What!? Charlie Kirk Didn't Have An Autopsy!?

Are you kidding? Was there doubt in Dallas when Kennedy was shot of whether he was shot? Did you think, when police shoot somebody, there was no autopsy, knowing it was the 15 or 20 bullets? It is standard here. I thought it was standard everywhere.
Why would a family member demand their loved one's body be further desecrated if the cause of death was obvious, like in this case? Is there some suspicion he died of a drug overdose or a heart attack?

Why perform an autopsy on me and slice me open from stem to stern if I am shot in the head or neck?
 
Make no mistake here folks, the FBI is lying to us all. They are lying about the caliber and they are lying about the line of fire, and they are lying about his wounds. This is simply factual, AND can not be ignored by anyone that is honestly questioning the FBI narrative (lies). Maybe he was shot from behind with a 9mm, and the hole in is neck was a typical exit wound. Maybe Maybe Maybe ...but what is not in question is that he was not shot in the neck by a 30-06 rifle in front of him. NO QUESTION. Weeks later and we ( the American public) are not ALLOWED to know the truth...VERY SCARY my fellow Americans.
There are times when a cigar is just a cigar. Sigmund Freud.
 
What about the forensics needed to convict the accused shooter? To match the bullet to the gun, the angle of the trajectory, etc.?
I'll buy determining bullet angle. The rest comes with the LEO investigation.
Autopsy would be the one size fits all term for the ME to make a determination to the cause of death.
What I was leaning to was I can't see a full blown procedure where they'd totally disembowel him. They usually do that when it's COD can't be easy determined.
It's pretty obvious here a bullet severed the carotid, causing massive hemorrhaging, he was dead before he hit the floor.
 
Why would a family member demand their loved one's body be further desecrated if the cause of death was obvious, like in this case? Is there some suspicion he died of a drug overdose or a heart attack?

Why perform an autopsy on me and slice me open from stem to stern if I am shot in the head or neck?
There are conspiracy theories abounding on the internet, right now. Just like there were conspiracy theories, with most notable assassinations. Some say, the bullet actually came from the back and right, instead of the front and left. An autopsy would set these theories to rest. Some people think the shooting was a conspiracy. I have my doubts, but again, an autopsy might put these to rest, unless knowing what happend, for certain, is not important to those in anguish at his horrible death. You now live in a state, where it is pretty well guaranteed, if it is an unnatural death, and being shot from any direction, is definitely an unnatural death.
 
There are conspiracy theories abounding on the internet, right now. Just like there were conspiracy theories, with most notable assassinations. Some say, the bullet actually came from the back and right, instead of the front and left. An autopsy would set these theories to rest. Some people think the shooting was a conspiracy. I have my doubts, but again, an autopsy might put these to rest, unless knowing what happend, for certain, is not important to those in anguish at his horrible death. You now live in a state, where it is pretty well guaranteed, if it is an unnatural death, and being shot from any direction, is definitely an unnatural death.
I doubt it would go much further than the wound area.
 
I doubt it would go much further than the wound area.
That would be of interest. I have heard the wound on the front was large and jagged. I have never shot anything, except a shotgun where the large jagged was on the front where it struck. Bullet entry wounds are usually small holes, from my experience. Of course, I have never conducted or witnessed an autopsy.
 
I'll buy determining bullet angle. The rest comes with the LEO investigation.

Autopsy would be the one size fits all term for the ME to make a determination to the cause of death.
What I was leaning to was I can't see a full blown procedure where they'd totally disembowel him. They usually do that when it's COD can't be easy determined.
It's pretty obvious here a bullet severed the carotid, causing massive hemorrhaging, he was dead before he hit the floor.
“Autopsy” also involves measurements and so forth. If the exact position of his head, neck and body at the moment he was struck by the bullet are known (which it very much is, due to some cell phone videos), then forensics can establish the angle from which the bullet was fired with great precision. Angels can also be approximated by observing and noting the “rim collar of abrasion” which means the area around the entry wound. A perfectly circular rim collar of abrasion would tell us that the fatal shot came in straight and level. But any oblique rim collar can also tell a forensics examiner the angle and direction of the shot.

It is true that we all know the manner of death was a homicide. The additional info can include or exclude a suspect.
 
“Autopsy” also involves measurements and so forth. If the exact position of his head, neck and body at the moment he was struck by the bullet are known (which it very much is, due to some cell phone videos), then forensics can establish the angle from which the bullet was fired with great precision. Angels can also be approximated by observing and noting the “rim collar of abrasion” which means the area around the entry wound. A perfectly circular rim collar of abrasion would tell us that the fatal shot came in straight and level. But any oblique rim collar can also tell a forensics examiner the angle and direction of the shot.

It is true that we all know the manner of death was a homicide. The additional info can include or exclude a suspect.
Ducky...........

I realize all that but should have put it together more direct as I said earlier.

Thanks
 
You obviously have not heard what the surgeon who treated him said. Why don't you Google that instead of making shit up?
k.
NYPost:
“In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin. Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,”

Skin stopped a 30-06?
Bullshit, Admiral...
 
NYPost:
“In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin. Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,”

Skin stopped a 30-06?
Bullshit, Admiral...
Maybe it was somewhere down in his wrist, like a magic bullet. You can get away with that magic bullet stuff for years and years.
 
There are conspiracy theories abounding on the internet, right now. Just like there were conspiracy theories, with most notable assassinations. Some say, the bullet actually came from the back and right, instead of the front and left. An autopsy would set these theories to rest. Some people think the shooting was a conspiracy. I have my doubts, but again, an autopsy might put these to rest, unless knowing what happend, for certain, is not important to those in anguish at his horrible death. You now live in a state, where it is pretty well guaranteed, if it is an unnatural death, and being shot from any direction, is definitely an unnatural death.
Let's see the state law in TN and UT. Then we can see if you are full of shit on both counts.
 
k.
NYPost:
“In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin. Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable. Miraculous,”

Skin stopped a 30-06?
Bullshit, Admiral...
Did you read what the surgeon said? Obviously not!
 
15th post
You know, it's hard to tell the truth anymore. But some of the things we are being told just don't add up. If the caliber of the shell is right, it would have exploded Kirk's head. But, Dr reports said the bullet was just under the skin. When I first saw the video, my first thought was a small caliber pistol shot from in front of him and a little to his left. That would also make a small case for the no exit wound. But the front of the neck looked like an entrance wound. If he was hit anywhere else, then there would be an entrance wound and the exit wound would be that hole in his throat. But that hole is not big enough to be an exit wound.
It doesn't make sense to me. If it was someone in front of him, the crowd would have seen or heard something close to them. I can't make it gel. What caused that projectile to stop right under the skin? I just do not believe the rifle shot would stop once it ran into a neck muscle. Neither would a modest 22. A 22 would maybe stop if it hit his vertebrae, so no exit wound. A 30-06 would have blown the back of his neck apart and his head would have just been left dangling.
For once I agree w/ you.

People can Search ballistics videos on 30-06 guns, as I have
 
If the bullet struck Charlie's (visually heavy) rope-like necklace, it would drive that rope/ necklace into the wound. . . and that would cause a very jagged entry.

Wouldn't it?

Now, I'll grant that is a big "IF" but we can see fragments of the necklace flying out of his shirt. So, how much of a leap is it, really?

 
No way did the bullet lodge in his neck if the weapon was a 306

It's not possible.

So the conspiracy theories are not going away.....
Debatable...... claim is bone stopped the slug, it ending up lodging under the skin.
Very possible.
 
These people on the left are nuts I tell you nuts! Why wouldn't he have an autopsy? We all know that Tyler Robinson shot and killed Charlie Kirk so they couldn't have a cover-up even if they wanted to. These people are ridiculous! 🙄


Oh and how could a dispatcher have authority to say this? 🤨



Autopsy not needed; Kash will just tell us what to believe
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom