What!? Charlie Kirk Didn't Have An Autopsy!?

ChristisKing

Merry Christmas!! 😁
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Messages
46,464
Reaction score
41,565
Points
3,488
Location
USA
These people on the left are nuts I tell you nuts! Why wouldn't he have an autopsy? We all know that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk so they couldn't have a cover-up even if they wanted to. These people are ridiculous! 🙄


Oh and how could a dispatcher have authority to say this? 🤨


 
These people on the left are nuts I tell you nuts! Why wouldn't he have an autopsy? We all know that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk so they couldn't have a cover-up even if they wanted to. These people are ridiculous! 🙄


Oh and how could a dispatcher have authority to say this? 🤨




1758934049064.webp
 
I don't recall any calls for a autopsies on Thomas Crooks, James Hodgkinson or Josh Jahns.
 
These people on the left are nuts I tell you nuts! Why wouldn't he have an autopsy? We all know that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk so they couldn't have a cover-up even if they wanted to. These people are ridiculous! 🙄


Oh and how could a dispatcher have authority to say this? 🤨



If true, that is weird. In TN, if there is a murder, there is definitely an autopsy. Basically, any death not of natural causes, unless family or religious reasons, but murder? Autopsy. I have no idea what the law are in Utah.
 
If true, that is weird. In TN, if there is a murder, there is definitely an autopsy. Basically, any death not of natural causes, unless family or religious reasons, but murder? Autopsy. I have no idea what the law are in Utah.
Sometime autopsies are not performed at the request of the family. Sometime for religious purposes, sometimes because the decedent did not want one. In Kirk’s case, there is no question how he died though I agree that usually an autopsy is performed in shootings and murders.
 
The cause of death was obvious in the Kirk assassination but they never autopsied the Columbine shooters or the trannie assassins who seem to be popping up these days. Maybe they did and maybe they didn't but the left wing media never made the results known. Prescription mood altering drugs?
 
Also, the crime scene was tampered with immediately and last I heard they're doing construction on that area and paving over where it happened. Every day there's more weirdness and anomalies. So if he didn't have an autopsy, that's one more sus thing out of many.

Here's something to watch, he makes some good points:

 
According to ChatGPT, there is no verification of the rumor that no autopsy was performed. However, if it was performed, it hasn’t been released to the public.

Utah law is a tiny bit self contradictory. It mainly says that in a death by violence, an autopsy SHALL be performed. There is, nevertheless, some leeway.

But I am very doubtful of any claim that it wasn’t performed.
 
You know, it's hard to tell the truth anymore. But some of the things we are being told just don't add up. If the caliber of the shell is right, it would have exploded Kirk's head. But, Dr reports said the bullet was just under the skin. When I first saw the video, my first thought was a small caliber pistol shot from in front of him and a little to his left. That would also make a small case for the no exit wound. But the front of the neck looked like an entrance wound. If he was hit anywhere else, then there would be an entrance wound and the exit wound would be that hole in his throat. But that hole is not big enough to be an exit wound.
It doesn't make sense to me. If it was someone in front of him, the crowd would have seen or heard something close to them. I can't make it gel. What caused that projectile to stop right under the skin? I just do not believe the rifle shot would stop once it ran into a neck muscle. Neither would a modest 22. A 22 would maybe stop if it hit his vertebrae, so no exit wound. A 30-06 would have blown the back of his neck apart and his head would have just been left dangling.
 
If true, that is weird. In TN, if there is a murder, there is definitely an autopsy. Basically, any death not of natural causes, unless family or religious reasons, but murder? Autopsy. I have no idea what the law are in Utah.
Usually autopsies are performed when there are questions to the cause of death.

I'd think it's pretty obvious here.
 
Usually autopsies are performed when there are questions to the cause of death.

I'd think it's pretty obvious here.
What about the forensics needed to convict the accused shooter? To match the bullet to the gun, the angle of the trajectory, etc.?
 
15th post
Make no mistake here folks, the FBI is lying to us all. They are lying about the caliber and they are lying about the line of fire, and they are lying about his wounds. This is simply factual, AND can not be ignored by anyone that is honestly questioning the FBI narrative (lies). Maybe he was shot from behind with a 9mm, and the hole in is neck was a typical exit wound. Maybe Maybe Maybe ...but what is not in question is that he was not shot in the neck by a 30-06 rifle in front of him. NO QUESTION. Weeks later and we ( the American public) are not ALLOWED to know the truth...VERY SCARY my fellow Americans.
 
Usually autopsies are performed when there are questions to the cause of death.

I'd think it's pretty obvious here.
Are you kidding? Was there doubt in Dallas when Kennedy was shot of whether he was shot? Did you think, when police shoot somebody, there was no autopsy, knowing it was the 15 or 20 bullets? It is standard here. I thought it was standard everywhere.
 
You know, it's hard to tell the truth anymore. But some of the things we are being told just don't add up. If the caliber of the shell is right, it would have exploded Kirk's head. But, Dr reports said the bullet was just under the skin. When I first saw the video, my first thought was a small caliber pistol shot from in front of him and a little to his left. That would also make a small case for the no exit wound. But the front of the neck looked like an entrance wound. If he was hit anywhere else, then there would be an entrance wound and the exit wound would be that hole in his throat. But that hole is not big enough to be an exit wound.
It doesn't make sense to me. If it was someone in front of him, the crowd would have seen or heard something close to them. I can't make it gel. What caused that projectile to stop right under the skin? I just do not believe the rifle shot would stop once it ran into a neck muscle. Neither would a modest 22. A 22 would maybe stop if it hit his vertebrae, so no exit wound. A 30-06 would have blown the back of his neck apart and his head would have just been left dangling.
You obviously have not heard what the surgeon who treated him said. Why don't you Google that instead of making shit up?
 
Back
Top Bottom