playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 55,627
- 48,059
- 3,645
.
.
Well ... If "please" didn't work, I guess all I can say is "sorry" you felt compelled to tell me.
Take Care and Have a Lovely Evening
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
.
.
Well ... If "please" didn't work, I guess all I can say is "sorry" you felt compelled to tell me.
Take Care and Have a Lovely Evening
.
Your OP was a lot of words to say "feminism is abortion."
We get it, you're a single issue ghoul.
^^^ says the poorly educated dupe that donny loves long time...
Catty is not my thing. Well, at least not to other women.sounds rather catty - but alrighty.
Sure thing toots. Keep spreading your ass cheeks for the dems. You are so better off....
Catty is not my thing. Well, at least not to other women.
'cept i'm not a (D). i bet i've voted for more (R)s than you could ever vote across parties. just because you are a partisan stooge, don't ASSume everybody else is.
Bullshit.
You morons think you can fool people, but we all KNOW you are hard core commie/progressive, uneducated loon.
negatory, dan-O.
paranoia will destroyaaaaaaaaaaaa.............
I'll go with socialism as known everywhere in the world outside the English speaking savage capitalism brainwash. In other words, fair capitalism with a living wage healthcare daycare paid parentally cheap college and training great infrastructure and vacations and mainly taxing the rich. Change the channel. Rupert Murdoch and Joe Rogan etc are are garbage.I know what it is.
But Marx's ideology for salvation was built on Hagel's foundation.
Ironically, like so many of the social justice warriors in modern society who really don't understand Marxism but think they do, Marx himself never did explain how communism would rise after the destruction of so-called capitalism. Nor did Marx ever explain how the State would wither away after the dictatorship of the proletariat began. Marx, like so many modern social justice warriors, just assumed that increasing government power was the path to liberating society or humanity itself.
Did that stop Lenin from decreeing that liberty was so precious that it should be rationed? Heh heh. Please. Of course not.
Of course, all of that goes back to what Black Sand was saying about having to literally reverse everything the other poster believes, their very religion, in order that they begin to understand the fatal error in subjugating society to petty government officials in the name of ending so-called class struggle.
There's much to be said about this. And it's directly germane to the topic at hand. But I think that to actually have that discussion in any fruitful manner requires a completely different thread. It's an intellectual discussion. And not one of those 'official Marxism thread because I say it's the official Marxism thread and, oh, btw, here are the terms of controversy, also because I say so'
Discussion like that demands an unbiased, historical basis, germane to modern politics, except thoroughly, not just premised on and limited to promoting the means of making pet social issues applicable while demonizing any notion of ever touching on the ends and subsequent consequence.
And that's not even taking into consideration the fact that there is such a major shortcoming in society with definitions and understandings of what kinds of policies we actually have in America.
In fact, it's almost as laughable as it is disturbing to see so many arguments over capitalism versus socialism. The argument itself is completely irrelevant to the kinds of policies we actually have. We're Keynesians. Thoroughly. What we have is central economic planning by a central bank. We have economic interventionism. We have a planned economy. We have a welfare state. We have inflationism. A belief in deficit finance.
That entire system is completely removed from any semblance of free-market capitalism. Yet...we see arguments over socialism versus capitalism. Do you not understand how stupid that is?
The only purpose it serves is to say, disingenuously I might add, that, oh, look, capitalism is so bad that what we surely must need is socialism.
The entire argument is rigged and meant to keep people stupid to what kinds of policies we actually do have while the Keynesians, with their close ties to government, and who keep it going, get all of that freshly printed currency first and get to insert it into the economy in a way tha tonly benefits them before it is ever affected by inflation, and they're laughing all the way to the central bank.
That right there is where all of the so-called 'class struggle' comes from. But it won't be until people actually grasp proper definitions and understanding of what kinds of policies we actually have until serious, fruitful discussion can be had. I, for one, am not holding my breath.
Incel.Indeed. Women tennis players are far inferior to men tennis players. The 203rd ranked male beat both Williams sisters in one day, just for practice. He said "I had to play down to the level of 500 just to keep it fun." That's the qualitative difference.
Now men play 5 sets in the U.S. Open while women play only 3, and far inferior sets at that. But they get the vaunted "equal pay" for very unequal work.
Make all the excuses you want about that. They will avail you and "feminists"(sic) nothing.
Feminists (sic) also never complain about brick layers being 99% men. Get out there and sweat, "ladies." Work your asses off and bring the percentage up to where it's "fair."
Odd how everywhere i post, you respond. You arent stalking me now are you boy?Yeah, jake. We already know you are INCEL.
Your fat head. Always gets in your way.That may apply on an INDIVIDUAL basis, but not on a GENERAL basis, man or woman. For instance, some women are especially strong for women with nerves of steel and excellent eye-hand coordination. So yeah, I might consider her for combat duty if she was so inclined. That does not mean that Whoopi Goldberg should be a sergeant in the Marines leading a front-line combat mission just because she's a girl too.
Only an idiot like you thinks any person has free choice of any career they might think of, much less that their SEX alone qualifies them.
INTEREST in a field of career is one thing, go for it, but a far cry from necessarily being QUALIFIED.
Odd how everywhere i post, you respond. You arent stalking me now are you boy?
And aren't ALL guys "creepy" - really........They have to be. How else are they supposed to get away from creepy guys?
I am a single working woman. Does that make me feminist? I never thought of myself as feminist. I do respect men's role in society. They did have to fight the wars.
Women were in combat in the 1948 war for independence but not in combat units after that. One reason is women soldiers on the battlefield encourages the Arabs to fight us hard because they do not want the shame of surrendering to women.I AM looking at Israel. The ISRAELI studies show that the effectiveness of combat units drops substantially when women are in them. However, like I also said, if they are pilots, or artillery, or some other technical branch the problems are diminished.
Penis-Envy PiranhasRegardless how hard you try, once you are accused of Sexual Misconduct, you will lose your career without any reasonable investigation.
If you are a victim of Domestic Violence, you are more likely to be arrested then helped.
Representation Is a Re-Presentation of Age-Old Elitist Tyranny. That's Why Communist Governments Call Themselves "Republics"That's not going to happen. This abortion legislation will bite them in the ass. At most it will temporarily be a hindrance.