What Happened to The Republican Party?

I’ve never defended them. Not once asshole.

Why do you support genocide?
you are the one that supports Genocide since the Government of Pals actively says they intend to murder all Jews in Isreal and prove it every time they attack indiscriminately civilians in Isreal Oct 7 proved it and they announced to the cheers of pals in Gaza that they intended to do Oct 7 over and over again.
 
you are the one that supports Genocide since the Government of Pals actively says they intend to murder all Jews in Isreal and prove it every time they attack indiscriminately civilians in Isreal Oct 7 proved it and they announced to the cheers of pals in Gaza that they intended to do Oct 7 over and over again.
As always, you’re terribly uninformed.

You clearly know nothing about the history of Palestine and Israel. You’re a typical dumb American.

Israel has indiscriminately murdered far more civilians than Hamas, but you don’t know this obvious fact.
 
As always, you’re terribly uninformed.

You clearly know nothing about the history of Palestine and Israel. You’re a typical dumb American.

Israel has indiscriminately murdered far more civilians than Hamas, but you don’t know this obvious fact.
Isreal has ONLY ever fired in response to attacks by the terrorists
 
The gleeful reactions to Kirk's death just made it obvious that coexistence with certain people isn't possible. It also begs the question of what the relevance of free speech is when elements of the left apparently view words as violence and thus support violence enacted on people for said words.

John Adams once said, "“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." I don't think we have that kind of populace, or at least, a large portion of the public lacks those qualities.

So, is the Constitution and its values relevant among people who don't support those values? I'm not sure if it is anymore.

Countries like Singapore seem to have a better balance of what is allowed and what isn't regarding speech and propagandizing. It also helps that they've had the same party in power for decades, which provides far more stability than what you typically see with Western nations.

The whole concept of the marketplace of ideas is flawed, because the best ideas don't rise to the top in terms of logical worth. The best marketed ideas rise, which usually involves a healthy dose of emotional manipulation, since most people are more emotional than logical. Midwits, in particular, are the easiest to manipulate in this way via institutions like academia and media. Women also tend to be more prone to this emotional manipulation via weaponized empathy.
 
Just so everybody is aware of what I'm talking about I already had two people disown me on here. Not like it's any skin off my back, but there is nothing, absolutely NOTHING that I've been talking about lately that is wrong.


Except for one thing that I came right out and admitted to that people mocking Kirk's death might simply just be misguided and not evil by choice in wanting us dead, evil by being brainwashed by the mainstream media and edited clips of Kirk on YouTube.
I’ve disagreed with a couple of things you’ve recently claimed. I hope that doesn’t lead you to believe that I have “disowned” you.

Just to be clear, in my experience here at USMB, conservatives usually accept differing points of view on a variety of matters. At the very least, we can usually discuss those different viewpoints more fairly, squarely and politely with each other than any leftist can disagree with other leftists.
 
Last edited:
The gleeful reactions to Kirk's death just made it obvious that coexistence with certain people isn't possible. It also begs the question of what the relevance of free speech is when elements of the left apparently view words as violence and thus support violence enacted on people for said words.

John Adams once said, "“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." I don't think we have that kind of populace, or at least, a large portion of the public lacks those qualities.

So, is the Constitution and its values relevant among people who don't support those values? I'm not sure if it is anymore.
If it ever was to them.

In any event, I’m always curious what they see as a better system.

Naturally, their tendency to embrace “socialism” or “Marxism” (under whatever various labels they may use) is absurd and a non-starter.
Countries like Singapore seem to have a better balance of what is allowed and what isn't regarding speech and propagandizing. It also helps that they've had the same party in power for decades, which provides far more stability than what you typically see with Western nations.

The whole concept of the marketplace of ideas is flawed, because the best ideas don't rise to the top in terms of logical worth. The best marketed ideas rise, which usually involves a healthy dose of emotional manipulation, since most people are more emotional than logical. Midwits, in particular, are the easiest to manipulate in this way via institutions like academia and media. Women also tend to be more prone to this emotional manipulation via weaponized empathy.
 
Isreal has ONLY ever fired in response to attacks by the terrorists
Wow are you dupe. You believe whatever the establishment tells you. I thought you were smarter than that.

The onus is on the party committing genocide to stop committing genocide. The onus is not on the victims of the genocide to sign agreements in the hope of saving themselves from the genocide. This is obvious to anyone who isn't a psychopath.-Caitlin Johnstone
 
Wow are you dupe. You believe whatever the establishment tells you. I thought you were smarter than that.

The onus is on the party committing genocide to stop committing genocide. The onus is not on the victims of the genocide to sign agreements in the hope of saving themselves from the genocide. This is obvious to anyone who isn't a psychopath.-Caitlin Johnstone
there really is no point talking to you, your delusions win out every time.
 
15th post
You may want to leave emotions out of your political decision making. That is the path to the dark side. The left has been brainwashed to all think alike, the right has not. You are going to find that there is a lot more political freedom of thought on the right and those thoughts may not align with your thoughts. Individual voices are welcomed and a genuine discussion can be had. Welcome to how America should be run.
 
I’ve disagreed with a couple of things you’ve recently claimed. I hope that doesn’t lead you to believe that I have “disowned” you.

I know. I didn't say you.
 
Tell me how 680,000 Palestinians have been murdered by your true nation of Israel? Did Hamas kill them?

Traitor!
Gaza genocide death toll revised up - now over 680,000, including almost half a million children
Not possible as palestinians do not exist, the arabs claiming to be palestinians keep lobbing shells into Israel, a place they have no claim to, as palestinians do not exist, they are arabs. Then they hide behind women children, and the walls of hospitals and schools hide their weapons
Way back on March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview with Palestine Liberation Organization executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.
 
Not possible as palestinians do not exist, the arabs claiming to be palestinians keep lobbing shells into Israel, a place they have no claim to, as palestinians do not exist, they are arabs. Then they hide behind women children, and the walls of hospitals and schools hide their weapons
Way back on March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview with Palestine Liberation Organization executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:
You too clearly know nothing about the history of Palestine. You’ve been duped by the Zionist ruling elite, as most Americans have.

I find debating on message boards only works when one is informed on the topic in discussion.
 
Back
Top Bottom