What is the real reason that the GOP does not want a deal with Iran?

[Liminal]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So the obvious conclusion of your logic is that negotiations are pointless and war is the inevitable solution. Does that sound about right?

No, not at all.... no one, except the left is talking about war.

Horse shit.

 

[JimH52]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So when do we attack, George W?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So the obvious conclusion of your logic is that negotiations are pointless and war is the inevitable solution. Does that sound about right?

No, not at all.... no one, except the left is talking about war.

Horse shit.

Wow.. what a well thought out response. Looka, why do the Iranians want a nuke? Nobody is attacking them, or has attacked them.. matter of fact, it is they who are sponsoring proxy wars all across the globe... it is they who attacked our embassy and held U.S. citizens hostage for over a year. So again, why would they want a nuke if not for offensive purposes? To defend against Israel? That's laughable... only an idiot would trust those crazies.

 

[JimH52]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So the obvious conclusion of your logic is that negotiations are pointless and war is the inevitable solution. Does that sound about right?

No, not at all.... no one, except the left is talking about war.

Yes, with your speaker talking about an "anti-war_ President.....funny

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So when do we attack, George W?

Uhm, why do you moonbats always resort to the war drums? That's not really an option at this juncture.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So the obvious conclusion of your logic is that negotiations are pointless and war is the inevitable solution. Does that sound about right?

No, not at all.... no one, except the left is talking about war.

Yes, with your speaker talking about an "anti-war_ President.....funny

Uhm, what? What does that mean?

 

[JimH52]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So when do we attack, George W?

Uhm, why do you moonbats always resort to the war drums? That's not really an option at this juncture.

Right, so let them continue to work behind our backs with no monitors and see how long it takes to get a bomb. THEN WE ATTACK, RIGHT?

 

[JimH52]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So the obvious conclusion of your logic is that negotiations are pointless and war is the inevitable solution. Does that sound about right?

No, not at all.... no one, except the left is talking about war.

Yes, with your speaker talking about an "anti-war_ President.....funny

Uhm, what? What does that mean?

Have you been living on Mars?

Boehner Obama is an anti-war president TheHill

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So the obvious conclusion of your logic is that negotiations are pointless and war is the inevitable solution. Does that sound about right?

No, not at all.... no one, except the left is talking about war.

Yes, with your speaker talking about an "anti-war_ President.....funny

Uhm, what? What does that mean?

Have you been living on Mars?

Boehner Obama is an anti-war president TheHill

Did you even read your citation?

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Thursday blasted President Obama as an "anti-war president," saying the commander-in-chief is not doing enough to battle terrorist groups like the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Nowhere does anyone talk about going to war with Iran... geeze you're not too bright are ya?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So when do we attack, George W?

Uhm, why do you moonbats always resort to the war drums? That's not really an option at this juncture.

Right, so let them continue to work behind our backs with no monitors and see how long it takes to get a bomb. THEN WE ATTACK, RIGHT?

Where did I say that? Can you read?

 

[healthmyths]

I have a hard time accepting that the GOP would carry us to war just to enhance their chances to win the White House.

There has never been except from Obama a discussion of war with Iran. It is not necessary.
The sanctions are working while else is Iran in negotiations? So why give up that one effective tool?
HOLD on to the premise that the 4th largest oil producer in the world DOESN"T need nuclear power to supply energy to their people!
FACT.

 

[healthmyths]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So when do we attack, George W?

Uhm, why do you moonbats always resort to the war drums? That's not really an option at this juncture.

Right, so let them continue to work behind our backs with no monitors and see how long it takes to get a bomb. THEN WE ATTACK, RIGHT?

Then tighten the sanctions. simple.

 

[KGB]

Republicans want to stop a nuclear deal with Iran. They may have ensured Obama gets one Comment is free The Guardian


"If no deal is reached, what does the Senate GOP think will happen? Peace on earth and goodwill to men? Iran will continue to build up its nuclear program, and the world will eventually face a stark choice between Iran being a screwdriver’s turn away from a nuclear bomb, or using its own traditional bombs inIranand starting a disastrous war."

So what is the reason the GOP does not want a deal with Iran? There is one HUGE reason and it has nothing to do with security, world peace, or even Iran. The GOP does not want to give Obama another victory. They know if Obama gets a deal with Iran, their chances of winning the WH go down to near 0%. It is all a repub political game.

They're making a huge mistake.

The senate doesn't have to approve the agreement. They just have to advise.

The large majority of the people in America want an agreement and don't want war. If the republicans do anything more to prevent this agreement they will have a nation of very angry people to deal with and it won't be pretty.

But the republicans aren't that smart. They're just acting like spoiled brat children. So I don't expect them to make the right choices and they will regret it.

Oh, we want an agreement and don't want a war. We just want competent people to negotiate the deal and the right to reject a bad deal.

And we know just how effective Republicans have been with negotiations like that in the past. North Korea being case in point.

That deal was negotiated by the Clinton Administration with Jimmy Carter leading the charge....

 

[Skylar]

They want to 'win', imagining a degree of control and influence over the situation that simply doesn't exist.

 

[Skylar]

I have a hard time accepting that the GOP would carry us to war just to enhance their chances to win the White House.

There has never been except from Obama a discussion of war with Iran. It is not necessary.
The sanctions are working while else is Iran in negotiations? So why give up that one effective tool?
HOLD on to the premise that the 4th largest oil producer in the world DOESN"T need nuclear power to supply energy to their people!
FACT.

Whether or not they 'need' it, they have a right to it. Imagining they don't doesn't change the fact that they do.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Republicans want to stop a nuclear deal with Iran. They may have ensured Obama gets one Comment is free The Guardian


"If no deal is reached, what does the Senate GOP think will happen? Peace on earth and goodwill to men? Iran will continue to build up its nuclear program, and the world will eventually face a stark choice between Iran being a screwdriver’s turn away from a nuclear bomb, or using its own traditional bombs inIranand starting a disastrous war."

So what is the reason the GOP does not want a deal with Iran? There is one HUGE reason and it has nothing to do with security, world peace, or even Iran. The GOP does not want to give Obama another victory. They know if Obama gets a deal with Iran, their chances of winning the WH go down to near 0%. It is all a repub political game.

So what is the reason the GOP does not want a deal with Iran?

Because the mullahs can't be trusted, and Obama is a sucky negotiater.

 

[Liminal]

Another country of lunatics that can't be reasoned with....
neither NK or Iran can be expected to abide by any agreement that is not strictly enforced.
North Korea should show you that.

So the obvious conclusion of your logic is that negotiations are pointless and war is the inevitable solution. Does that sound about right?

No, not at all.... no one, except the left is talking about war.

Horse shit.

Wow.. what a well thought out response. Looka, why do the Iranians want a nuke? Nobody is attacking them, or has attacked them.. matter of fact, it is they who are sponsoring proxy wars all across the globe... it is they who attacked our embassy and held U.S. citizens hostage for over a year. So again, why would they want a nuke if not for offensive purposes? To defend against Israel? That's laughable... only an idiot would trust those crazies.

Perhaps dog shit would be a more accurate description.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Republicans want to stop a nuclear deal with Iran. They may have ensured Obama gets one Comment is free The Guardian


"If no deal is reached, what does the Senate GOP think will happen? Peace on earth and goodwill to men? Iran will continue to build up its nuclear program, and the world will eventually face a stark choice between Iran being a screwdriver’s turn away from a nuclear bomb, or using its own traditional bombs inIranand starting a disastrous war."

So what is the reason the GOP does not want a deal with Iran? There is one HUGE reason and it has nothing to do with security, world peace, or even Iran. The GOP does not want to give Obama another victory. They know if Obama gets a deal with Iran, their chances of winning the WH go down to near 0%. It is all a repub political game.

We want a good deal. One which will prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
We don't believe President obama can or even wants, to make such a deal.

Doesn't "want" a deal? What makes you believe that? Watch this and tell me where he says that.
President Obama s full remarks announcing a framework for a nuclear deal with Iran - The Washington Post

 

[Liminal]

Republicans want to stop a nuclear deal with Iran. They may have ensured Obama gets one Comment is free The Guardian


"If no deal is reached, what does the Senate GOP think will happen? Peace on earth and goodwill to men? Iran will continue to build up its nuclear program, and the world will eventually face a stark choice between Iran being a screwdriver’s turn away from a nuclear bomb, or using its own traditional bombs inIranand starting a disastrous war."

So what is the reason the GOP does not want a deal with Iran? There is one HUGE reason and it has nothing to do with security, world peace, or even Iran. The GOP does not want to give Obama another victory. They know if Obama gets a deal with Iran, their chances of winning the WH go down to near 0%. It is all a repub political game.

They're making a huge mistake.

The senate doesn't have to approve the agreement. They just have to advise.

The large majority of the people in America want an agreement and don't want war. If the republicans do anything more to prevent this agreement they will have a nation of very angry people to deal with and it won't be pretty.

But the republicans aren't that smart. They're just acting like spoiled brat children. So I don't expect them to make the right choices and they will regret it.

Oh, we want an agreement and don't want a war. We just want competent people to negotiate the deal and the right to reject a bad deal.

And we know just how effective Republicans have been with negotiations like that in the past. North Korea being case in point.

That deal was negotiated by the Clinton Administration with Jimmy Carter leading the charge....

Who was President when North Korea tested their first nuclear weapon? I can't seem to remember, who was it again?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Look at North Korea. We dickered around with them for years with sanctions on and sanctions off. What happened? Did they walk away from their nuclear program? No, they now have a weapon. This deal will put inspectors on the ground and Iran will drastically cut its centrifuge program. With no deal, Iran continues unchecked. Maybe that is what the GOP wants, now that they are pen pals with the Mullah in Tehran...

And..We get that deal for 15 YEARS!