Woodznutz
Platinum Member
- Dec 9, 2021
- 20,704
- 9,903
- 473
Where do molecules come from?I did ... methane into ethane ... once we agree this is true, then we can discuss the mechanism ... it's a collision between molecules ... same as DNA ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where do molecules come from?I did ... methane into ethane ... once we agree this is true, then we can discuss the mechanism ... it's a collision between molecules ... same as DNA ...
What your point?You didn't understand it? ...
... and you agree with the mechanism? ... because it's exactly the same in a cell's nucleus ... a collision ...
So you pretend to have considered the evidence.Where do molecules come from?
My questions are aimed at getting to the bottom of things. You guys always start in the middle. It's like me asking a person where he came from, and him saying "Never mind that, I'm here now."No, if you mean it depends on chemical reactions, then I clearly agreed and agree now.
Stop trying to make excuses for why you don't have any arguments. It won't work for you.
The whole article was speculation. Of course, I understood it. It was no different than a hundred other such articles that I've read about evolution.You didn't understand it? ...
Where do molecules come from?
Can you explain the mechanism, field values, and chemistry as it relates to the ToE? How many blackboards filled with equations are needed to explain even the smallest evolutionary change, as well as the odds of success? No assumptions allowed.Do you agree with the mechanism? ... this is about chemistry, these field values you ask for are over your head ...
The whole article was speculation. Of course, I understood it. It was no different than a hundred other such articles that I've read about evolution.
Genesis reveals special creation, not evolution. If there were similar creatures in the past, they too were products of special creation. They perished in one of the many ruin/restoration cycles that earth has gone through, and their particular genes perished with them.Okay ... I didn't read the paper myself ... how do you disprove the conjectures made? ... you've seen the physical evidence they've provided ... why would there be fossils of non-dam building proto-beavers if there was no such thing as proto-beavers ...
Genesis is clear on the matter ... do you have an alternative theory? ...
Can you explain the mechanism, field values, and chemistry as it relates to the ToE? How many blackboards filled with equations are needed to explain even the smallest evolutionary change, as well as the odds of success?
Genesis reveals special creation, not evolution. If there were similar creatures in the past they perished in one of the many ruin/restoration cycles that earth has gone through, and their particular genes perished with them.
Just explain how it relates to evolution.The mechanism is a collision ... all molecules have kinetic energy ... so they're always moving about violently ... if the direction and speed is right, these collisions can result in a chemical bond forming ... methane into ethane ... or methane into DNA ...
Did you take high school chemistry? ... because I'm not going to type all that in for you ... please stop asking ... google it or buy a textbook ...
You're missing the whole point.Genesis reveals special creation, not evolution. If there were similar creatures in the past they perished in one of the many ruin/restoration cycles that earth has gone through, and their particular genes perished with them.
Just explain how it relates to evolution.
Nonsense. If you have a decent point, it doesn't rely on others' answers to questions.My questions are aimed at getting to the bottom of things.
No.Just explain how it relates to evolution.
Genesis reveals special creation, not evolution.
If there were similar creatures in the past, they too were products of special creation. They perished in one of the many ruin/restoration cycles that earth has gone through, and their particular genes perished with them.
Sorry, but the ruin periods of earth's history eliminates the possibility of millions of years of uninterrupted evolution. The sudden appearance in the geologic record of new organisms also supports this as well.Horseshit.
Bible literalists are on a dangerous path, because they don't understand what they're being told.
Genesis says "God created", it doesn't say a single word about HOW He did it.
If you're imagining that God snapped his fingers and created a fish in a capricious and whimsical way, that's YOU inserting stuff into the text that isn't there.
Science has discovered that God's method was evolution. (And still is). There is not a single word in the Bible that says it isn't so.
What a bizarre lie.Sorry, but the ruin periods of earth's history eliminates the possibility of millions of years of uninterrupted evolution.