what crime - wheres the evidence

[IM2]

Never mind this political impeachment, which everyone knows it is, this has been preordained since he was elected and with absolute certainty once the Dems won the House. You have Alcee Hasting asking publicly why Trump hasn't done or said anything about N Korea, about what's going on in Iran, India, Chile etc.

Does he not realize that his party is trying to impeach him? Now I'm no rocket scientist, but this might be taking some of his time, even as he gets USMCA and budgets passed.

Impeachment is a political process idiot. It always has been.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Jesus Christ the hypocrisy and irony of this post.
"Cover up"???
You do realize that Democrats held private interviews behind closed, and even locked doors???
Blows ones mind at the outright blind stupidity of some people.

it's really a good thing they are anonymous. They'd be out of work with the stupid they promote.

It truly boggles an intelligent mind how the OP can make such a post.
Downright hilarious.
Course, I guess this is what you can expect from the CNN crowd who began promoting the next narrative a week ago that Republicans would engage in cover-up and partisanship that "puts the impeachment in danger".
They knew all along what was going to happen. This was never about an impeachment. There is no where NEAR enough evidence or a high enough offense for there to be an impeachment. You can't convict someone on what you think their motive was.
But nevermind that.... the OP is deeeeeply buried in blindness to make a claim of Republican cover up when only weeks ago Democrats wouldn't allow Republicans to call witnesses and held meetings in the congressional basement behind closed doors.

You can't cure this kind of stupidity.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Never mind this political impeachment, which everyone knows it is, this has been preordained since he was elected and with absolute certainty once the Dems won the House. You have Alcee Hasting asking publicly why Trump hasn't done or said anything about N Korea, about what's going on in Iran, India, Chile etc.

Does he not realize that his party is trying to impeach him? Now I'm no rocket scientist, but this might be taking some of his time, even as he gets USMCA and budgets passed.

Impeachment is a political process idiot. It always has been.

Agreed.

It's ridiculous to demand that the senate call specific witnesses when we all know that no evidence is needed at all. Only votes.

.

 

[The Original Tree]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

 

[Oddball]

thats been the big Republican defense

and then along comes sparky -

‘Cover Up’: McConnell Won’t Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial

Can Schumer give us a summary of the testimony he expects from these witnesses and how it is relevant?

Why where they not called in the house hearings?

I might be willing to take a serious look if we get some 'splainin' first.

.

Chucky the shoe salesman wants to continue the "investigation" in the Senate....Not going to happen.

 

[IM2]

The problem as I see it, is, if the House played by fair and transparent rules,

They did.

 

[IM2]

McConnell is digging his own political grave and he knows it for a fact. Why?

AP FACT CHECK: Trump's flawed 'read the transcript' defense

So, we are to trust the strung-together accounts of people who listened to the call and are now trying to remember the content, verse the actual transcript?

It's like telling me to not trust my eyes and believe that the sky is pink.

.

Why is trump blocking witnesses?

 

[IM2]

If the senate reviews the evidence presented during the house's inquiry and finds it factually insufficient, the senate has no duty to proceed. Maybe the house should do a better job of making the case for removal BEFORE voting to impeach and sending it to the senate.

What a concept, right?

.

Trump blocked key witnesses. They need to testify.

 

[IM2]

demanding proof and evidence just morphed into sucking republican ass.

never fails - the longer and louder they whine about dems , the more lethal the blow karma shoves back up their butt.

NEVER
FUK'N
FAILS

You never fail to be a moron. Whining and crying cause you’re getting the same treatment Republicans got Fromm Schitt for brains and Nadless. Learn something. The Senate does not investigate. Schitt failed and wants somebody else to try to find something. Wrong. It’s doesn’t work that way. Seems like it’s YOU getting it blown back up your backside.

the senate just spits on the wall - question witnesses, NO WAY.

no longer interested in proof are ya sport.

Why can't they just review the testimony already presented to the house?

.

they cant lie about it - spin and twist it

they're under oath

if they do lie, they break the law

if they break the law they join their pals in prison

Turtleboi dont need no stinkin witnisses -

proof comes from witness testimony

after months of demanding proof republcans are making excuses because Turtleboi F'D em real good.

Sigh. Again moron, burden of proof is on YOU. Trump needs no defense because you have no case. As you keep running away from that FACT. Then again, facts hurt your pea brain.

Wrong.

 

[IM2]

There were no secret hearings. Republicans attended all hearings and had equal time to question and to present witnesses. Trump blocked witnesses who would have implicated trump.

 

[Siete]

day 1 - WE WANT EVIDENCE ... every fucking day, 100 times a day.

evidence comes from witness testimony

now these stupid sob's arent interested in witness testimony -

bluntly put ...

THEY HAVE NO IDEA WTF THEY WANT.

 

[The Breeze]

day 1 - WE WANT EVIDENCE ... every fucking day, 100 times a day.

evidence comes from witness testimony

now these stupid sob's arent interested in witness testimony -

bluntly put ...

THEY HAVE NO IDEA WTF THEY WANT.

Lol.

 

[jc456]

The problem as I see it, is, if the House played by fair and transparent rules,

They did.

Why didn’t the leaker fk testify?

 

[jc456]

day 1 - WE WANT EVIDENCE ... every fucking day, 100 times a day.

evidence comes from witness testimony

now these stupid sob's arent interested in witness testimony -

bluntly put ...

THEY HAVE NO IDEA WTF THEY WANT.

Lol.

Can’t make it up

 

[mikegriffith1]

We've endured weeks of this phony case in the House, where the Dems have controlled every proceeding, made every rule, approved every witness. Why in the devil weren't these "witnesses" called in the House? Why?

 

[lantern2814]

You never fail to be a moron. Whining and crying cause you’re getting the same treatment Republicans got Fromm Schitt for brains and Nadless. Learn something. The Senate does not investigate. Schitt failed and wants somebody else to try to find something. Wrong. It’s doesn’t work that way. Seems like it’s YOU getting it blown back up your backside.

the senate just spits on the wall - question witnesses, NO WAY.

no longer interested in proof are ya sport.

Why can't they just review the testimony already presented to the house?

.

they cant lie about it - spin and twist it

they're under oath

if they do lie, they break the law

if they break the law they join their pals in prison

Turtleboi dont need no stinkin witnisses -

proof comes from witness testimony

after months of demanding proof republcans are making excuses because Turtleboi F'D em real good.

Sigh. Again moron, burden of proof is on YOU. Trump needs no defense because you have no case. As you keep running away from that FACT. Then again, facts hurt your pea brain.

Wrong.

Yes you are wrong. 24/7/365. Tell us something we don’t already know.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If the senate reviews the evidence presented during the house's inquiry and finds it factually insufficient, the senate has no duty to proceed. Maybe the house should do a better job of making the case for removal BEFORE voting to impeach and sending it to the senate.

What a concept, right?

.

Trump blocked key witnesses. They need to testify.

You mean, he asserted privilege? Yes. That's how it works. You expected him to lay down and take it?

There's a way around that. Why is the house not pressing it in the courts? They have a remedy. All they are doing is bitching.

.

 

[Oddball]

If the senate reviews the evidence presented during the house's inquiry and finds it factually insufficient, the senate has no duty to proceed. Maybe the house should do a better job of making the case for removal BEFORE voting to impeach and sending it to the senate.

What a concept, right?

.

Trump blocked key witnesses. They need to testify.

Executive privilege...Suck it, Buckwheat.

 

[jc456]

If the senate reviews the evidence presented during the house's inquiry and finds it factually insufficient, the senate has no duty to proceed. Maybe the house should do a better job of making the case for removal BEFORE voting to impeach and sending it to the senate.

What a concept, right?

.

Trump blocked key witnesses. They need to testify.

Executive privilege...Suck it, Buckwheat.

I thought all of these wannabee americans knew our constitution and the powers of each branch. I'm witnessing as a result of the butthurt they have, they really don't know jack shit about it. wow. They have never heard of Executive Privilege. amazing

 

[jc456]

If the senate reviews the evidence presented during the house's inquiry and finds it factually insufficient, the senate has no duty to proceed. Maybe the house should do a better job of making the case for removal BEFORE voting to impeach and sending it to the senate.

What a concept, right?

.

Trump blocked key witnesses. They need to testify.

Executive privilege...Suck it, Buckwheat.

I thought all of these wannabee americans knew our constitution and the powers of each branch. I'm witnessing as a result of the butthurt they have, they really don't know jack shit about it. wow. They have never heard of Executive Privilege. amazing

hey, BTW, if executive privilege is within his power, how did he abuse it?