his conduct was unlawful,” said the report.

Donald Trump Jr. 'Too Dumb' to Prosecute | Law & Crime

Some wondered if the president's son, Donald Trump Jr., would be charged in the Mueller investigation. Well, that's not the case.

lawandcrime.com

Ignorance of the law isn't supposed to be an admissible defense for breaking it. But then Mueller is a Repub so...........

BTW, Durham, the hack appointed by Billy the Bagman.............hilarious.

 

[excalibur]

Democrats have to lie. All the time. Because reality does not ever support their claims.

You see that multiple times a day with the postings of the board's leftoids. Unreality rules them.

PS See the post immediately above this one.

 

[Stashman]

Wasn't it Sussmann who it turned out being the secret whistle blower that Schiff wouldn't name?

 

[daveman]

Some wondered if the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., would be charged in the Mueller investigation after his admitted 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer to solicit dirt on Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. Well, that’s not the case. He and and other participants–then-campaign manager Paul Manafort and senior advisor Jared Kushner— aren’t being charged with violating campaign finance law because there wasn’t “admissible evidence” to show that they knew that what they were doing was illegal, according to the newly released and redacted Mueller Report.

“To prove that a defendant acted ‘knowledgeably and willfully,’ the government would have to show that the defendant had general knowledge his conduct was unlawful,” said the report.

Donald Trump Jr. 'Too Dumb' to Prosecute | Law & Crime

Some wondered if the president's son, Donald Trump Jr., would be charged in the Mueller investigation. Well, that's not the case.

lawandcrime.com

Ignorance of the law isn't supposed to be an admissible defense for breaking it. But then Mueller is a Repub so...........

BTW, Durham, the hack appointed by Billy the Bagman.............hilarious.

Pay attention. The Russian collusion non-story was made up out of whole cloth by Democrats. Only idiots still believe it.

 

[berg80]

Wasn't it Sussmann who it turned out being the secret whistle blower that Schiff wouldn't name?

I don't know. But then I don't frequent right wing conspiracy sites.

 

[berg80]

Pay attention. The Russian collusion non-story was made up out of whole cloth by Democrats. Only idiots still believe it.

So..........you're saying the Trump Tower meeting never happened?

 

[lennypartiv]

So..........you're saying the Trump Tower meeting never happened?

So you're saying it's illegal for Americans to meet with non-Americans?

 

[daveman]

So..........you're saying the Trump Tower meeting never happened?

You probably believe the Piss Dossier, don't you?

 

[berg80]

Pay attention. The Russian collusion non-story was made up out of whole cloth by Democrats. Only idiots still believe it.

Are you saying this is made up?

The President’s Efforts to Prevent Disclosure of Emails About the June 9, 2016
Meeting Between Russians and Senior Campaign Officials
Overview

By June 2017, the President became aware of emails setting up the June 9, 2016 meeting
between senior campaign officials and Russians who offered derogatory information on Hillary
Clinton as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” On multiple occasions
in late June and early July 2017, the President directed aides not to publicly disclose the emails,
and he then dictated a statement about the meeting to be issued by Donald Trump Jr. describing
the meeting as about adoption.
Evidence
1. The President Learns About the Existence of Emails Concerning the June 9,
2016 Trump Tower Meeting
In mid-June 2017—the same week that the President first asked Lewandowski to pass a
message to Sessions—senior Administration officials became aware of emails exchanged during
the campaign arranging a meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, and
a Russian attorney.663 As described in Volume I, Section IV.A.5, supra, the emails stated that the
“Crown [P]rosecutor of Russia” had offered “to provide the Trump campaign with some official
documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia” as part
of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”664 Trump Jr. responded, “f it’s what
you say I love it,”665 and he, Kushner, and Manafort met with the Russian attorney and several
other Russian individuals at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016.666 At the meeting, the Russian attorney
claimed that funds derived from illegal activities in Russia were provided to Hillary Clinton and
other Democrats, and the Russian attorney then spoke about the Magnitsky Act, a 2012 U.S. statute
that imposed financial and travel sanctions on Russian officials and that had resulted in a retaliatory
ban in Russia on U.S. adoptions of Russian children.667
According to written answers submitted by the President in response to questions from this
Office, the President had no recollection of learning of the meeting or the emails setting it up at the
time the meeting occurred or at any other time before the election.668

How do you feel about Trump lying to Mueller's office about knowledge of the meeting?

 

[berg80]

So you're saying it's illegal for Americans to meet with non-Americans?

I'm saying Mueller didn't charge for the illegal meeting because Donnie J was too stupid.

 

[Stashman]

Are you saying this is made up?

The President’s Efforts to Prevent Disclosure of Emails About the June 9, 2016
Meeting Between Russians and Senior Campaign Officials
Overview

By June 2017, the President became aware of emails setting up the June 9, 2016 meeting
between senior campaign officials and Russians who offered derogatory information on Hillary
Clinton as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” On multiple occasions
in late June and early July 2017, the President directed aides not to publicly disclose the emails,
and he then dictated a statement about the meeting to be issued by Donald Trump Jr. describing
the meeting as about adoption.
Evidence
1. The President Learns About the Existence of Emails Concerning the June 9,
2016 Trump Tower Meeting
In mid-June 2017—the same week that the President first asked Lewandowski to pass a
message to Sessions—senior Administration officials became aware of emails exchanged during
the campaign arranging a meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, and
a Russian attorney.663 As described in Volume I, Section IV.A.5, supra, the emails stated that the
“Crown [P]rosecutor of Russia” had offered “to provide the Trump campaign with some official
documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia” as part
of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”664 Trump Jr. responded, “f it’s what
you say I love it,”665 and he, Kushner, and Manafort met with the Russian attorney and several
other Russian individuals at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016.666 At the meeting, the Russian attorney
claimed that funds derived from illegal activities in Russia were provided to Hillary Clinton and
other Democrats, and the Russian attorney then spoke about the Magnitsky Act, a 2012 U.S. statute
that imposed financial and travel sanctions on Russian officials and that had resulted in a retaliatory
ban in Russia on U.S. adoptions of Russian children.667
According to written answers submitted by the President in response to questions from this
Office, the President had no recollection of learning of the meeting or the emails setting it up at the
time the meeting occurred or at any other time before the election.668

How do you feel about Trump lying to Mueller's office about knowledge of the meeting?

Look buddy it's not hard to understand. If there was anything to it at all if would of come out. Especially from the democrat party that has investigated Trump over and over and over again. But it didn't come out as being anything other than the same ole BS your party has always been about.

 

[berg80]

In analyzing the President’s actions regarding the disclosure of information about the June
9 meeting, the following evidence is relevant to the elements of obstruction of justice:
a. Obstructive act. On at least three occasions between June 29, 2017, and July 9,
2017, the President directed Hicks and others not to publicly disclose information about the June
9, 2016 meeting between senior campaign officials and a Russian attorney. On June 29, Hicks
warned the President that the emails setting up the June 9 meeting were “really bad” and the story
would be “massive” when it broke, but the President told her and Kushner to “leave it alone.”
Early on July 8, after Hicks told the President the New York Times was working on a story about
the June 9 meeting, the President directed her not to comment, even though Hicks said that the
President usually considered not responding to the press to be the ultimate sin. Later that day, the
President rejected Trump Jr.’s draft statement that would have acknowledged that the meeting was
with “an individual who I was told might have information helpful to the campaign.” The
President then dictated a statement to Hicks that said the meeting was about Russian adoption
(which the President had twice been told was discussed at the meeting). The statement dictated
by the President did not mention the offer of derogatory information about Clinton.
Each of these efforts by the President involved his communications team and was directed
at the press. They would amount to obstructive acts only if the President, by taking these actions,
sought to withhold information from or mislead congressional investigators or the Special Counsel.
On May 17, 2017, the President’s campaign received a document request from SSCI that clearly
covered the June 9 meeting and underlying emails, and those documents also plainly would have
been relevant to the Special Counsel’s investigation.

 

[berg80]

Look buddy it's not hard to understand. If there was anything to it at all if would of come out. Especially from the democrat party that has investigated Trump over and over and over again. But it didn't come out as being anything other than the same ole BS your party has always been about.

I'm not sure what you mean. It's all in Mueller's report. Including Mueller's assessment that Donnie J broke the law but was unaware of the statute he broke. So he decided not to prosecute........as a Repub. Mueller being directly supervised by Rosenstein, a Repub, appointed by Trump.

 

[daveman]

Are you saying this is made up?

The President’s Efforts to Prevent Disclosure of Emails About the June 9, 2016
Meeting Between Russians and Senior Campaign Officials
Overview

By June 2017, the President became aware of emails setting up the June 9, 2016 meeting
between senior campaign officials and Russians who offered derogatory information on Hillary
Clinton as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” On multiple occasions
in late June and early July 2017, the President directed aides not to publicly disclose the emails,
and he then dictated a statement about the meeting to be issued by Donald Trump Jr. describing
the meeting as about adoption.
Evidence
1. The President Learns About the Existence of Emails Concerning the June 9,
2016 Trump Tower Meeting
In mid-June 2017—the same week that the President first asked Lewandowski to pass a
message to Sessions—senior Administration officials became aware of emails exchanged during
the campaign arranging a meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, and
a Russian attorney.663 As described in Volume I, Section IV.A.5, supra, the emails stated that the
“Crown [P]rosecutor of Russia” had offered “to provide the Trump campaign with some official
documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia” as part
of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”664 Trump Jr. responded, “f it’s what
you say I love it,”665 and he, Kushner, and Manafort met with the Russian attorney and several
other Russian individuals at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016.666 At the meeting, the Russian attorney
claimed that funds derived from illegal activities in Russia were provided to Hillary Clinton and
other Democrats, and the Russian attorney then spoke about the Magnitsky Act, a 2012 U.S. statute
that imposed financial and travel sanctions on Russian officials and that had resulted in a retaliatory
ban in Russia on U.S. adoptions of Russian children.667
According to written answers submitted by the President in response to questions from this
Office, the President had no recollection of learning of the meeting or the emails setting it up at the
time the meeting occurred or at any other time before the election.668

How do you feel about Trump lying to Mueller's office about knowledge of the meeting?

Millions of dollars spent on the investigation, only to come up with no chains, no perp walk, no trial.

You were lied to.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Any day now.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You were lied to.

As are you being

 

[daveman]

I'm not sure what you mean. It's all in Mueller's report. Including Mueller's assessment that Donnie J broke the law but was unaware of the statute he broke. So he decided not to prosecute........as a Repub. Mueller being directly supervised by Rosenstein, a Repub, appointed by Trump.

So, Donnie, Sr, is responsible for the crimes of his son.

Interesting. Now do Joe and Hunter Biden.