What???? There's More??????

[berg80]

You guys should read Mueller's report. Especially Sec. II, pages 78-90 where he discusses, in great detail, one of Trump's act of obstruction.

 

[daveman]

As are you being

The Trump trial will be any day now.

 

[TeeDub]

I don't know. But then I don't frequent right wing conspiracy sites.

Why not they were the only ones who got this RIGHT! Moron.

 

[berg80]

So, Donnie, Sr, is responsible for the crimes of his son.

Nice deflection, but not the point. The matter at hand is whether there was an illegal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. The Trump Tower meeting checks all the boxes...........sans Donnie J's stupidity and Mueller being a Repub.

 

[berg80]

Why not they were the only ones who got this RIGHT! Moron.

Good one. I needed a laugh.

 

[TeeDub]

In analyzing the President’s actions regarding the disclosure of information about the June
9 meeting, the following evidence is relevant to the elements of obstruction of justice:
a. Obstructive act. On at least three occasions between June 29, 2017, and July 9,
2017, the President directed Hicks and others not to publicly disclose information about the June
9, 2016 meeting between senior campaign officials and a Russian attorney. On June 29, Hicks
warned the President that the emails setting up the June 9 meeting were “really bad” and the story
would be “massive” when it broke, but the President told her and Kushner to “leave it alone.”
Early on July 8, after Hicks told the President the New York Times was working on a story about
the June 9 meeting, the President directed her not to comment, even though Hicks said that the
President usually considered not responding to the press to be the ultimate sin. Later that day, the
President rejected Trump Jr.’s draft statement that would have acknowledged that the meeting was
with “an individual who I was told might have information helpful to the campaign.” The
President then dictated a statement to Hicks that said the meeting was about Russian adoption
(which the President had twice been told was discussed at the meeting). The statement dictated
by the President did not mention the offer of derogatory information about Clinton.
Each of these efforts by the President involved his communications team and was directed
at the press. They would amount to obstructive acts only if the President, by taking these actions,
sought to withhold information from or mislead congressional investigators or the Special Counsel.
On May 17, 2017, the President’s campaign received a document request from SSCI that clearly
covered the June 9 meeting and underlying emails, and those documents also plainly would have
been relevant to the Special Counsel’s investigation.

Is Obama still flexible enough for Vlad?

 

[berg80]

Guys, I think we lost political chick. She is no doubt conjuring up the subject of her next pile of horseshit thread.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The Trump trial will be any day now.

Yeah, it will be right after Hillary is locked up.

I have said from the very beginning on this very forum that Trump did nothing illegal. I was against the Mueller investigation and the impeachment.

You though think that Durham is going to be your savior .

sucks to be you

 

[Stashman]

I'm not sure what you mean. It's all in Mueller's report. Including Mueller's assessment that Donnie J broke the law but was unaware of the statute he broke. So he decided not to prosecute........as a Repub. Mueller being directly supervised by Rosenstein, a Repub, appointed by Trump.

If that's what floats your boat than go right ahead.

 

[berg80]

Is Obama still flexible enough for Vlad?

Really? That crap again.

Obama had previously drawn criticism from politicians in the U.S. and Europe for canceling the Bush-era plan to station land-based interceptors in Poland and the Czech Republic in 2009. Obama was further criticized for announcing the change on the day of the 70th anniversary of the Soviet Union’s invasion of Poland during World War II.

Conley said that announcement would “go down in the history of poorly timed announcements.” Obama was also caught on an open mic in 2012 telling then-Russian President Dimitry Medvedev, that “After my election I have more flexibility,” with regard to the U.S.-led NATO missile defense system in Europe.

Obama’s posture made the Poles and Czechs “very concerned” that the entire missile defense project would be abandoned by his administration, according to Conley.

But, she said, “What they wound up getting with the current system was more robust than they had anticipated.”
https://www.cnn.com/2016/05/11/politics/nato-missile-defense-romania-poland/index.html

Are there any other right wing media lies I can clear up for you?

 

[berg80]

If that's what floats your boat than go right ahead.

Well, yes, the facts float my boat. Unfortunately for you they sink your's.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Some wondered if the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., would be charged in the Mueller investigation after his admitted 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer to solicit dirt on Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. Well, that’s not the case. He and and other participants–then-campaign manager Paul Manafort and senior advisor Jared Kushner— aren’t being charged with violating campaign finance law because there wasn’t “admissible evidence” to show that they knew that what they were doing was illegal, according to the newly released and redacted Mueller Report.

“To prove that a defendant acted ‘knowledgeably and willfully,’ the government would have to show that the defendant had general knowledge his conduct was unlawful,” said the report.

Donald Trump Jr. 'Too Dumb' to Prosecute | Law & Crime

Some wondered if the president's son, Donald Trump Jr., would be charged in the Mueller investigation. Well, that's not the case.

lawandcrime.com

Ignorance of the law isn't supposed to be an admissible defense for breaking it. But then Mueller is a Repub so...........

BTW, Durham, the hack appointed by Billy the Bagman.............hilarious.

Time and again you author posts which tend to be nothing more than artifacts of mental illness.


Some 50 lies and hoaxes have been exposed.....including every slanderous attempt to state some traitorous relatonship between Trump and Russia......when the dossier was clear proof that Hillary colluded with the Kremlin and she was the candidate they favored, having bribed her in the past.


I always wondered if you could be as stupid as you appear......and.....you are!

 

[whitehall]

It's a crime to lie to the FBI but it isn't a crime when they lie to us. How does that work? The CIA lies for a living so don't tell me it's a crime to lie to the Agency too?

 

[TeeDub]

Good one. I needed a laugh.

Laugh? You loved being lied to by the MSM and your DNC Masters, fool. So where is the pee tape, the collusion, the Russian bank connections, and all his tax scams? Seems the ones headed for tax problems are all named Biden.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Are you saying this is made up?

The President’s Efforts to Prevent Disclosure of Emails About the June 9, 2016
Meeting Between Russians and Senior Campaign Officials
Overview

By June 2017, the President became aware of emails setting up the June 9, 2016 meeting
between senior campaign officials and Russians who offered derogatory information on Hillary
Clinton as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” On multiple occasions
in late June and early July 2017, the President directed aides not to publicly disclose the emails,
and he then dictated a statement about the meeting to be issued by Donald Trump Jr. describing
the meeting as about adoption.
Evidence
1. The President Learns About the Existence of Emails Concerning the June 9,
2016 Trump Tower Meeting
In mid-June 2017—the same week that the President first asked Lewandowski to pass a
message to Sessions—senior Administration officials became aware of emails exchanged during
the campaign arranging a meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, and
a Russian attorney.663 As described in Volume I, Section IV.A.5, supra, the emails stated that the
“Crown [P]rosecutor of Russia” had offered “to provide the Trump campaign with some official
documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia” as part
of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”664 Trump Jr. responded, “f it’s what
you say I love it,”665 and he, Kushner, and Manafort met with the Russian attorney and several
other Russian individuals at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016.666 At the meeting, the Russian attorney
claimed that funds derived from illegal activities in Russia were provided to Hillary Clinton and
other Democrats, and the Russian attorney then spoke about the Magnitsky Act, a 2012 U.S. statute
that imposed financial and travel sanctions on Russian officials and that had resulted in a retaliatory
ban in Russia on U.S. adoptions of Russian children.667
According to written answers submitted by the President in response to questions from this
Office, the President had no recollection of learning of the meeting or the emails setting it up at the
time the meeting occurred or at any other time before the election.668

How do you feel about Trump lying to Mueller's office about knowledge of the meeting?

Wikipedia?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Really? That crap again. https://www.cnn.com/2016/05/11/politics/nato-missile-defense-romania-poland/index.html

So that one may gauge exactly the degree of imbecility you represent.......which of these did you believe...or, still do????



“… I would like to call attention to the principle of jurisprudence “Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus” (False in one thing, false in all). Although written in Latin, it’s English common law from the early 17th century, stating that “a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter.”

Durham Reveals Democrats Behaving Like KGB; Is More Coming?​

Commentary John Durham, the man chosen by former Attorney General William Barr as special counsel to unearth possible ...

www.theepochtimes.com

There are sooooo very many lies on which the Left's politics and promises are built.
One can take his pick....that there is systemic racism, the election was fair, illegals don't vote, gun control is aimed at criminals, CRT isn't taught in government school, welfare stops starvation, the Democrat's flipped and the Republicans became the party of racism, Nazis were rightwing, Liberals founded this nation, Hillary is the smartest woman in the country and Bill Clinton ever had a budget surplus, women have a right to kill their unborn, women get paid less for the same job.....and "1 in 5 women being sexually assaulted while in college."



Democrats lie about everything….on what basis would any of their fabricated data be considered valid???
Here the prism through which every Democrat pronouncement should be viewed: First collusion, collusion, collusion, Russia, Russia, Russia, Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction. Racist, Racist, Racist, Impeach, Impeach, Impeach, Recession, Recession, Recession, Emoluments, 25th amendment, “HandsUpDon’tShoot,”Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the Kavanaugh hoax, the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ General Flynn perjury trap, no evidence of voter fraud in the stolen election.....and “More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president's son."



Don’t forget the Democrats told you that Trump was colluding with Russia…and that wasn’t true. They also told you that so was Naval Academy grad Carter Page and so was George Papadopoulos and so was General Michael Flynn, a three star general and former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency….and all of that was a lie. How stupid must one be to keep believing what they say?
...and, and that ‘armed insurrection’ that never occurred, and AOC lying about her near-death experience in the Capitol Riots.....when she wasn't even in the Capitol. And, of course the 275 Democrat inspired riots were ‘mostly peaceful.’

And that Biden voters as agents provocateur weren't behind the Capitol Riot.....and that Pelosi knew and refused to allow extra security. They lie about everything.......yet Democrat voters are, ready to swallow the next lie.

And that the Wuhan Red Death did not come from a Chinese Communist lab that got its funding via Dr. Fauci, and its purpose was to remove Trump….

FakeStories: Three years of Russian Collusion stories; altering documents at the DoJ and FBI to railroad political opponents; the state media burying the Hunter Biden Scandal what with Joe getting 10% of the bribes; stories about Kavanaugh rape parties, and Covington Catholic School; Carter Page working for Russia when he was actually working for the CIA….where were those ‘fact checkers’? The great lie that there was an ‘insurrection’ January 6th. The lie that it was Republicans who wanted to defund the police. The lie that Critical Race Theory wasn’t being taught. The lie that 600,000 died from the Wuhan Red Death.
What should you do when they lied to you at least these 30 times already???????????

Democrats claimed it was Republicans who demanded defunding the police, AOC claimed ten people were killed Jan6th, Ilhan Omar blames the police for crime, they claimed that CRT wasn’t being taught in government school, men can become pregnant, and MAGA fans attacked Jussie Smollett, inflation due to Putin and the invasion…

• Brett Kavanaugh — Serial Rapist
• President Michael Avenatti
• The Covington KKKids Hoax
• Hands Up, Don’t Shoot
• George Zimmerman
• Mostly Peaceful Black Lives Matter Riots
• The Russia Collusion Hoax
• Antifa Stormed the Beaches on D-Day
• Cuomo (D-NY): King of Coronavirus Competence
• The Clearing of Lafayette Square Hoax
• The Lab Leak Theory Has Been Debunked Hoax
• The Russians Are Behind Hunter’s Laptop Hoax
• The Russian Bounty Hoax
• The Capitol Police Officer Killed with a Fire Extinguisher Hoax
• The Very Fine People Hoax
• Men Can Magically Transform into Women
• And on and on and on…

…what is the point of watching any corporate media outlet? All they do is lie. Even if you are an NPR wine mom, you do not want to be serially lied to.
The era of corporate media influence is ending thanks to the over the top bias, and that should be good for the future. Americans are rebelling against these exposed frauds, and 2022 should be a turning point."
Mark Simone 710

 

[PoliticalChic]

You see that multiple times a day with the postings of the board's leftoids. Unreality rules them.

PS See the post immediately above this one.

He is the exemplar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm saying Mueller didn't charge for the illegal meeting because Donnie J was too stupid.

I must admit that I am surprised......that after some 50 lies and hoaxes by the Democrat Party have been exposed, you don't know enough to take the very opposite view of everything they tell you.





It is only the Democrat Party that is a supporter, protector and extoller of Russian, and has been since FDR. And it has been reciprocated by their fellow communists.



Exposition of Democrats colluding with Russia:








To appear as though you were an adult, first and foremost.....drop any reference to Putin and Russia.







That plot was exploded by the Mueller fiasco.



If there was any doubt who Putin favored as President….the dossier was a Russian attempt to sink the Trump campaign.







Second.....you, being as ignorant as you are, don't realize that the Democrat Party is the one that supported, shielded, and took orders from the Soviets for 70 years, and Obama made a quid pro quo with Putin.....here:



















Third,....the Democrat Party today stands for all of the aims of the Communist Party.







Succinctly put.....rules #1 and #2







Rule #1 Every argument from Democrats and Liberals is a misrepresentation, a fabrication, or a bald-faced lie.







Rule #2



To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.







2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.







“Nord Stream 2: Biden waives US sanctions on Russian pipeline”

Nord Stream 2: Biden waives US sanctions on Russian pipeline

The US also waives sanctions on a Putin ally who leads the firm behind the Nord Stream 2 project.

www.bbc.com

Democrat Jerry Nadler’s ties to Russia







Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.

Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.

 

[TeeDub]

Really? That crap again.

Obama had previously drawn criticism from politicians in the U.S. and Europe for canceling the Bush-era plan to station land-based interceptors in Poland and the Czech Republic in 2009. Obama was further criticized for announcing the change on the day of the 70th anniversary of the Soviet Union’s invasion of Poland during World War II.

Conley said that announcement would “go down in the history of poorly timed announcements.” Obama was also caught on an open mic in 2012 telling then-Russian President Dimitry Medvedev, that “After my election I have more flexibility,” with regard to the U.S.-led NATO missile defense system in Europe.

Obama’s posture made the Poles and Czechs “very concerned” that the entire missile defense project would be abandoned by his administration, according to Conley.

But, she said, “What they wound up getting with the current system was more robust than they had anticipated.”
https://www.cnn.com/2016/05/11/politics/nato-missile-defense-romania-poland/index.html

Are there any other right wing media lies I can clear up for you?

And than the great imposter gave Vlad the go ahead to take Crimea! Nice trade fool.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm not sure what you mean. It's all in Mueller's report. Including Mueller's assessment that Donnie J broke the law but was unaware of the statute he broke. So he decided not to prosecute........as a Repub. Mueller being directly supervised by Rosenstein, a Repub, appointed by Trump.

Let's check:


"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Barr wrote in a letter to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on Sunday afternoon.That was despite "multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign," he wrote. Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction

“ The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel's investigation was whether any Americans – including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” As noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts, although the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian nationals and entities in connection with these activities.” Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report (Published 2019)

“The Washington Post corrects, removes parts of two stories regarding the Steele dossier…Other stories that made the same assertion were corrected as well.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...c9b770-43d5-11ec-a88e-2aa4632af69b_story.html