because he isn't one.
Well of course not, because he is a Democrat. Even though he took us to war in Bosnia. Funny how that works. If a Repub uses troops in combat, he is a "hawk" but if a Dem does, like Obama did in Libya, they aren't hawks.
How many of our sons and daughters did we lose in Bosnia and Libya? How much did each of those 'wars' cost?
You assholes are pathetic in trying to deflect the just critisism of your chickenhawk leaders. Ike would have held both Bush and Cheney in utter contempt as shirkers and idiots.
So the number of casualties determines whether or not the President is a "chickenhawk"?
12 deaths in Bosnia.
And by the way, I don't agree with the way the Bush wars were fought. I don't think we should be using ground troops in that manner. Nuclear weapons and carpet bombings would had gotten the job done and far less casualties on our side.
But you know it is hypocrtical to call certain Repubs "chickenhawks", but ignore the fact that none of the Dems in recent years ever served. Both Bushes served in the military no matter how much you batshit crazy libs want to downplay it.