candycorn
Diamond Member
Both were contractors who released classified information?
Is there any great difference between what either did?
Is there any great difference between what either did?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.Both were contractors who released classified information?
Is there any great difference between what either did?
I agree "leaking" and "whistleblowing" are one and the same, as far as the actual actions.Both were contractors who released classified information?
Is there any great difference between what either did?
I agree "leaking" and "whistleblowing" are one and the same, as far as the actual actions.Both were contractors who released classified information?
Is there any great difference between what either did?
I don't understand why Winner leaked information that seems to have been pretty much in the public domain already? The place she sent it must have wanted real "documentation" instead of "anonymous sources," I guess. So the Trumpbots would believe it. It doesn't sound like she actually screwed the pooch, security wise. I know that doesn't matter, but it matters.
and vice versa..I think many will say that Snowden is an American hero because he uncovered illegal policies of the Obama Adminstration, while Winner is a filthy traitor because she leaked national secrets that made the Trump Adminstration look bad.
.
I don't disagree. She should get what she deserves, but I'm still confused what it was for. Maybe someday after the trial, we'll find out.I agree "leaking" and "whistleblowing" are one and the same, as far as the actual actions.Both were contractors who released classified information?
Is there any great difference between what either did?
I don't understand why Winner leaked information that seems to have been pretty much in the public domain already? The place she sent it must have wanted real "documentation" instead of "anonymous sources," I guess. So the Trumpbots would believe it. It doesn't sound like she actually screwed the pooch, security wise. I know that doesn't matter, but it matters.
Secrets are secret…one does not get to decide why they are secret. Sometimes the information is not the secret—the source is.
Good luck proving that one.Winner leaked faked and doctored information
Snowden is a criminal...period. Whatever justification one has for breaking the law does not erase the fact that the law was broken.I think many will say that Snowden is an American hero because he uncovered illegal policies of the Obama Adminstration, while Winner is a filthy traitor because she leaked national secrets that made the Trump Adminstration look bad.
My opinion is that these people wouldn't leak anything if the government was doing everything legally.
link?Winner leaked faked and doctored information
Long before then. The report is much more important than she is.I don't disagree. She should get what she deserves, but I'm still confused what it was for. Maybe someday after the trial, we'll find out.I agree "leaking" and "whistleblowing" are one and the same, as far as the actual actions.Both were contractors who released classified information?
Is there any great difference between what either did?
I don't understand why Winner leaked information that seems to have been pretty much in the public domain already? The place she sent it must have wanted real "documentation" instead of "anonymous sources," I guess. So the Trumpbots would believe it. It doesn't sound like she actually screwed the pooch, security wise. I know that doesn't matter, but it matters.
Secrets are secret…one does not get to decide why they are secret. Sometimes the information is not the secret—the source is.
Try calling someone a traitor only when they do something traitorous.Our govt does crazy shit to us and our allies and other countries. People call them traitors when they bring it to the public..
Who is the REAL traitor? The govt is supposed to work for US
Secrets are secret…one does not get to decide why they are secret. Sometimes the information is not the secret—the source is.
Yeah, and recently we learned Obama and his administration spied on millions of Americans during his 8 years in office....Our govt does crazy shit to us and our allies and other countries. People call them traitors when they bring it to the public..
Who is the REAL traitor? The govt is supposed to work for US
No. They should both be shot.Both were contractors who released classified information?
Is there any great difference between what either did?