What do tattoos on women really say?

They sure look like Kamala voters
:auiqs.jpg:
Yeah, I was just being honest

If she had shown a pic of urban looking hipsters with tats, I would’ve said they’re democrat voters

The couple in her pic are straight up trailer park Trump voters
 
Yeah, I was just being honest

If she had shown a pic of urban looking hipsters with tats, I would’ve said they’re democrat voters

The couple in her pic are straight up trailer park Trump voters
Regardless, doesn’t change the sentiment: women who tatoo their bodies, be they Trump or Kamala voters, are announcing to the world that they’re low-class sluts.

IMO, of course.
 
Ever see that tat just below the bikini line which reads: “Eat at the Y”?

On a toned, trim, flat-bellied, pretty young adult woman, that can be a pleasant looking tat. Or invitation?
 
Ever see that tat just below the bikini line which reads: “Eat at the Y”?

On a toned, trim, flat-bellied, pretty young adult woman, that can be a pleasant looking tat. Or invitation?
There is nothing better than a meal at the Y.
 
Anyone who finds what they do to be repulsive.

Not just tattoos but body piercing, excessive plastic surgery, strange hairstyles

It is rude to criticize a woman for appearance she has no control over
But when she intentionally does things to her body, she is fair game

You're the dude drooling over Skin & Ink magazine.

How would you know?
He's a regular Nostradumbass.
 
I do not like tattoos on females. They are ugly stains on womanhood, and they signal a self-hatred among modern women that is concerning. Women are naturally beautiful and a tattoo on a female body is like drawing a mustache on the Mona Lisa or carving graffiti on a Stradivarius violin. They are cries for help by females that mark themselves for some kind of identity as a group like inmates in a maximum-security prison. They are prisoners of postmodernism, and I feel bad for them.

These are not good times for women. The Great Society destroyed the traditional family where a woman could find a man that would stay and help raise children. Intellectuals in America damaged the culture with the odious dynamic of paying females to become impregnated by a revolving door of worthless men and then collecting welfare payments. When those intellectuals discovered their mistake they did not return to policies encouraging intact families. Intellectuals in America liked the power they got by creating a dependent society and the programs that multiplied by cellular division much like cancer.

When things began to go badly with misbehavior in school, the intellectuals just started diagnosing children from fractured families with new, contrived neurological conditions Like Attention Deficit Disorder ADHD, later, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD. They preserved their growing power over average people by drugging the problem children of their bad ideas like zookeepers do with ill-acting animals. This corroded the relationship between males and females in America and created a dangerous underclass that exists solely to justify the growth of government dependence.

Where does that leave the women? If a woman in postmodern US society wants to find a decent man to support and work with her to raise a family she is competing for a dying breed. Those kinds of men were largely removed from the culture by the unwise and naĂŻve good intentions of liberal thinking intellectuals and politicians and there is no quick solution to resolve the damage done.

I see these victims everywhere, in the gym, at work, on the street. They are not trendsetters; they are like the Jews in the camps, but they voluntarily mark themselves. They want to be recognized as worthwhile, but they do it in a way that makes them taboo to the kind of men they really need.

I’m sorry, but that is just the way it is.
On the women I date, they usually say "POISON" or "DAMAGED"
 
men got tats to look rough, bikers and thugs or if you were in the military to show you served

what do women get out of having tats all over their arms or legs? what are they trying to say?

my big laugh is dudes who get a tat on the back of their leg they can't see and then do all they can to make sure
you can see it

I worked with a guy who had two.......this dipshit would wear shorts in winter to show them off and I could care less what they said

he froze his legs to advertise nobody gives a shit about........that's called stupid
 
my big laugh is dudes who get a tat on the back of their leg they can't see and then do all they can to make sure
you can see it
Women do that too. They wear the strangest cut of blouse or jeans in order to expose their tattoos. There was a sort of a weight watchers place in the center of town. It's too bad I didn't take a photo of the place because it's gone now. In the window there was a picture of the 5 women who worked there. The one in the middle had her foot turned around in a very difficult position so that you could see the tattoo on her calf. Idiot. I say idiot!
 
I do not like tattoos on females. They are ugly stains on womanhood, and they signal a self-hatred among modern women that is concerning. Women are naturally beautiful and a tattoo on a female body is like drawing a mustache on the Mona Lisa or carving graffiti on a Stradivarius violin. They are cries for help by females that mark themselves for some kind of identity as a group like inmates in a maximum-security prison. They are prisoners of postmodernism, and I feel bad for them.

These are not good times for women. The Great Society destroyed the traditional family where a woman could find a man that would stay and help raise children. Intellectuals in America damaged the culture with the odious dynamic of paying females to become impregnated by a revolving door of worthless men and then collecting welfare payments. When those intellectuals discovered their mistake they did not return to policies encouraging intact families. Intellectuals in America liked the power they got by creating a dependent society and the programs that multiplied by cellular division much like cancer.

When things began to go badly with misbehavior in school, the intellectuals just started diagnosing children from fractured families with new, contrived neurological conditions Like Attention Deficit Disorder ADHD, later, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD. They preserved their growing power over average people by drugging the problem children of their bad ideas like zookeepers do with ill-acting animals. This corroded the relationship between males and females in America and created a dangerous underclass that exists solely to justify the growth of government dependence.

Where does that leave the women? If a woman in postmodern US society wants to find a decent man to support and work with her to raise a family she is competing for a dying breed. Those kinds of men were largely removed from the culture by the unwise and naĂŻve good intentions of liberal thinking intellectuals and politicians and there is no quick solution to resolve the damage done.

I see these victims everywhere, in the gym, at work, on the street. They are not trendsetters; they are like the Jews in the camps, but they voluntarily mark themselves. They want to be recognized as worthwhile, but they do it in a way that makes them taboo to the kind of men they really need.

I’m sorry, but that is just the way it is.

Yes . They are tasteless and lack artistic and therefore aesthetic merit . Both men and women .
imo .

In fairness , I have seen literally a handful of brilliant tattoos but among thousands which were fifth rate dross.

Each to our own by all means .

But fancy branding yourself with labels which also say ----- I have little or no good taste and am also fairly stupid .
imho .
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom