Conservatism never had it to lose. Holier-than-thou attitudes and stubborn clinging to the past is not necessarily the best way to deal with social problems. Conservatives ban things, outlaw consensual activities, censor naughty words and a bunch of other shit that seeks to steal the joy from life. Conservatives stomp on fun for fun I guess.
That is your propaganda and your mantra designed to get everyone to generally agree with it even though they do not understand it and do not know that it is incorrect.
Why do you do this?
So you can impose Communism on us in yet one more attempt to make that turd of a political system fly.
And it never has and it never will.
And it killed more than 100 MILLION people in the efforts.
One thing you forget. Government is a business. It collects revenue like a business. It runs itself like a business, so for us, the parallels are too striking to distinguish the two from one another. One is just as predatory as the other. One is just as corrupt as the other.
What pisses me off about modern liberalism is their desire to meld the two.
How soon we forget... this is not unlike the sputtering retort to the point that candidate Romney would be one of the least experienced Presidents ever with, "b-but, but.. he's a businessman!". What was that, if not melding the two?
Oligarchy is not in any way party-specific. That's why I put that Eisenhower quote up there. It's not this party or that party ---- it's systemic.
You voted for obama, clearly the least experienced president in modern history. Never had a real job, never had to make a payroll, never had to file schedule C tax form, never had any profit and loss responsibility, never dealt with any international leaders---unless you consider his indonesian coke dealer.
I get it that you hate Romney and everyone with an R behind their name, but Romney would have been a very good president 10,000 times better than obama.
Uhhh... excuse me loser? You don't know who I voted for. Were you there in the booth?
Your "facts" are way off; O'bama, even in '08, was median in terms of pre-experience for Presidents (12 years, more than Reagan and twice as much as W.). Romney with his single term as governor would have been third from the bottom.
Pop quiz: who was the last POTUS to bring more experience to the job than O'bama?
See the link --
Gerald Ford
Not that such 'experience' means jack squat anyway; Romney would have landed just ahead of Teddy Roosevelt (one of the best) and Woodrow Wilson (one of the worst) -- the point was that business experience has nothing to do with political acumen. Business exists to make profit for itself by exploiting its customers; government (in theory) exists to enrich its customers quality of life by protecting it from exploitation.
In oligarchical practice of course, the business sector owns and therefore controls the government, so the last thing we'd need would be yet another insider from the fox den to run the proverbial henhouse.
Yes, thats what liberals and socialists do. under any socialist govt there is a very small group of super elites that controlls all of the money and all of the power------and everyone else is EQUALLY miserable-------and you idiots on the left want that for this country-------you are morons of the highest degree.
That is your propaganda and your mantra designed to get everyone to generally agree with it even though they do not understand it and do not know that it is incorrect.
Why do you do this?
So you can impose Communism on us in yet one more attempt to make that turd of a political system fly.
And it never has and it never will.
And it killed more than 100 MILLION people in the efforts.
How soon we forget... this is not unlike the sputtering retort to the point that candidate Romney would be one of the least experienced Presidents ever with, "b-but, but.. he's a businessman!". What was that, if not melding the two?
Oligarchy is not in any way party-specific. That's why I put that Eisenhower quote up there. It's not this party or that party ---- it's systemic.
You voted for obama, clearly the least experienced president in modern history. Never had a real job, never had to make a payroll, never had to file schedule C tax form, never had any profit and loss responsibility, never dealt with any international leaders---unless you consider his indonesian coke dealer.
I get it that you hate Romney and everyone with an R behind their name, but Romney would have been a very good president 10,000 times better than obama.
Uhhh... excuse me loser? You don't know who I voted for. Were you there in the booth?
Your "facts" are way off; O'bama, even in '08, was median in terms of pre-experience for Presidents (12 years, more than Reagan and twice as much as W.). Romney with his single term as governor would have been third from the bottom.
Not that such 'experience' means jack squat anyway; Romney would have landed just ahead of Teddy Roosevelt (one of the best) and Woodrow Wilson (one of the worst) -- the point was that business experience has nothing to do with political acumen. Business exists to make profit for itself by exploiting its customers; government (in theory) exists to enrich its customers quality of life by protecting it from exploitation.
In oligarchical practice of course, the business sector owns and therefore controls the government, so the last thing we'd need would be yet another insider from the fox den to run the proverbial henhouse.
That is your propaganda and your mantra designed to get everyone to generally agree with it even though they do not understand it and do not know that it is incorrect.
Why do you do this?
So you can impose Communism on us in yet one more attempt to make that turd of a political system fly.
And it never has and it never will.
And it killed more than 100 MILLION people in the efforts.
Damn, I figured there'd be whiners to this OP but I didn't think they'd be quite this impotent. Pretty much limited to gainsaying and "Eeeeet Shhhhhhhitttt Asssssss Hole".
Which in its way completely validates the OP's whole point.
Yes, thats what liberals and socialists do. under any socialist govt there is a very small group of super elites that controlls all of the money and all of the power------and everyone else is EQUALLY miserable-------and you idiots on the left want that for this country-------you are morons of the highest degree.
Damn, I figured there'd be whiners to this OP but I didn't think they'd be quite this impotent. Pretty much limited to gainsaying and "Eeeeet Shhhhhhhitttt Asssssss Hole".
Which in its way completely validates the OP's whole point.
I miss the conservatives that actually cared about the environment, the idea of conserving to save the environment ended over three decades ago.
And God cried.
Damn, I figured there'd be whiners to this OP but I didn't think they'd be quite this impotent. Pretty much limited to gainsaying and "Eeeeet Shhhhhhhitttt Asssssss Hole".
Which in its way completely validates the OP's whole point.
Damn, I figured there'd be whiners to this OP but I didn't think they'd be quite this impotent. Pretty much limited to gainsaying and "Eeeeet Shhhhhhhitttt Asssssss Hole".
Which in its way completely validates the OP's whole point.
Well let's see... I refuted points, used links to do it, ruminated on other points and posted appropriate quotes. You wrote, "Eeeeet Shhhhhitttt Asssssss Hole."
Damn, I figured there'd be whiners to this OP but I didn't think they'd be quite this impotent. Pretty much limited to gainsaying and "Eeeeet Shhhhhhhitttt Asssssss Hole".
Which in its way completely validates the OP's whole point.
How soon we forget... this is not unlike the sputtering retort to the point that candidate Romney would be one of the least experienced Presidents ever with, "b-but, but.. he's a businessman!". What was that, if not melding the two?
Oligarchy is not in any way party-specific. That's why I put that Eisenhower quote up there. It's not this party or that party ---- it's systemic.
You voted for obama, clearly the least experienced president in modern history. Never had a real job, never had to make a payroll, never had to file schedule C tax form, never had any profit and loss responsibility, never dealt with any international leaders---unless you consider his indonesian coke dealer.
I get it that you hate Romney and everyone with an R behind their name, but Romney would have been a very good president 10,000 times better than obama.
Uhhh... excuse me loser? You don't know who I voted for. Were you there in the booth?
Your "facts" are way off; O'bama, even in '08, was median in terms of pre-experience for Presidents (12 years, more than Reagan and twice as much as W.). Romney with his single term as governor would have been third from the bottom.
Pop quiz: who was the last POTUS to bring more experience to the job than O'bama?
See the link --
Gerald Ford
Not that such 'experience' means jack squat anyway; Romney would have landed just ahead of Teddy Roosevelt (one of the best) and Woodrow Wilson (one of the worst) -- the point was that business experience has nothing to do with political acumen. Business exists to make profit for itself by exploiting its customers; government (in theory) exists to enrich its customers quality of life by protecting it from exploitation.
In oligarchical practice of course, the business sector owns and therefore controls the government, so the last thing we'd need would be yet another insider from the fox den to run the proverbial henhouse.
Yeah, well you think Rush Limbaugh is a dumbass yet he was able to accurately predict that Obama was going to do and be exactly what he has done and been...a failure.
And you weren't smart enough to see it then.
So why should you be expected to know shit from Shinola now?
You shouldn't.
Rush Limbaugh is waaaaaay smarter than you and your ilkiness.
You are a ******* loser.
You are a pogo all right.
That's short for someone who inserts the pogo stick up his ass and bounces around on it, right?