What Liberals Fear More Than Obama Losing

By Geoffrey P. Hunt
08/30/2011
American Thinker


The left are now wringing their hands fearing their agenda is overripe, blaming everyone else for their own spoiled pickling. While Obama's sinking prospects for re-election are disquieting, the real source of liberals' despair is their sudden, unexpected realization that the progressive agenda is dead in its tracks and will likely be in full retreat after 2012.

. . . The end of the Progressive Era, eclipsing Obama, has come from two places -- one fiscal and pragmatic, the other ideological and visceral. First, the debt crisis and persistent economic woes have made it clear that the progressive agenda is unaffordable and unsustainable. The money pumps in the forms of more borrowing and taxes cannot possibly keep up with the tons of green water spending coming aboard.

Second, beyond the limited government ideology now gaining real traction, Americans without an ideology are finding that central planning madness from Washington is making their lives worse, not better.

. . . The liberal vision of the ideal state is fat, sloppy and lazy. Why exert yourself if someone else will buy you food stamps and school lunches? Why bother learning to read, write, do simple algebra, or acquire any employable skills when you'll get free health care and subsidized housing? Why eat right and keep fit when obesity and diabetes is a protected disability?

Americans are finally fed up with the Democrats' value system: no personal accountability; moral equivalence; belief that success is derived from exploiting everybody else; everybody else is a hapless victim; we are all racists and xenophobes, consigned to endless acts of contrition where reparations and open borders would be the only relief.


LINK
They say that private charitable organizations use most of their donations on administrative costs. Sometimes 70% or more.

With the government it's worse. When it comes to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other entitlements 75 cents out of every dollar goes to paying salaries, pensions, heating and AC, buying paper, computers, upkeep of facilities, etc.

The difference is that government doesn't make money it only spends it so it's all taken out of the treasury, and when that runs out it's ether borrowed or taxes are raised.
 
What is your point? My cat meowing makes more sense than your posts.

The majority of people that attended anti-war rallies, while the left cared about ending the wars--when Bush was in office--, were white. Are they racists?

This is the shallow mentality of the left.

Where did I say white? I said fat and old. Are you suggesting all white people are fat and old? Because that's just not true.

You said old, or elderly, or something like that. I'm using that logic, "the majority of people are....". Hell, that the Tea Party is composed mostly of white people is the stated reason why many on the left believe it is racist.

So you were using "logic" and ended up with something entirely different?

What about the original question? Using "logic", the Tea Party hates socialism. Many from the Tea Party look old and fat. During interviews, many say they are on Social Security, get Medicare or Medicaid. Those are "socialistic" programs. Many are showing up at town halls to protest the Republican Leadership's position of wanting to end Medicare.

What the fuck are they protesting and why??????????????

Could the issue here be the fact we have a black president and they don't want to say they hate having a black president. So instead, they protest something they need and end up looking like "goons". Logically, that is probably the bottom line. Because nothing else they say has any logic.
 
Where did I say white? I said fat and old. Are you suggesting all white people are fat and old? Because that's just not true.

You said old, or elderly, or something like that. I'm using that logic, "the majority of people are....". Hell, that the Tea Party is composed mostly of white people is the stated reason why many on the left believe it is racist.

So you were using "logic" and ended up with something entirely different?

What about the original question? Using "logic", the Tea Party hates socialism. Many from the Tea Party look old and fat. During interviews, many say they are on Social Security, get Medicare or Medicaid. Those are "socialistic" programs. Many are showing up at town halls to protest the Republican Leadership's position of wanting to end Medicare.

What the fuck are they protesting and why??????????????

Could the issue here be the fact we have a black president and they don't want to say they hate having a black president. So instead, they protest something they need and end up looking like "goons". Logically, that is probably the bottom line. Because nothing else they say has any logic.

Looking like goons????

Grandma?????

GOONS

assorted-goons-550x550.jpg
gunshine.jpg




Grandmas

samuelandallthegrandmas2.jpg
 
By Geoffrey P. Hunt
08/30/2011
American Thinker


The left are now wringing their hands fearing their agenda is overripe, blaming everyone else for their own spoiled pickling. While Obama's sinking prospects for re-election are disquieting, the real source of liberals' despair is their sudden, unexpected realization that the progressive agenda is dead in its tracks and will likely be in full retreat after 2012.

. . . The end of the Progressive Era, eclipsing Obama, has come from two places -- one fiscal and pragmatic, the other ideological and visceral. First, the debt crisis and persistent economic woes have made it clear that the progressive agenda is unaffordable and unsustainable. The money pumps in the forms of more borrowing and taxes cannot possibly keep up with the tons of green water spending coming aboard.

Second, beyond the limited government ideology now gaining real traction, Americans without an ideology are finding that central planning madness from Washington is making their lives worse, not better.

. . . The liberal vision of the ideal state is fat, sloppy and lazy. Why exert yourself if someone else will buy you food stamps and school lunches? Why bother learning to read, write, do simple algebra, or acquire any employable skills when you'll get free health care and subsidized housing? Why eat right and keep fit when obesity and diabetes is a protected disability?

Americans are finally fed up with the Democrats' value system: no personal accountability; moral equivalence; belief that success is derived from exploiting everybody else; everybody else is a hapless victim; we are all racists and xenophobes, consigned to endless acts of contrition where reparations and open borders would be the only relief.


LINK


100% agreed--Obama was their left wing agenda man. They have spent the wad on this man--moveon.org--funded by foreign billionaire George Soros--ACORN--along with liberal left wing college and university professors--all preaching that capitalism is EVIL--and that the WEALTHY are EVIL--and that everyone is a VICTIM--and appropriations should be made to them from all of the above. (They wouldn't support Hillary Clinton--because she wasn't as far left as Obama.)

It hasn't worked--and the reality that is doesn't work--has hit liberals right between the eyes. Massive government borrowing and spending has not created any long term private sector jobs--wealth redistribution has not worked and unemployment and misery has risen--and not diminished--under "pedal to the medal" left wing ideology. In fact, the only thing that has grown in leaps and bounds is the size and scope of the Federal Government--while the private sector continues to shrink.

The PERFECT LEFT WING STORM hit this country--and it was Pelosi--Reid and Obama--all with a full house--and this country is much worse off today than the day they took over.

$obama-speech.jpg
 
Last edited:
By Geoffrey P. Hunt
08/30/2011
American Thinker


The left are now wringing their hands fearing their agenda is overripe, blaming everyone else for their own spoiled pickling. While Obama's sinking prospects for re-election are disquieting, the real source of liberals' despair is their sudden, unexpected realization that the progressive agenda is dead in its tracks and will likely be in full retreat after 2012.

. . . The end of the Progressive Era, eclipsing Obama, has come from two places -- one fiscal and pragmatic, the other ideological and visceral. First, the debt crisis and persistent economic woes have made it clear that the progressive agenda is unaffordable and unsustainable. The money pumps in the forms of more borrowing and taxes cannot possibly keep up with the tons of green water spending coming aboard.

Second, beyond the limited government ideology now gaining real traction, Americans without an ideology are finding that central planning madness from Washington is making their lives worse, not better.

. . . The liberal vision of the ideal state is fat, sloppy and lazy. Why exert yourself if someone else will buy you food stamps and school lunches? Why bother learning to read, write, do simple algebra, or acquire any employable skills when you'll get free health care and subsidized housing? Why eat right and keep fit when obesity and diabetes is a protected disability?

Americans are finally fed up with the Democrats' value system: no personal accountability; moral equivalence; belief that success is derived from exploiting everybody else; everybody else is a hapless victim; we are all racists and xenophobes, consigned to endless acts of contrition where reparations and open borders would be the only relief.


LINK
They say that private charitable organizations use most of their donations on administrative costs. Sometimes 70% or more.

With the government it's worse. When it comes to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other entitlements 75 cents out of every dollar goes to paying salaries, pensions, heating and AC, buying paper, computers, upkeep of facilities, etc.

The difference is that government doesn't make money it only spends it so it's all taken out of the treasury, and when that runs out it's ether borrowed or taxes are raised.

Since your not putting any links, I won't either.

I once read that the cost to the VA for patients care was 94 cent for every dollar. Only 6 cents per dollar was used on Administrative costs.

Think about Medicare. Health Care companies won't insure the elderly because they cost too much. If we didn't have Medicare, they would have to rely one Emergency Rooms, which by law, no one can be turned away. That means their care would be anywhere from 10 to 100 time greater than regular health care costs and the tax payer would be left to foot the bill. They have to anyway, but at a fraction of the cost using Medicare.

That's just the reality.

Anytime you introduce a "profit motive", the costs skyrocket. Why? Because there is a "profit motive". Republicans say, "Oh, well you'll have competition and that will drive down the costs". Only that hasn't happened. You have insurance company CEO's getting a hundred million dollar bonus and the number one cause of bankruptcy is "Medical Bills". More of the same doesn't make it better, it makes it worse.

Too bad Republicans have dined on that swill for so long. They have lost the ability to understand what is so fucking obvious.
 
You said old, or elderly, or something like that. I'm using that logic, "the majority of people are....". Hell, that the Tea Party is composed mostly of white people is the stated reason why many on the left believe it is racist.

So you were using "logic" and ended up with something entirely different?

What about the original question? Using "logic", the Tea Party hates socialism. Many from the Tea Party look old and fat. During interviews, many say they are on Social Security, get Medicare or Medicaid. Those are "socialistic" programs. Many are showing up at town halls to protest the Republican Leadership's position of wanting to end Medicare.

What the fuck are they protesting and why??????????????

Could the issue here be the fact we have a black president and they don't want to say they hate having a black president. So instead, they protest something they need and end up looking like "goons". Logically, that is probably the bottom line. Because nothing else they say has any logic.

Looking like goons????

Grandma?????

GOONS

assorted-goons-550x550.jpg
gunshine.jpg




Grandmas

samuelandallthegrandmas2.jpg

Three Grandmas? Are two of those a "lesbian couple"?
 
By Geoffrey P. Hunt
08/30/2011
American Thinker


The left are now wringing their hands fearing their agenda is overripe, blaming everyone else for their own spoiled pickling. While Obama's sinking prospects for re-election are disquieting, the real source of liberals' despair is their sudden, unexpected realization that the progressive agenda is dead in its tracks and will likely be in full retreat after 2012.

. . . The end of the Progressive Era, eclipsing Obama, has come from two places -- one fiscal and pragmatic, the other ideological and visceral. First, the debt crisis and persistent economic woes have made it clear that the progressive agenda is unaffordable and unsustainable. The money pumps in the forms of more borrowing and taxes cannot possibly keep up with the tons of green water spending coming aboard.

Second, beyond the limited government ideology now gaining real traction, Americans without an ideology are finding that central planning madness from Washington is making their lives worse, not better.

. . . The liberal vision of the ideal state is fat, sloppy and lazy. Why exert yourself if someone else will buy you food stamps and school lunches? Why bother learning to read, write, do simple algebra, or acquire any employable skills when you'll get free health care and subsidized housing? Why eat right and keep fit when obesity and diabetes is a protected disability?

Americans are finally fed up with the Democrats' value system: no personal accountability; moral equivalence; belief that success is derived from exploiting everybody else; everybody else is a hapless victim; we are all racists and xenophobes, consigned to endless acts of contrition where reparations and open borders would be the only relief.


LINK
They say that private charitable organizations use most of their donations on administrative costs. Sometimes 70% or more.

With the government it's worse. When it comes to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other entitlements 75 cents out of every dollar goes to paying salaries, pensions, heating and AC, buying paper, computers, upkeep of facilities, etc.

The difference is that government doesn't make money it only spends it so it's all taken out of the treasury, and when that runs out it's ether borrowed or taxes are raised.

Since your not putting any links, I won't either.

I once read that the cost to the VA for patients care was 94 cent for every dollar. Only 6 cents per dollar was used on Administrative costs.

Think about Medicare. Health Care companies won't insure the elderly because they cost too much. If we didn't have Medicare, they would have to rely one Emergency Rooms, which by law, no one can be turned away. That means their care would be anywhere from 10 to 100 time greater than regular health care costs and the tax payer would be left to foot the bill. They have to anyway, but at a fraction of the cost using Medicare.

That's just the reality.

Anytime you introduce a "profit motive", the costs skyrocket. Why? Because there is a "profit motive". Republicans say, "Oh, well you'll have competition and that will drive down the costs". Only that hasn't happened. You have insurance company CEO's getting a hundred million dollar bonus and the number one cause of bankruptcy is "Medical Bills". More of the same doesn't make it better, it makes it worse.

Too bad Republicans have dined on that swill for so long. They have lost the ability to understand what is so fucking obvious.

There could be no better proof of the Federal Government's incompetency than with Social Security and Medicare. Both of these funds are near bankruptcy along with Medicade.

Even the senate cafeteria is in red ink. The U.S postal service is billions in red ink.

I could go on an on--but the Federal Government has never been the solution--they have always been the problem.

In TRUTH--the Federal Government couldn't operate a lemonade stand without driving it into bankruptcy. Yet, you liberals continue to look in their direction for SOLUTIONS.
 
Last edited:
By Geoffrey P. Hunt
08/30/2011
American Thinker


The left are now wringing their hands fearing their agenda is overripe, blaming everyone else for their own spoiled pickling. While Obama's sinking prospects for re-election are disquieting, the real source of liberals' despair is their sudden, unexpected realization that the progressive agenda is dead in its tracks and will likely be in full retreat after 2012.

. . . The end of the Progressive Era, eclipsing Obama, has come from two places -- one fiscal and pragmatic, the other ideological and visceral. First, the debt crisis and persistent economic woes have made it clear that the progressive agenda is unaffordable and unsustainable. The money pumps in the forms of more borrowing and taxes cannot possibly keep up with the tons of green water spending coming aboard.

Second, beyond the limited government ideology now gaining real traction, Americans without an ideology are finding that central planning madness from Washington is making their lives worse, not better.

. . . The liberal vision of the ideal state is fat, sloppy and lazy. Why exert yourself if someone else will buy you food stamps and school lunches? Why bother learning to read, write, do simple algebra, or acquire any employable skills when you'll get free health care and subsidized housing? Why eat right and keep fit when obesity and diabetes is a protected disability?

Americans are finally fed up with the Democrats' value system: no personal accountability; moral equivalence; belief that success is derived from exploiting everybody else; everybody else is a hapless victim; we are all racists and xenophobes, consigned to endless acts of contrition where reparations and open borders would be the only relief.


LINK
They say that private charitable organizations use most of their donations on administrative costs. Sometimes 70% or more.

With the government it's worse. When it comes to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other entitlements 75 cents out of every dollar goes to paying salaries, pensions, heating and AC, buying paper, computers, upkeep of facilities, etc.

The difference is that government doesn't make money it only spends it so it's all taken out of the treasury, and when that runs out it's ether borrowed or taxes are raised.

Since your not putting any links, I won't either.

I once read that the cost to the VA for patients care was 94 cent for every dollar. Only 6 cents per dollar was used on Administrative costs.

Think about Medicare. Health Care companies won't insure the elderly because they cost too much. If we didn't have Medicare, they would have to rely one Emergency Rooms, which by law, no one can be turned away. That means their care would be anywhere from 10 to 100 time greater than regular health care costs and the tax payer would be left to foot the bill. They have to anyway, but at a fraction of the cost using Medicare.

That's just the reality.

Anytime you introduce a "profit motive", the costs skyrocket. Why? Because there is a "profit motive". Republicans say, "Oh, well you'll have competition and that will drive down the costs". Only that hasn't happened. You have insurance company CEO's getting a hundred million dollar bonus and the number one cause of bankruptcy is "Medical Bills". More of the same doesn't make it better, it makes it worse.

Too bad Republicans have dined on that swill for so long. They have lost the ability to understand what is so fucking obvious.

So your claim is that government is more efficient and more cost effective.

You get more bang for your buck with big government then you do private companies?

OKay Sparky.

Oh, and your VA figures are way off.

What has changed in the last couple of years in Social Security and Medicare?

Nothing.

So explain why all of the sudden we go from a deficit of $169 billion in 08' to $1.2 trillion last year, and $1.6 trillion this year?

What has changed???
 
What Liberals Fear More Than Obama Losing...

is losing all the rich people they want to tax into oblivion to pay for their social agenda.

The only proposal I've heard of is raising the rate from 36% to 39%, the rate that they paided in the 90's. How is that "oblivion"?

You do realize that if you raise it to 100% it still wouldn't cover the current annual deficits?

It's a red herring.

Man, it's a good thing that nobody is talking about such idiocy.

Speaking of idiocy....

With that statement are you suggesting that any deficit reduction policy that doesn't cover the current annual deficits isn't worth doing?
 
So you were using "logic" and ended up with something entirely different?

What about the original question? Using "logic", the Tea Party hates socialism. Many from the Tea Party look old and fat. During interviews, many say they are on Social Security, get Medicare or Medicaid. Those are "socialistic" programs. Many are showing up at town halls to protest the Republican Leadership's position of wanting to end Medicare.

What the fuck are they protesting and why??????????????

Could the issue here be the fact we have a black president and they don't want to say they hate having a black president. So instead, they protest something they need and end up looking like "goons". Logically, that is probably the bottom line. Because nothing else they say has any logic.

Looking like goons????

Grandma?????

GOONS

assorted-goons-550x550.jpg
gunshine.jpg




Grandmas

samuelandallthegrandmas2.jpg

Three Grandmas? Are two of those a "lesbian couple"?

I was thinking the one in the middle must be the Great Grandmother.

Immie
 
What Liberals Fear More Than Obama Losing...

is losing all the rich people they want to tax into oblivion to pay for their social agenda.

The only proposal I've heard of is raising the rate from 36% to 39%, the rate that they paided in the 90's. How is that "oblivion"?

The 250K crowd right now pays 33% in Federal income tax liability.

WHAT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND----is that there are millions of S-corporations in the country--aka small business aka (mom and pop shops) that this President has continually threatened them with this 39% tax bracket. 39% is the EXACT same tax bracket that large multi-billion dollar corporations pay. John McCain tried to explain this to you -during the campaign season-but you didn't get it.

If you add in state and local taxes--you're talking about taxing the most innovative--hardest working people in this country. 50 cents on every dollar they earn.

In return small business in this country has tucked in like a turtle and are waiting for the threat to leave--and that threat is Barack Obama.

$economic-bottom.jpg
 
Last edited:
What Liberals Fear More Than Obama Losing...

is losing all the rich people they want to tax into oblivion to pay for their social agenda.

The only proposal I've heard of is raising the rate from 36% to 39%, the rate that they paided in the 90's. How is that "oblivion"?

The 250K crowd right now pays 33% in Federal income tax liability.

Here we go ....

WHAT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND----is that there are millions of S-corporations in the country--aka small business aka (mom and pop shops) that this President has continually threatened them with this 39% tax bracket. 39% is the EXACT same tax bracket that large multi-billion dollar corporations pay. John McCain tried to explain this to you -during the campaign season-but you didn't get it.

If you add in state and local taxes--you're talking about taxing the most innovative--hardest working people in this country. 50 cents on every dollar they earn.

3% of all small businesses make over $250K. Even if ALL of them made over $250K, they still would not pay 39%. Why?

Because they only pay that on the money over $250K!!

Why do people talk about tax brackets when they don't what they're talking about?
 
You realize Progressives are undefeated for nearly 100 years, right?

We have rolled back NONE of their agenda, not once, not ever. Reagan got a tax cut and defeated their home team, in response they took over the Democrat Party. We had a "Compassionate" " Conservative" president (he was neither) and a Republican Congress and we got Mo' n' Better Progressivism in the form of Prescription Drugs and Sabotage of our Educational System and the Patriot Act to boot.

We are getting our asses kicked daily and have been since 1913.

WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!!!

Agree. But the author is hopeful, and so am I, that we might have finally turned the tide.

Turned the tide? We are strill struggling to wake people up.

We haven't even begun the real work.

And there is going to be alot of pain before this is done. The only question is whether we voluntarily accept the pain to fix where we are or we have it forced upon us by events that will soon rage out of control.
 

Forum List

Back
Top