What ever happened to that ridiculous climate change hoax.

Mostly because it is easier to simply accept what anybody tells you without bothering to check the facts for yourself.

Plus the insane number of attacks one falls under if they dare to even appear to contradict the religious fanatics.
The earth now
is too big for factual science.
It will take hundreds if not thousands of years.

Otherwise were just massaging our fantasies of star trek egos, which is fine,
but it's not yet practical.
 
Mostly because it is easier to simply accept what anybody tells you without bothering to check the facts for yourself.

Plus the insane number of attacks one falls under if they dare to even appear to contradict the religious fanatics.
& u just nailed
science
religion & philosophy
in one post.
On my thread.
That's pretty good...
 
& u just nailed
science
religion & philosophy
in one post.
On my thread.
That's pretty good...

The thing is, I see the climate zealots are exactly the same as religious zealots.

Complete with refusing to even listen to anything that does not agree with their beliefs, denying anything that contradicts their beliefs, demanding others follow their orthodoxy, labeling those who do not agree as "heretics", and even demanding punishments upon those who do not agree. And yes, punishments.

Who should be prosecuted for postericide? We could start by examining the established international network of well-funded organizations devoted to organized climate denial. The epicentre of this activity is in the United States. A set of Conservative think-tanks has deliberately deceived the public and policymakers about the realities of climate change.

And that is even more disturbing when one realizes the above article was posted on the official United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) website.

Largely out of public view, there is a growing advocacy for treating certain forms of climate change denial as a crime. The political will to do this doesn’t exist today, of course, but give it a decade or two.

I see absolutely nothing different between their behavior and how the Catholics responded during the Reformation or after the Reconquista. All who refuse to believe the orthodoxy must be destroyed, only our One True Belief is to be tolerated.

So whenever it is a discussion about "Climate Change" and I bring up religion, the mindless fanatics that refuse to look into the geological record are who I am actually talking about. I find them as mindless as "Young Earth Creationists" to be honest.

But on the other hand, I have never heard YEC advocating that those do not agree with them be attacked or imprisoned either.
 
it is easier to simply accept what anybody tells you without bothering to check the facts for yourself.



IT is also very easy to

1. refuse to answer questions
2. refuse to notice the BS you just posted is completely refuted by ice cores, and continue to post it
3. attack those outing what you posted as 100% false


And THAT is what you do.
 
The thing is, I see the climate zealots are exactly the same as religious zealots.

Complete with refusing to even listen to anything that does not agree with their beliefs, denying anything that contradicts their beliefs, demanding others follow their orthodoxy, labeling those who do not agree as "heretics", and even demanding punishments upon those who do not agree. And yes, punishments.



And that is even more disturbing when one realizes the above article was posted on the official United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) website.



I see absolutely nothing different between their behavior and how the Catholics responded during the Reformation or after the Reconquista. All who refuse to believe the orthodoxy must be destroyed, only our One True Belief is to be tolerated.

So whenever it is a discussion about "Climate Change" and I bring up religion, the mindless fanatics that refuse to look into the geological record are who I am actually talking about. I find them as mindless as "Young Earth Creationists" to be honest.

But on the other hand, I have never heard YEC advocating that those do not agree with them be attacked or imprisoned either.

I agree ...

 
The thing is, I see the climate zealots are exactly the same as religious zealots.

Complete with refusing to even listen to anything that does not agree with their beliefs, denying anything that contradicts their beliefs, demanding others follow their orthodoxy, labeling those who do not agree as "heretics", and even demanding punishments upon those who do not agree. And yes, punishments.



And that is even more disturbing when one realizes the above article was posted on the official United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) website.



I see absolutely nothing different between their behavior and how the Catholics responded during the Reformation or after the Reconquista. All who refuse to believe the orthodoxy must be destroyed, only our One True Belief is to be tolerated.

So whenever it is a discussion about "Climate Change" and I bring up religion, the mindless fanatics that refuse to look into the geological record are who I am actually talking about. I find them as mindless as "Young Earth Creationists" to be honest.

But on the other hand, I have never heard YEC advocating that those do not agree with them be attacked or imprisoned either.
How political is climate change ?
If it is
What makes it so ?
 
How political is climate change ?
If it is
What makes it so ?

It is completely political ... as the science doesn't confirm the assumptions ... especially the assumption that carbon dioxide has magical powers over radiation ... it only has regular powers over radiation ...

... and there's not enough carbon dioxide to make any difference in temperature ...
 
It is completely political ... as the science doesn't confirm the assumptions ... especially the assumption that carbon dioxide has magical powers over radiation ... it only has regular powers over radiation ...

... and there's not enough carbon dioxide to make any difference in temperature ...
With that, i think we'll all breath easier.
 
No ... it's idiocy ... Surface Air Pressure is defined as the weight of the air column above the surface ... for Earth, this is 14.7 pounds per square inch ... or 101,300 newtons per square meter ...

Temperature has no effect on these values ... none what-so-ever ...
So temperature
has what effect on temperature value of what ?
My next thread in potitical envirionment is:
Is the energy stored in middle earth "renewable" ?
If not why ?
 
So temperature
has what effect on temperature value of what ?
My next thread in potitical envirionment is:
Is the energy stored in middle earth "renewable" ?
If not why ?

Temperature is the measure of kinetic energy ... pressure is the measure of gravitational force ...

Energy stored in Middle Earth would only be available to the Elves and their magic ... not the magic of Men ... I don't know about Dwarves ... but yeah, what a political environment, ever notice how all Gandalf's political enemies die horrible and painful deaths? ...
 
pressure is the measure of gravitational force


all forms of air pressure are correlated with temperature, including atmospheres...


Atmospheric Pressure - Geography






Notice the T in the equation....
 
all forms of air pressure are correlated with temperature, including atmospheres...


Atmospheric Pressure - Geography






Notice the T in the equation....

Notice the k? ...

Where'd you dig up this ratio? ... c'mon stupid ... the definition of pressure is:

Pressure = Force / Area ... as in "newtons per square meter" or "pounds per square inch" ...

Hey *****, do you even know what the e is in your formula ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... what a maroon ...
 
15th post
Notice the k? ...

Where'd you dig up this ratio? ... c'mon stupid ... the definition of pressure is:

Pressure = Force / Area ... as in "newtons per square meter" or "pounds per square inch" ...

Hey *****, do you even know what the e is in your formula ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... what a maroon ...



"pounds per square inch" increases when the speed of the gas molecules accelerates. Heat does that.

HAW HAW HAW HAW

what form of air pressure is not correlated with temperature?

HAW HAW HAW HAW

That is the formula for AIR PRESSURE at any altitude. It is correlated with T, TEMPERATURE... The greater the T, the lower the negative exponent, the higher the pressure.

Did you ever pass 6th grade math??

HAW HAW HAW
 
"pounds per square inch" increases when the speed of the gas molecules accelerates. Heat does that.

HAW HAW HAW HAW

what form of air pressure is not correlated with temperature?

HAW HAW HAW HAW

That is the formula for AIR PRESSURE at any altitude. It is correlated with T, TEMPERATURE... The greater the T, the lower the negative exponent, the higher the pressure.

Did you ever pass 6th grade math??

HAW HAW HAW

So does volume ... stupid ... and mass ... moron ...

Your formula is the gas law ... idiot ... notice the k? ... here's a free clue: Barometric formula - Wikipedia ... complete with derivation ... and integration is college math ... real scientists use differentials ... lame bloody pussyclots don't ...

Pressure is DEFINED as force over area ... you're not allowed to change that ...

[Handwave] ... go monger whores or something ... like your hero the Twump ... anti-learning in the extreme ...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom