What I consider Trump's WORST statement (almost treasonous)

[Cellblock2429]

Grabbin' pussy was the winner for me.
Trump was JOKING, sarcastically.
For heavens sake.

/---- And yet not one Hollywood superstar has stepped forward to say that never happens to them. Not one. Interesting.

Your argument that "everyone else is doing it, Mom!" is pretty lame.

/---- Let me dumb it down for you. Hollywood Libs hate Trump. If Trump said something that they personally could testify was not true then they would have jumped on the opportunity 5 seconds after the tape was released. Of course they didn't because they know it's true.

 

[Flash]

So you are a stupid treasonous Libtard asshole that didn't want the truth about that Crooked Hillary bitch's corruption to be exposed?

Moron.......if you're searching for the "truth" about Hillary.....DO IT DOMESTICALLY and not ask for a foreign, adversarial power to do it for you.....Find a grown up to explain this to you.....LOL

The truth is that Crooked Hillary is a piece of shit that is corrupt and dishonest not to mention being a crook with her leakage of classified information. The Liberal media would not hold the bitch accountable for her corruption and the Obama Administration sure as hell did not hold her accountable, did they?

It was a good thing that information about her corruption and the corruption of the DNC was exposed by Wikileaks, which by the way is thought to have come from a DNC insider and not the Russians. .

You stupid Moon Bat Libtards hate the truth, don't you? The truth is never your friend.

Why in the hell did that asshole decide to run her government work from her own server and not the government's? Why did the corrupt bitch delete all her records? The answer is damn simple. It was because she didn't want to have a record of her selling government influence and rigging the Primaries.

Thank god that filthy ass bitch was not elected President. You were an idiot to vote for her. You must have you head all the way up your ass to d something as stupid as to vote for her to be President. What the hell were you thinking Moon Bat? Are you ever going to pull your head out of your ass?

 

[Flash]

It is hilarious that these stupid Moon Bats are claiming that Trump is somehow a traitor by saying that it is a good thing that the truth about Crooked Hillary's corruption be exposed but at the same time they ignore the fact that Obama sold out this country to the Muslims, Iran, Illegals, welfare queens and even the Communists in Cuba and North Korea. That is a real traitor for you.

 

[westwall]

Here's an example of why Trump is WRONG......

If the orange clown "thinks" that too many illegals voted, should he REQUEST that our voting be monitored by Russian observers??????

LOL

I REALLY would like a response from right wingers IF they'd think it was perfectly OK for Trump to ask Putin to "monitor" our voting so that illegals would not vote against his fat ass.................LOL

Here's the deal natty. IT WAS A JOKE! And, further to your claim that it is "treasonous" for him to ask that, according to the shrilary she had no State emails, nor did she have Classified content on the server. We KNOW those claims to be false, but that's beside the point. The point is her server was PRIVATE! Which means it can't be treason you stupid ass.

 

[CMike]

Of course, Trump ass-kissers will shrug this off....or worse, think that Trump is just the cutest pumpkin when he opens his tiny mouth......but for others with a few more brain cells.

Here's what I consider to be the WORST of the orange clown's moments, when asking a FOREIGN and ADVERSARIAL power to "help" his sorry ass in the election.

“Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said in reference to the emails deleted by Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.
“I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Are you talking about the 30,000 emails that were deleted AFTER Congress told that stupid bitch to turn them over?

that's a Republican lie.... you are regurgitating....like a good little Trumpster...

The 30k of emails she had her staff delete were personal emails, of which government rules dictate her TO NOT TURN THEM IN... Do NOT send any personal emails or records to the government archives unless they are government documents or government related.

Congress did not ask or subpoena her for ALL of her emails or even her server, they subpoenaed her for government records/ regarding Benghazi....no judge in America would approve Congress for a subpoena for her own personal emails....

 

[CMike]

According to right wingers......Openly asking a foreign and adversarial power to help Trump win, will ....from now on ......be regarded as "sarcasm"; of course, only if you're an orange demagogue.

It was obviously sarcasm.

Be less sad and pathetic.

Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.

SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.

It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.

Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?

Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.

 

[CMike]

Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?

......but, but, Rush and Sean said there was one...........LOL

Let me get this straight. You are challenging whether the emails were subpoenaed?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Follow
Hillary Clinton ✔ @HillaryClinton
It should concern every American that Russia is willing to engage in such hostile acts in order to help Donald Trump become president.


9:24 PM - 7 Oct 2016

• 
  
• 10,659 10,659 Retweets
• 22,462

 

[2aguy]

So you are a stupid treasonous Libtard asshole that didn't want the truth about that Crooked Hillary bitch's corruption to be exposed?

Moron.......if you're searching for the "truth" about Hillary.....DO IT DOMESTICALLY and not ask for a foreign, adversarial power to do it for you.....Find a grown up to explain this to you.....LOL

I am curious....when was your sense of humor removed....? Was it when they removed your brain, or after?

 

[Wry Catcher]

According to right wingers......Openly asking a foreign and adversarial power to help Trump win, will ....from now on ......be regarded as "sarcasm"; of course, only if you're an orange demagogue.

It was obviously sarcasm.

Be less sad and pathetic.

Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.

SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.

It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.

Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?

Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.

Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.

My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.

Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.

 

[2aguy]

It was obviously sarcasm.

Be less sad and pathetic.

Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.

SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.

It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.

Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?

Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.

Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.

My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.

Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.

She doesn't have character to assassinate.......comey doesn't either..........

 

[nat4900]

You're not getting replies because nobody knows WTF you're talking about.

In other words, you're even DUMBER than usual???......LOL

 

[nat4900]

We KNOW those claims to be false,

You do, do you??...........while , at the same time,you fuckheads DEMAND proof of the orange lard's possible collusion???......LOL

 

[nat4900]

Let me get this straight. You are challenging whether the emails were subpoenaed?

FBI: No evidence Clinton ordered deletion of subpoenaed email archive

 

[nat4900]

I am curious....when was your sense of humor removed....? Was it when they removed your brain, or after?

Absolutely a "brilliant" retort.........So, if Hillary asked Putin to "please verify if trump likes to be peed on"....you morons would just be rolling on the floor with laughter?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.

SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.

It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.

Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?

Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.

Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.

My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.

Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.

She doesn't have character to assassinate.......comey doesn't either..........

Yeah, sure. Don't you have a gun to polish?

 

[francoHFW]

Of course, Trump ass-kissers will shrug this off....or worse, think that Trump is just the cutest pumpkin when he opens his tiny mouth......but for others with a few more brain cells.

Here's what I consider to be the WORST of the orange clown's moments, when asking a FOREIGN and ADVERSARIAL power to "help" his sorry ass in the election.

“Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said in reference to the emails deleted by Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.
“I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Are you talking about the 30,000 emails that were deleted AFTER Congress told that stupid bitch to turn them over?

no lol. Here we go again...
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...rchive&usg=AFQjCNFh2SYOV6tXb0VDg6ucuyPc9DzoDQ

 

[nat4900]

It was obviously sarcasm.

Be less sad and pathetic.

Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.

SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.

It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.

Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?

Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.

Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.

My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.

Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.

FBI: No evidence Clinton ordered deletion of subpoenaed email archive

 

[francoHFW]

Look I don't agree with the OP but here's some math to think about: there are 320 million people in the US. there are 150 million in Russia. Do you think when President Trump speaks publicly in a way that you recognize as sarcastic some small percentage of these people will take it seriously? Call it .02% of the people who take this or some other "sarcastic statement" literally (like all media is evil or I want to punch that guy in the face). In the US alone that's 64,000 people taking him seriously. I have friends in the Secret Service who think none of this is amusing including the culture being created in the US by mindless hyperbole on internet sites.

SOme small percentage of people are going to be bat shit crazy. We cant' live our lives tip toeing around them.

It was obviously sarcasm aimed at HIllary for "losing" the emails, and the media for not making a bigger deal of that fact that hillary defied a subpoena.

Please post the Subpoena, and what was listed within it?

Since you are interested in the details of the actual subpoena then I suggest you research it and find what is listed in it.

Nice non answer, I have written subpoenas and in terms of a subpoena the material evidence needs to be exact and the reason explicit. I've made no claim as to the subpoena ordered by the court, and asked the person who claimed she defied the court order what specifically she deleted.

My question was germane to the issue; I do not take any allegation of wrong doing of anyone, by someone on this message board, seriously. I withhold my judgment until an investigation has been completed. In the case of HRC, she was absolved by Comey of criminal wrong doing.

Of course that does not satisfy those who hoped differently, so they continue their quest to assassinate the character of Sect. Clinton, former FBI director Comey and the FBI.

FBI: No evidence Clinton ordered deletion of subpoenaed email archive

Another great example of dupes being brainwashed by RW BS. Including many Indies and Dems. The pile of Pubcrappe is like Everest...

 

[Avatar4321]

According to right wingers......Openly asking a foreign and adversarial power to help Trump win, will ....from now on ......be regarded as "sarcasm"; of course, only if you're an orange demagogue.

It was obviously sarcasm.

Be less sad and pathetic.

I don't think he can be