What is unconstitutional about what Trump proposes?

[RodISHI]

To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?

This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.

Banning any foreigner who could be a possible threat to the citizens from entering this country is not unconstitutional. Foreigners do not have protected rights in any manner to have free access to come in to this country for whatever reason.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

The government cannot discriminate based on religion. It's in the first amendment.

They'll do that pretzel logic thing where they'll say targeting certain people isnt discrimination. Followed by questions like "Whats discriminatory about it?".

Actually... granting illegals special privileges of achieving citizenship, over any other overseas immigrant that must endure the long process of achieving their legal right to become Americans as dictated under Federal Immigration law, would be deemed discriminatory.

Irrelevant to the argument.

Trump said he'd ban all Muslims, including Americans, from entering the country.

That's unconstitutional.

But the uneducated who support Trump don't seem to understand this very simple notion.

they are either uneducated or have NO respect for the constitution. They have no respect for the Laws that made this country strong ... so they deem themselves "patriots"

One day they diss Obama for being unconstitutional the next day they laud Trump for being unconstitutional.

Trump can run his campaign any way he chooses. Walking on the constitution should automatically end a campaign.

end of story.

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

 

[Contumacious]

They'll do that pretzel logic thing where they'll say targeting certain people isnt discrimination. Followed by questions like "Whats discriminatory about it?".

Actually... granting illegals special privileges of achieving citizenship, over any other overseas immigrant that must endure the long process of achieving their legal right to become Americans as dictated under Federal Immigration law, would be deemed discriminatory.

Irrelevant to the argument.

Trump said he'd ban all Muslims, including Americans, from entering the country.

That's unconstitutional.

But the uneducated who support Trump don't seem to understand this very simple notion.

they are either uneducated or have NO respect for the constitution. They have no respect for the Laws that made this country strong ... so they deem themselves "patriots"

One day they diss Obama for being unconstitutional the next day they laud Trump for being unconstitutional.

Trump can run his campaign any way he chooses. Walking on the constitution should automatically end a campaign.

end of story.

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Actually... granting illegals special privileges of achieving citizenship, over any other overseas immigrant that must endure the long process of achieving their legal right to become Americans as dictated under Federal Immigration law, would be deemed discriminatory.

Irrelevant to the argument.

Trump said he'd ban all Muslims, including Americans, from entering the country.

That's unconstitutional.

But the uneducated who support Trump don't seem to understand this very simple notion.

they are either uneducated or have NO respect for the constitution. They have no respect for the Laws that made this country strong ... so they deem themselves "patriots"

One day they diss Obama for being unconstitutional the next day they laud Trump for being unconstitutional.

Trump can run his campaign any way he chooses. Walking on the constitution should automatically end a campaign.

end of story.

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

 

[Contumacious]

Irrelevant to the argument.

Trump said he'd ban all Muslims, including Americans, from entering the country.

That's unconstitutional.

But the uneducated who support Trump don't seem to understand this very simple notion.

they are either uneducated or have NO respect for the constitution. They have no respect for the Laws that made this country strong ... so they deem themselves "patriots"

One day they diss Obama for being unconstitutional the next day they laud Trump for being unconstitutional.

Trump can run his campaign any way he chooses. Walking on the constitution should automatically end a campaign.

end of story.

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The government cannot discriminate based on religion. It's in the first amendment.

They'll do that pretzel logic thing where they'll say targeting certain people isnt discrimination. Followed by questions like "Whats discriminatory about it?".

Actually... granting illegals special privileges of achieving citizenship, over any other overseas immigrant that must endure the long process of achieving their legal right to become Americans as dictated under Federal Immigration law, would be deemed discriminatory.

Irrelevant to the argument.

Trump said he'd ban all Muslims, including Americans, from entering the country.

That's unconstitutional.

But the uneducated who support Trump don't seem to understand this very simple notion.

they are either uneducated or have NO respect for the constitution. They have no respect for the Laws that made this country strong ... so they deem themselves "patriots"

One day they diss Obama for being unconstitutional the next day they laud Trump for being unconstitutional.

Trump can run his campaign any way he chooses. Walking on the constitution should automatically end a campaign.

end of story.

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

Given your posting history – this post included – you're in no position to comment concerning anyone else being 'uneducated.'

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

they are either uneducated or have NO respect for the constitution. They have no respect for the Laws that made this country strong ... so they deem themselves "patriots"

One day they diss Obama for being unconstitutional the next day they laud Trump for being unconstitutional.

Trump can run his campaign any way he chooses. Walking on the constitution should automatically end a campaign.

end of story.

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous.

 

[Contumacious]

They'll do that pretzel logic thing where they'll say targeting certain people isnt discrimination. Followed by questions like "Whats discriminatory about it?".

Actually... granting illegals special privileges of achieving citizenship, over any other overseas immigrant that must endure the long process of achieving their legal right to become Americans as dictated under Federal Immigration law, would be deemed discriminatory.

Irrelevant to the argument.

Trump said he'd ban all Muslims, including Americans, from entering the country.

That's unconstitutional.

But the uneducated who support Trump don't seem to understand this very simple notion.

they are either uneducated or have NO respect for the constitution. They have no respect for the Laws that made this country strong ... so they deem themselves "patriots"

One day they diss Obama for being unconstitutional the next day they laud Trump for being unconstitutional.

Trump can run his campaign any way he chooses. Walking on the constitution should automatically end a campaign.

end of story.

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

Given your posting history – this post included – you're in no position to comment concerning anyone else being 'uneducated.'

AMAZING COMMENT , GIVEN THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO REBUT OR REFUTE ANY OF MY POSTS. I DO UNDERSTANT YOUR BITTERNESS., THOUGH

GO BACK TO NIGHT SCHOOL.


.

 

[Contumacious]

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous.

REPEATING

REBUT/REFUTE OR SHUT THE FUCK UP.

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.

 

[Dana7360]

The government cannot discriminate based on religion. It's in the first amendment.

Not when referring to immigration. Hell, those people aren't even CITIZENS.

Trump said he would include Muslim American

He couldn't do anything about citizens, legally. He, with Congress, can stop immigration if they want. They could stop importing jews and homos if they wanted.

What Trump proposes is to ban ALL Muslims from coming into America, including American citizens.

That is unconstitutional because of the first amendment and answers the OP.

End of thread.

I call BULLSHIT, show us!

Many people and myself have done so.

I posted an article from the Washington Post that most certainly includes trumps words that ALL muslims including American citizens would not be allowed into the country. I'm sure there's a lot of other credible news sources publishing the same truth.

You just didn't read it.

Just because you don't want to see the truth doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

It means that you don't want truth.

 

[RodISHI]

they are either uneducated or have NO respect for the constitution. They have no respect for the Laws that made this country strong ... so they deem themselves "patriots"

One day they diss Obama for being unconstitutional the next day they laud Trump for being unconstitutional.

Trump can run his campaign any way he chooses. Walking on the constitution should automatically end a campaign.

end of story.

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

Maybe you should do some reading;
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...WlxBhWCEj1B2E-Fsw&sig2=Q2wf_RHq8KSnmUkHoGm7TA

 

[Dana7360]

Was it unconstitutional when President Jimmy Carter banned Iranians from entering the USA during the hostage crisis?

No.

Banning citizens of a country from entering- whether its from Iran or Cuba or North Korea is perfectly Constitutional

Banning persons based solely upon their religion is not.

Now- can you tell the difference between an Iranian and a Muslim?

You still are not grasping who Carter banned....hint: religion played a part...so did medical necessity

Feel free to fill me in.

I can see that there is embargo on issuing visa's to Iranians but nothing about religion.

It is the same, the majority of Iranians were Muslim. Call it what it is. If it was okay then, why is it not okay now? At least be consistent.

It's not.

For it to be the same thing ALL muslims from ANY nation had to be banned by Carter. That would have had to include American muslims.

He didn't ban anyone based on their religion. He did it based on nationality.

You can lie all you want. You can make all the excuses you want. It still isn't honest and true reality.

 

[Contumacious]

NO FUCKTARD - YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS UNEDUCATED AND SHOW NO RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OR FOR YOUR FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS


1- In 1949 , in order to grandstand for the powerful zionut lobby, Truman dispossessed or made homeless 1,500,000 Palestinians - who with a stroke of a pen became foreigners in their own land

2- The US has given Israhell over $130 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBillion dollars which have been used to perpetrate the Palestinian Holocaust

3- In order to continue to grandstand for the zionut lobby in 1990 the US invaded Iraq where it slaughtered millions of women and children - and remained in that Country for 18 years

4- In 2015 Obama invaded Syria where it has completely destroyed that country forcing the Syrians to become international refugees.

.

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

Maybe you should do some reading;
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiT3ZCP7M3JAhVC6GMKHaYlCj4QFggkMAE&url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHqPkrtpWwvFWlxBhWCEj1B2E-Fsw&sig2=Q2wf_RHq8KSnmUkHoGm7TA

MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO SOME READING


"4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force."


Thomas Jefferson


.

 

[Dana7360]

The government cannot discriminate based on religion. It's in the first amendment.

Not when referring to immigration. Hell, those people aren't even CITIZENS.

Trump said he would include Muslim American

He couldn't do anything about citizens, legally. He, with Congress, can stop immigration if they want. They could stop importing jews and homos if they wanted.

What Trump proposes is to ban ALL Muslims from coming into America, including American citizens.

That is unconstitutional because of the first amendment and answers the OP.

End of thread.

I call EXTREME BULLSHIT, show us! Show us where he wants to prevent Americans. SHOW US!

How lazy can you be?

I've already posted it.

You're so lazy you can't click a link and read the article?

Ok I'll spoon feed it to you.

Directly from the article at the Washington Post:

The GOP presidential candidate on Monday called for a “total and complete shutdown” of Muslims entering the United States, including immigrants, tourists and even Muslims who are U.S. citizens and travel abroad. His plan to bar U.S. citizens drew particular ire from legal experts, some of whom fumbled for words as they tried to explain its illegality, since none had considered the matter before.

Since I've posted the link once already, I'm not going to post it again. It's a waste of time. I already know you won't read it.

 

[RodISHI]

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

Maybe you should do some reading;
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiT3ZCP7M3JAhVC6GMKHaYlCj4QFggkMAE&url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHqPkrtpWwvFWlxBhWCEj1B2E-Fsw&sig2=Q2wf_RHq8KSnmUkHoGm7TA

MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO SOME READING


"4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force."


Thomas Jefferson


.

Sorry bud your not up to date....Nice to see you got urself an old book though.

SEC. 212. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, the following classes of aliens shall be ineligible to receive visas and shall be excluded from admission into the United States: (1) Aliens who are feeble-minded; (2) Aliens who are insane; (3) Aliens who have had one or more attacks of insanity; (4) Aliens afflicted with psychopathic personality, epilepsy, or a mental defect; (5) Aliens who are narcotic drug addicts or chronic alcoholics; (6) Aliens who are afflicted with tuberculosis in an}' form, or with leprosy, or any dangerous contagious disease; (7) Aliens not comprehended within any of the foregoing classes who are certified by the examining surgeon as having a physical defect, disease, or disability, w^hen determined by the consular or immigration officer to be of such a nature that it may affect the ability of the alien to earn a living, unless the alien affirmatively establishes that he will not have to earn a living; (8) Aliens who are paupers, professional beggars, or vagrants; (9) Aliens who have been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (other than a purely political offense), or aliens who admit having committed such a crime, or aliens who admit committing acts which constitute the essential elements of such a crime...................etc. etc. etc............

 

[Ame®icano]

Emphasis on what he proposes...not what a bunch of shriek ears say he proposes.


Trump's ban on Muslim entry to the U.S. would be unconstitutional, experts say: Donald Trump in the news

What's unconstitutional?

Nothing. It's been done before and nobody complained.

Flashback: The Obama Administration Stopped Processing Iraq Refugee Requests For 6 Months In 2011

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If I had no respect for the constitution I wouldn't be coming up with excuses not to follow federal immigration laws. Laws every other overseas immigrant follows. Why is it exactly that democrats don't give a crap at all about the protection of its own citizens that they are willing to chance a terrorist taking advantage of an open border? It's no wonder this nation isn't any safer than it was when President Obama first took office.

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

Maybe you should do some reading;
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiT3ZCP7M3JAhVC6GMKHaYlCj4QFggkMAE&url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHqPkrtpWwvFWlxBhWCEj1B2E-Fsw&sig2=Q2wf_RHq8KSnmUkHoGm7TA

MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO SOME READING


"4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force."


Thomas Jefferson


.

At least you're consistent at being ridiculous and wrong.

 

[Contumacious]

AS SHOWN THE US IS COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIDEAST TURMOIL.

AND THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.


.

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

Maybe you should do some reading;
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiT3ZCP7M3JAhVC6GMKHaYlCj4QFggkMAE&url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHqPkrtpWwvFWlxBhWCEj1B2E-Fsw&sig2=Q2wf_RHq8KSnmUkHoGm7TA

MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO SOME READING


"4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force."


Thomas Jefferson


.

Sorry bud your not up to date....Nice to see you got urself an old book though.

SEC. 212. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, the following classes of aliens shall be ineligible to receive visas and shall be excluded from admission into the United States: (1) Aliens who are feeble-minded; (2) Aliens who are insane; (3) Aliens who have had one or more attacks of insanity; (4) Aliens afflicted with psychopathic personality, epilepsy, or a mental defect; (5) Aliens who are narcotic drug addicts or chronic alcoholics; (6) Aliens who are afflicted with tuberculosis in an}' form, or with leprosy, or any dangerous contagious disease; (7) Aliens not comprehended within any of the foregoing classes who are certified by the examining surgeon as having a physical defect, disease, or disability, w^hen determined by the consular or immigration officer to be of such a nature that it may affect the ability of the alien to earn a living, unless the alien affirmatively establishes that he will not have to earn a living; (8) Aliens who are paupers, professional beggars, or vagrants; (9) Aliens who have been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (other than a purely political offense), or aliens who admit having committed such a crime, or aliens who admit committing acts which constitute the essential elements of such a crime...................etc. etc. etc............

MR DINGLE BERRY


IN ORDER FOR SEC 212 TO BE VALID THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE AMENDED


WHEN WAS THE CONSTITUTION AMENDED AND WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF THE AMENDMENT ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

THAT IS ALL I WANT TO KNOW

.

 

[RodISHI]

Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.

- See more at: Federal vs. State Immigration Laws - FindLaw

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

Maybe you should do some reading;
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiT3ZCP7M3JAhVC6GMKHaYlCj4QFggkMAE&url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHqPkrtpWwvFWlxBhWCEj1B2E-Fsw&sig2=Q2wf_RHq8KSnmUkHoGm7TA

MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO SOME READING


"4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force."


Thomas Jefferson


.

Sorry bud your not up to date....Nice to see you got urself an old book though.

SEC. 212. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, the following classes of aliens shall be ineligible to receive visas and shall be excluded from admission into the United States: (1) Aliens who are feeble-minded; (2) Aliens who are insane; (3) Aliens who have had one or more attacks of insanity; (4) Aliens afflicted with psychopathic personality, epilepsy, or a mental defect; (5) Aliens who are narcotic drug addicts or chronic alcoholics; (6) Aliens who are afflicted with tuberculosis in an}' form, or with leprosy, or any dangerous contagious disease; (7) Aliens not comprehended within any of the foregoing classes who are certified by the examining surgeon as having a physical defect, disease, or disability, w^hen determined by the consular or immigration officer to be of such a nature that it may affect the ability of the alien to earn a living, unless the alien affirmatively establishes that he will not have to earn a living; (8) Aliens who are paupers, professional beggars, or vagrants; (9) Aliens who have been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (other than a purely political offense), or aliens who admit having committed such a crime, or aliens who admit committing acts which constitute the essential elements of such a crime...................etc. etc. etc............

MR DINGLE BERRY


IN ORDER FOR SEC 212 TO BE VALID THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE AMENDED


WHEN WAS THE CONSTITUTION AMENDED AND WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF THE AMENDMENT ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

THAT IS ALL I WANT TO KNOW

.

As your hero says, "What does it matter". Sorry not here to do your research. Denying access to anyone who is not a citizen is not illegal.

 

[Contumacious]

THAT IS BULLSHIT AND A BOLD FACE USURPATION


FEDGOV WAS ONLY AUTHORIZED TO ******NATURALIZE****** CITIZENS BUT NO AUTHORITY TO INTERDICT , DETAIN AND DEPORT WAS EVER GRANTED


THE POWER REMAINED WITH THE 50 STATES.


.

Maybe you should do some reading;
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiT3ZCP7M3JAhVC6GMKHaYlCj4QFggkMAE&url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-66/pdf/STATUTE-66-Pg163.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHqPkrtpWwvFWlxBhWCEj1B2E-Fsw&sig2=Q2wf_RHq8KSnmUkHoGm7TA

MAYBE YOU SHOULD DO SOME READING


"4. _Resolved_, That alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection of the laws of the State wherein they are: that no power over them has been delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power over citizens. And it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," the act of the Congress of the United States, passed on the -- day of July, 1798, intituled "An Act concerning aliens," which assumes powers over alien friends, not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void, and of no force."


Thomas Jefferson


.

Sorry bud your not up to date....Nice to see you got urself an old book though.

SEC. 212. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, the following classes of aliens shall be ineligible to receive visas and shall be excluded from admission into the United States: (1) Aliens who are feeble-minded; (2) Aliens who are insane; (3) Aliens who have had one or more attacks of insanity; (4) Aliens afflicted with psychopathic personality, epilepsy, or a mental defect; (5) Aliens who are narcotic drug addicts or chronic alcoholics; (6) Aliens who are afflicted with tuberculosis in an}' form, or with leprosy, or any dangerous contagious disease; (7) Aliens not comprehended within any of the foregoing classes who are certified by the examining surgeon as having a physical defect, disease, or disability, w^hen determined by the consular or immigration officer to be of such a nature that it may affect the ability of the alien to earn a living, unless the alien affirmatively establishes that he will not have to earn a living; (8) Aliens who are paupers, professional beggars, or vagrants; (9) Aliens who have been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (other than a purely political offense), or aliens who admit having committed such a crime, or aliens who admit committing acts which constitute the essential elements of such a crime...................etc. etc. etc............

MR DINGLE BERRY


IN ORDER FOR SEC 212 TO BE VALID THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE AMENDED


WHEN WAS THE CONSTITUTION AMENDED AND WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF THE AMENDMENT ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

THAT IS ALL I WANT TO KNOW

.

As your hero says, "What does it matter". Sorry not here to do your research. Denying access to anyone who is not a citizen is not illegal.

MAYBE NOT IN CUBA VENEZUELA OR IN YOUR NECK OF THE WOOD---ISRAHELL.