What IS a woman?

[White 6]

Hmmm... sounds like you'd be fine bedding a man dressed like a woman.

If he walks into the wrong damn bar, he'll care.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

That is a a question you might ask of the right. Why is a minuscule proportion of the population enraging rightwing leaders so much the must enact legislation singling them out and legislation banning them from getting medical care?

Because the rest of us do not want any part of the depravity, perversion, and madness that this tiny minority is so loudly trying to force on us.

And nobody is trying to deny anyone medical care. That's just a lie, and you know damn well that it's a lie.

But then lying is what you do. Lying is what you are.

You sick freaks nee to keep your perversions and your delusions to yourselves, and stop trying to force it on the rest of us.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Recently, a adult female supreme court nominee couldn't (or wouldn't) define "woman". Science has strict adherence to truth and proof. Scientifically, (the justice system depends on science and objective truth): what IS a "woman"?

The hateful, ignorant, bigoted right’s obsession with transgender Americans is pathological.

 

[skye]

For me.....

Here there is a man.....and by his side a woman....

in the middle a serpent.... a kind of trannie?

 

[Coyote]

Because the rest of us do not want an y part of the depravity, perversion, and madness that this tiny minority is so loudly trying to forced on us.

And nobody is trying to deny anyone medical care. That's just a lie, and you know damn well that it's a lie.

But then lying is what you do. Lying is what you are.

You sick freaks nee to keep your perversions and your delusions to yourselves, and stop trying to force it on the rest of us.

You’re still a man, right?

So what exactly is being forced on you?

 

[MisterBeale]

You are confusing the OP who asked “what is a woman” (which I answered) with another individual (with a long record) who can’t create a post without cramming in as many Nazi, Commie, Stalin references as possible.

No, I don't have any confusion at all. For one member, you have this standard. . . where, you need no definition. For another member, you seem to think, that having a subjective definition makes their arguments look weak. .. . .



What does that matter?

Maybe for him, "Nazi," is . . . . how did you put it? "Whatever she damn well wants to be."

Double standards are. .. double standards. You needn't have them in concurrence with just one member.

You are struggling to justify the partisan ideology of the political party whose positions party memberships, and leaders, you ostensibly support, when it is a gaslight operation.

.. . . now, I am not saying, the other side is any better, but we need to call out lunacy when it rears its head. And it clearly has in this regard. Without a standard legal definition of "woman," that is objective, and not subjective, there can be no meaningful enforcement of TITLE IX.

If you don't understand this? You don't give a damn about equal rights, or indeed, feminism. You are pissing on the very notion of equal treatment under the law.

We need objective legal standards, and the statement; "Whatever she damn well wants to be." Tells folks? Fuck objectivity. What we want is lawlessness and unequal application of arbitrary partisan rules to impose a police state.

Subvert the rule of law.[3]

That is the final step in closing down an open society. If you make legal definitions arbitrary? Yup, that would do it. We have had just about every other step take place, I have been waiting for that last one. . . and? Here it comes. . .

The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[toobfreak]

The hateful, ignorant, bigoted right’s obsession with transgender Americans is pathological.

Yep. The world is just FILLED with hateful, ignorant, bigoted mothers who DON'T want their young daughters going to the bathroom or locker room changing clothes having to do so in front of or see a big, fat hairy guy wearing a wig, bra, lipstick and tutu scratching his balls as he whips his big purple dick out to take a whizz.

 

[MaryL]

Misogyny, as a word just goes away, then we don't need the ERA or reproductive rights, because the idea of "female or woman" just becomes vague equivocal fog. Motherhood goes out the bloody window, because liberals can make up shit and get away with IT?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Yeah. Not being able to give birth alone cannot be a condition for deciding (or claiming) gender. Some women lose that ability (above and beyond menopause), other women never have it at all, which is why my three points.

We all understand what an automobile is, don't we?

And we all recognize, that due to a range of circumstances, from defects in manufacturing, to unrepaired wear and tear, to accidental damage, that there are instances of automobiles that do not function as an automobile should. But we can recognize that these defective/damaged instances are automobiles, without undermining the definition of what an automobile is, can't we?


We can recognize that a woman is defined and distinguished from a man, by the role that she plays in the human reproductive process. We can also recognize that due to not being at the fertile stage of her life, or due to disease, injury, or birth defect, that not all women are capable of fulfilling the female reproductive role, without undermining the definition of what a woman is and what distinguishes her from a man.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

If he truly identifies as a woman he is a transgender woman.

A “transgender woman” is not, and will never be, an actual woman. Just a mentally- and morally-defective man.

 

[MaryL]

We can't define something so bloody simple...then I had a flashback to Clinton:

 

[Coyote]

No, I don't have any confusion at all. For one member, you have this standard. . . where, you need no definition. For another member, you seem to think, that having a subjective definition makes their arguments look weak. .. . .



What does that matter?

Maybe for him, "Nazi," is . . . . how did you put it? "Whatever she damn well wants to be."

Double standards are. .. double standards. You needn't have them in concurrence with just one member.

You are struggling to justify the partisan ideology of the political party whose positions party memberships, and leaders, you ostensibly support, when it is a gaslight operation.

.. . . now, I am not saying, the other side is any better, but we need to call out lunacy when it rears its head. And it clearly has in this regard. Without a standard legal definition of "woman," that is objective, and not subjective, there can be no meaningful enforcement of TITLE IX.

If you don't understand this? You don't give a damn about equal rights, or indeed, feminism. You are pissing on the very notion of equal treatment under the law.

We need objective legal standards, and the statement; "Whatever she damn well wants to be." Tells folks? Fuck objectivity. What we want is lawlessness and unequal application of arbitrary partisan rules to impose a police state.

Subvert the rule of law.[3]

That is the final step in closing down an open society. If you make legal definitions arbitrary? Yup, that would do it. We have had just about every other step take place, I have been waiting for that last one. . . and? Here it comes. . .

The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

What is a woman?


What ever she damn well wants to be.

She is a mother, a daughter, a sister, a wife…but first and foremost, a person.

She is a teacher, a nurse, a construction worker, a farmer, a musician, a homeless person, a grocery store clerk, an artist, an engineer…whatever she damn well wants to be.

Who are you or anyone else to tell her what she is supposed to be as if she can’t speak for herself? A woman is MORE than her biology. And that is what you seem to miss.

 

[toobfreak]

We all understand what an automobile is, don't we? And we all recognize, that due to a range of circumstances, from defects in manufacturing, to unrepaired wear and tear, to accidental damage, that there are instances of automobiles that do not function as an automobile should. But we can recognize that these defective/damaged instances are automobiles, without undermining the definition of what an automobile is, can't we? We can recognize that a woman is defined and distinguished from a man, by the role that she plays in the human reproductive process. We can also recognize that due to not being at the fertile stage of her life, or due to disease, injury, or birth defect, that not all women are capable of fulfilling the female reproductive role, without undermining the definition of what a woman is and what distinguishes her from a man.

Gee, Bob, you give better, much more erudite answers than Katanji does! Have you ever considered running for the Supreme Court?!

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The hateful, ignorant, bigoted right’s obsession with transgender Americans is pathological.

What is pathological is the left's wrong's obsession with trying to force this depravity, perversion, and madness on sane people who want no part of it.

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

 

[skye]

View attachment 621729

Pretty little flower!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Gee, Bob, you give better, much more erudite answers than Katanji does! Have you ever considered running for the Supreme Court?!

I would not normally ever consider myself anywhere close to qualified or suitable for that position, but given where the bar has just been set with Kentanji Brown Jackson, it's not so difficult to see me as much more qualified that her. At least I am not the least bit confused about what a woman is, or what distinguishes her from a man.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

You Putin lovers constantly redefine “Nazi”…in this case, you are just channeling moron.

A woman can be anything she wants to be and vermin like you don’t get to decide.

But you have one redeeming quality, you love dogs.

A woman can be anything she wants to be and vermin like you don’t get to decide.

Bwaaahhaaaaa.....too fucking funny, any one remember Sandra Bullock who played an FBI agent in "Miss Congeniality"? The script had her as a bad ass cop, who beat up her partner on stage, but when a real man came up to her house she was whimpering like a progressive pussy, while calling the cops. You women sure do act tough, when you think you can get away with it, but when it physically comes to real women, with real men, there is no competition.

 

[MaryL]

I know what a woman IS. My Mother, My sister, my best friend. They gave, they are life. I hate to get all emotional...must be the estrogen talking.

 

[MisterBeale]

What is a woman?


What ever she damn well wants to be.

She is a mother, a daughter, a sister, a wife…but first and foremost, a person.

She is a teacher, a nurse, a construction worker, a farmer, a musician, a homeless person, a grocery store clerk, an artist, an engineer…whatever she damn well wants to be.

Who are you or anyone else to tell her what she is supposed to be as if she can’t speak for herself? A woman is MORE than her biology. And that is what you seem to miss.

You're being cute.

That, for legal purposes, is NOT what is meant, when the question is asked, what is a woman? Does being a woman have anything to do with what sex they are?

Objective standards. . . Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson even intimated, by stating, she is NOT a biologist. Therefor, it must have something to do with biology.

For instance;

No person in the United States shall, based on sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
— Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute (20 U.S. Code § 1681 – Sex)

If, for instance, Lia Thomas, can claim, he, is a she, can other institutions which have men, who claim to be women, and then fulfill their responsibilities under title IX?

Can anyone that claims to be a "woman?" And will this lead to discrimination and revocation of federal funding under title IX?