- Thread starter
- #41
Well aren't you the legal genius. Must be a genetic thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well aren't you the legal genius. Must be a genetic thing.
Well aren't you the legal genius. Must be a genetic thing.
They're trying to use a federal crime to base it off of.
This is a case they should have charged 3 years ago,
34 felony counts sounds impressive until you mention that they are all the same exact crime, which is called piling on offenses to make them seem worse than they really are. These are accounting errors. Worst you should be able to do is force him to pay a fine, but the Biden DOJ, which is directing these prosecutions, wants to give Biden something to say about Trump. They want to be able to call him a convicted felon. That's the only reason for this case.The legal team is not even arguing your nonsense. Stop making shit up. State prosecutors can and do charge felony crimes.
and
Why Does Trump Face Felony Charges? What is a felony 101 -- Mr. Trump faces 34 felony counts.
A felony is a crime of greater seriousness than a misdemeanor, and conviction of a felony carries the possible penalty of a year or more in prison.
Falsifying business records in New York State can be a misdemeanor, but prosecutors can bring the charge as a felony if they believe the records were falsified to conceal another crime.
Manhattan district attorney Alvin L. Bragg had suggested that Mr. Trump concealed three potential crimes, although he has not charged him with any of those.
Prosecutors do not need to prove such crimes were committed — only that there was “the intent to commit or conceal” an additional crime.
34 felony counts sounds impressive until you mention that they are all the same exact crime, which is called piling on offenses to make them seem worse than they really are. These are accounting errors. Worst you should be able to do is force him to pay a fine, but the Biden DOJ, which is directing these prosecutions, wants to give Biden something to say about Trump. They want to be able to call him a convicted felon. That's the only reason for this case.
The reason he's constantly being sued is because he's rich and he's running for POTUS.reality bites:
The Wall Street Journal got into the Catch & Kill Magadonian hopes and dreams long before Joe Biden and others entered into conspiratorial cabals seeking to derail Mr. Trump and crush the MAGA movement.
Then along came Common Cause, the watchdog group based in Washington D.C., with chapters in 35 states, that was founded in 1970 by John W. Gardner, a Republican. After the WSJ published it's hit peice on Trump, Common Cause filed complaints with the DOJ and the FEC.
Holding power accountable for illegal in-kind contributions $130,000 from Essential Consultants LLC to Stormy Daniels (Stephanie Clifford).
They were all in cahoots. The WSJ knew that groups like Common Cause were lying in wait. There were many, many others all seeking to take down The Boss of Trump Tower, leader of the Cult-of-Personality. But it is beginning to look like they've all failed. Although Mr. Trump lost (Bigly), a civil case brought by Ms. Carroll...
... we all know Mr. Trump is winning in all the criminal cases being brought against him.
![]()
WSJ & Common Cause Conspired Against Trump Long Before Biden Came Along
The Wall Street Journal got into the Catch & Kill Magadonian hopes and dreams long before Joe Biden and others entered into conspiratorial cabals seeking to derail Mr. Trump and crush the MAGA movement. Trump Lawyer Arranged $130,000 Payment for Adult-Film Star’s Silence Agreement just...www.usmessageboard.com
cuckooThe reason he's constantly being sued is because he's rich and he's running for POTUS.
Simple as that.
They think they can bankrupt him.
If you mean NY’s highest court, the answer is that it does have a power to remove judges from the bench. See, for example: NY judge who pulled gun on black defendant in court deemed ‘unfit,’ removed from officeThe judge probably knows this will all be overturned if there is a conviction. Are court of appeals and the SC able to remove judges that violate the Constitution?
Thanks for proving my point, even if it was by accident.cuckoo
![]()
COMPLAINTS: STORMY DANIELS HUSH MONEY
www.commoncause.org
View attachment 944705
Common Cause, the watchdog group based in Washington D.C., with chapters in 35 states, that was founded in 1970 by John W. Gardner, a Republican. After the WSJ published it's hit peice on Trump, Common Cause filed complaints with the DOJ and the FEC.
Common Cause is not the DOJ or Biden admin, or the Grand Juries and Prosecutors.Thanks for proving my point, even if it was by accident.![]()
![]()
As if it matters in today's political climate.Common Cause is not the DOJ or Biden admin, or the Grand Juries and Prosecutors.
"Me and my big mouth!" - TrumpAs if it matters in today's political climate.
It's become pretty damned clear that both sides have it in for Trump because he's pissing on their Corn Flakes.
The uni-party has a pretty good racket going and they don't like outsiders trying to stop them.
Seems like this is a blatant conspiracy resembling the Bulsheviks in their revolution throwing members of the opposing party in jail. The Democrats are doing just this. The question is, can the U.S. Supreme Court intervene and remove the judge and prosecutor?If you mean NY’s highest court, the answer is that it does have a power to remove judges from the bench. See, for example: NY judge who pulled gun on black defendant in court deemed ‘unfit,’ removed from office
But the standard is higher than merely a claim that the judge “violated” the Constitution.
~~~~~~cuckoo
![]()
COMPLAINTS: STORMY DANIELS HUSH MONEY
www.commoncause.org
View attachment 944705
Common Cause, the watchdog group based in Washington D.C., with chapters in 35 states, that was founded in 1970 by John W. Gardner, a Republican. After the WSJ published it's hit peice on Trump, Common Cause filed complaints with the DOJ and the FEC.
falseCommentary:
It appears that people like you would rather use "Lawfare" than allow the People to elect the next president.
When the tide turns will you and your fellow traveling conspirators accept "Lawfare" being used against you for your crimes, or will you cry and whine?
Not for a NY judge. No jurisdiction.Seems like this is a blatant conspiracy resembling the Bulsheviks in their revolution throwing members of the opposing party in jail. The Democrats are doing just this. The question is, can the U.S. Supreme Court intervene and remove the judge and prosecutor?