What!? Charlie Kirk Didn't Have An Autopsy!?

Debatable...... claim is bone stopped the slug, it ending up lodging under the skin.
Very possible.
it is not possible according to gun experts, and they have videos on the net about what a 306 bullet does to... animals, dummies, you name it.. total obliteration
 
If the bullet struck Charlie's (visually heavy) rope-like necklace, it would drive that rope/ necklace into the wound. . . and that would cause a very jagged entry.

Wouldn't it?

Now, I'll grant that is a big "IF" but we can see fragments of the necklace flying out of his shirt. So, how much of a leap is it, really?


If the bullet hit the chain before entering from the right, bits of it would have been found in the wound during the autops…er, nevermind
 
Last edited:
it is not possible according to gun experts, and they have videos on the net about what a 306 bullet does to... animals, dummies, you name it.. total obliteration
The wife wanted to see what they did to her husband. The sheriff told her it wasn't a good idea as the bullet totally devastated his neck.
 
These people on the left are nuts I tell you nuts! Why wouldn't he have an autopsy? We all know that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk so they couldn't have a cover-up even if they wanted to. These people are ridiculous! 🙄


Oh and how could a dispatcher have authority to say this? 🤨



Yes he did.
 
it is not possible according to gun experts, and they have videos on the net about what a 306 bullet does to... animals, dummies, you name it.. total obliteration
Total nonsense. it not only is possible, here is an x-ray image of the same bullet still inside a person's neck.

1000006182.webp
 
The wife wanted to see what they did to her husband. The sheriff told her it wasn't a good idea as the bullet totally devastated his neck.


"The small icon, with blood traces in the crevice of the cross, was ripped from Kirk’s body by medics as they attempted to stop the bleeding after he was shot at a Turning Point USA event in Utah less than two weeks ago, Erika told the New York Times."
 

"The small icon, with blood traces in the crevice of the cross, was ripped from Kirk’s body by medics as they attempted to stop the bleeding after he was shot at a Turning Point USA event in Utah less than two weeks ago, Erika told the New York Times."
She was advised as I said.

Similar wound, similar if not identical bullet.
Yeah, I didn't remember the specifics from MLK.

Thanks
 
She was advised as I said.


Yeah, I didn't remember the specifics from MLK.

Thanks
Right.

I'm looking at the physics. We see his loosely fit necklace blow apart, and pieces fly.

There are only two things that can explain that.

Only one of these would also explain a very jagged entry wound.

1. A direct hit to the chain/ rope itself.

2. Enough expansion in his neck and chest cavity to overcome the diameter of the necklace and then expand further to the point that it shatters.

Agree?
 
Right.

I'm looking at the physics. We see his loosely fit necklace blow apart, and pieces fly.

There are only two things that can explain that.

Only one of these would also explain a very jagged entry wound.

1. A direct hit to the chain/ rope itself.

2. Enough expansion in his neck and chest cavity to overcome the diameter of the necklace and then expand further to the point that it shatters.

Agree?
Not without photos.

Notice that X Ray shows a totally severed collar bone?

I remember someone mentioned the collarbone.
 
15th post
Not without photos.

Notice that X Ray shows a totally severed collar bone?

I remember someone mentioned tha collarbone.
Photo's will answer a lot of questions for sure.

My observations are based on the evidence that we have.

Whatever the "final story" is, it has to align with and explain the physics we see.

1. We know the entry wound was large and jagged.

2. We know the bullet never exited Charlie's body.

3. We know the necklace blew apart.

4. We know the Tee Shirt Reacted violently and as it was being forced upward and towards the bullet entry.

By "know" I mean, we can reasonably believe.
 


vid on 30-06 gun and what happens when it hits things of varying density

I'd start at Point 2:00

at Point 9:17 and 9:38 it addresses exit wounds


which ALWAYS happen w/ this weapon


At Point 10:00 they shoot a coconut, which is likely harder than the human skull
 
Last edited:
Photo's will answer a lot of questions for sure.

My observations are based on the evidence that we have.

Whatever the "final story" is, it has to align with and explain the physics we see.

1. We know the entry wound was large and jagged.

2. We know the bullet never exited Charlie's body.

3. We know the necklace blew apart.

4. We know the Tee Shirt Reacted violently and as it was being forced upward and towards the bullet entry.

By "know" I mean, we can reasonably believe.
The tee shirt most likely reacted from the bullet impact on the body.

Like you said, reasonably believe.

Nothing wrong with your opinions.

Can't wait to see the ME report.
 
Back
Top Bottom