Funny.....
Isn't that what Nazi Germany believed would cure the worlds problems also?
*****SARCASTIC CHUCKLE*****
Last edited:
What has happened to us?
- Thread starter Coyote
- Start date
- Status
Funny.....
Isn't that what Nazi Germany believed would cure the worlds problems also?
*****SARCASTIC CHUCKLE*****
SobieskiSavedEurope
Gold Member
- Banned
- #602
Funny.....
Isn't that what Nazi Germany believed would cure the worlds problems also?
*****SARCASTIC SMILE*****
It's not NAZIS which are the Problem it's Anglo-Saxons, AKA English & German every system you guys try ends up with bodies strewn all over the place.
Robert Bowers is the UGLY face of Anglo-Saxons.
Meanwhile Poland had a system similar to Nazis in the 1930's under Jozef Beck, an Authoritarian, anti-Jewish one, and didn't kill much of anyone, HOW COME???????????
I made a thread on this, below.
Non-Violent Authoritarian/Anti-Semite regime.
SobieskiSavedEurope
Gold Member
- Banned
- #603
View attachment 225437
So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.
*****SMILE*****
Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?
So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.
The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.
Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.
So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?
How statistically honest of you...
*****CHUCKLE*****
MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.
I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.
You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.
Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.
The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.
Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.
Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.
I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.
You are aware that Danes and Swedes were Vikings? Your theory has so many holes....
Anglo-Saxons & Vikings = Germanic's.
Besides, how many did the Viking's kill, exactly?
I'd love to see a figure that puts it into the sphere of Anglo-Saxons.
View attachment 225437
So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.
*****SMILE*****
Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?
So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.
The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.
Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.
So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?
How statistically honest of you...
*****CHUCKLE*****
MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.
I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.
You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.
Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.
The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.
Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.
Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.
I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.
I'm sure if we go far enough back in history we'd find some atrocities committed by your favored Polish group.
*****SMILE*****
I'll fess up to Polish mass-murders, basically the ones that Germans & Jews always shriek about. (As if they're less violent than Poles, which is a LAUGH-RIOT)
Bromberg Massacre: Approx 300, or so Germans were massacred by Poles because local Germans collaborated with Nazis to oppress Poland.
Jedwabne Massacre: Approx 300, or so Jews were massacred by Poles because local Jews collaborated with Soviets to oppress Poland.
Now, look at Anglo - Saxons.
They caused WW1, & WW2, that's like 60 - 100 million dead, and includes the Holocaust.
They caused the British Empire atrocities in India, where 30 - 60 million starved to death by Famine, a figure which rivals the amount starved to death by Mao the Communist, except this was by a crude Capitalist like British Empire.
They caused 13 - 30 million dead by the U.S.A since WW2.
Here we are, where Anglo-Saxons like Bowers, Paddock, Fields, and Roof are striking over, and over again.
The blood is on the Anglo-Saxon hands.
Now tell me when is the CARNAGE going to end??????????
Anglo-Saxons tried Capitalism, Fascism, and Communism and each system has lead to the BODIES strewn all over the place.
So you want to turn this into a white hate thread... More specifically you wish to aim the hate towards Anglo-Saxons and think that all other races and ethnic groups are faultless.
I hope that works out well for you.
*****SMILE*****
Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
View attachment 225437
So the more documented serial killers and nut cases are in the cities and countries that keep somewhat reliable records about crime, mass murders, and such... Imagine that.
*****SMILE*****
Should we talk about the Japanese atrocities of WWII? How about Stalin and Lenin's reigns in Russia? NO??? Want to talk about Pol Pot or Mao?..... How about we just sweep those under the rug for you?
So, basically we have two spheres of "Mass murders" the Asian influenced ones, and the Anglo-Saxon ones.
The Asian race (Mongoloids) does have close to 3 billions of members, while the Anglo-Saxon have more like 300 million members.
Basically despite Mongoloid's outnumbering Anglo-Saxons nearly by 10, they still couldn't out kill you f*cking MANIAC Anglo-Saxon.
So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?
How statistically honest of you...
*****CHUCKLE*****
MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.
I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.
You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.
Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.
The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.
Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.
Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.
I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.
You are aware that Danes and Swedes were Vikings? Your theory has so many holes....
Anglo-Saxons & Vikings = Germanic's.
Besides, how many did the Viking's kill, exactly?
I'd love to see a figure that puts it into the sphere of Anglo-Saxons.
Ok well you just said this:
"I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace."
And so now you are lumping Swedes and Danes in too? You have so many holes in your crazy theory.
SobieskiSavedEurope
Gold Member
- Banned
- #606
So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?
How statistically honest of you...
*****CHUCKLE*****
MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.
I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.
You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.
Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.
The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.
Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.
Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.
I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.
You are aware that Danes and Swedes were Vikings? Your theory has so many holes....
Anglo-Saxons & Vikings = Germanic's.
Besides, how many did the Viking's kill, exactly?
I'd love to see a figure that puts it into the sphere of Anglo-Saxons.
Ok well you just said this:
"I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace."
And so now you are lumping Swedes and Danes in too? You have so many holes in your crazy theory.
Anglo-Saxons have killed 100's of millions, and how about Vikings???????
Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
- 1,130
So you're going to include all Asians in your figures but single out the Anglo-Saxons instead of all the Caucasians?
How statistically honest of you...
*****CHUCKLE*****
MOST of Europe's problems & also MOST of America's problems have been FOR Generations been Anglo-Saxons.
I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace.
You singled out Russia, but Russia is partially Asiatic.
Russia still hasn't killed as much as Anglo-Saxon tribes.
The Bolsheviks including Lenin were sent by SAXONS (Germans) into Russia in 1917.
Lenin was Jewish, German, Kalmyk (Mongol) and some others.
Stalin was Georgian & his NKVD was more Jewish than Russian in the early - mid 1930's.
I'm not so sure I'd call Russia's problems, the same thing, either.
You are aware that Danes and Swedes were Vikings? Your theory has so many holes....
Anglo-Saxons & Vikings = Germanic's.
Besides, how many did the Viking's kill, exactly?
I'd love to see a figure that puts it into the sphere of Anglo-Saxons.
Ok well you just said this:
"I don't see why people like Polish, Czechs, Hungarians, Estonians, Swiss, Irish Catholics, Danes, Swedes, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, and whole bunch others who didn't do a heck of a lot of mass-murders, should be lumped in with the Anglo-Saxon menace."
And so now you are lumping Swedes and Danes in too? You have so many holes in your crazy theory.
Anglo-Saxons have killed 100's of millions, and how about Vikings???????
Vikings were a small population over a thousand years ago killing with swords and spears. They were very violent for the time. But again you said Danes and Swedes shouldn't be lumped in, but for 300 years they were some of the planets most violent people. Now they are quite peaceful. Your theory is full of holes.
No! No! I think it's current conversational drift is answering the Coyote 's initial question.
*****SMILE*****
Last edited:
Forgive me if I dont just believe your literal accusation. I have a hard time seeing you make an economic argument about the tax cuts and being called a racist or nazi in rebuttal. So here you are dishonestly exaggerating...being part of the problem.
Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 34,572
- 27,554
- 2,915
No! No! I think it's current conversational drift is answering the OP's initial question.
*****SMILE*****
Drive a stake through THAT video too!
EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 87,821
- 63,199
- 3,645
The Democrat message of "we hate you" certainly predated Trump. Democrats have been saying it for years. The redneck southerners, the hillbillies, the small town fools from forgotten flyover country were the butt of increasingly vicious hostility. Shitstain obama voiced disdain of those who cling to guns and bibles.
In 2016 the democrat slogan was "we hate you". Our answer was Donald Trump. He incurred pointed Democrat ire by just loving everyone democrats made a point of hating. How he was ridiculed and mocked when he openly said I love poor people, Uneducated people. All the people hated by democrsts.
It's passed that. The democrat slogan is we really hate you and want you dead.
We believe you. We really do believe you.
No! No! I think it's current conversational drift is answering the OP's initial question.
*****SMILE*****
Drive a stake through THAT video too!
Maybe I should ask to be a mod....... Nah!!!...
*****CHUCKLE*****
On the lighter side and something we all need a little more of...
*****HAPPY SMILE*****
candycorn
Diamond Member
Nothing. Just a bad week.
Now in a larger sense…there has been a shift away from the counsel of people who can reason to people who rely on fear and anger. Since the topic of the day is violence, the focus should be there. Clearly, the rest of the world has the problem figured out; don’t allow tools of violence in your society and you have a lot less violence. Anyone looking at this can reason but if you attempt to show someone this simple formula….the fear is put into the equation; quickly followed by anger and what I will call dis-information. Mis-information is simply being stupid. Dis-information is changing the facts to suit your outlook.
No. But yes if you live in a mostly Muslim country. Apostasy is punishable by death in those lovely places.
RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
I don't know. Ask them.
Mikeoxenormous
Diamond Member
Progressives are burning cities, punching women, and the elderly.
I've certainly been called racist in such discussions, and if not racist, which is the lib go to, then some other "name of some sort".
I am NOT exaggerating.
Every single FUCKING TIME.
Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,852
- 2,190
- Banned
- #620
How about not raising taxes, killing babies, giving taxpayer money away, and trying to ban guns?
- Status
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Poor Poll Numbers Don't Yet Reflect the Full Picture- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 1
-
Trump Throws Base Under the Bus with Real ID China-Style, National Face Recognition Database- Started by munkle
- Replies: 8
-
-
