If you would consider that the "tissue" that you are referring to is a complete living human organism and not just a clump of cells, you might agree how idiotic your denials really are.
Zone1 What are "Rights"? Should we allow them to the other side?
- Thread starter Mr. Friscus
- Start date
We have words for that: it is her oven.
That zygote has DNA from father and mother so it is their tissue. If they both decide to abort it shouldn't they have that option with their tissue?
Sorry but I don't consider that clump of cells to be complete until it has functioning organs, especially a brain.
Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 8,806
- 9,138
- 2,138
- Thread starter
- #85
But you said it was a cake in her oven. Cake = human life. Thus, you state it’s okay to destroy the human life, correct?
Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 8,806
- 9,138
- 2,138
- Thread starter
- #86
No, the 2 DNA structures join together to form a single unique DNA.
Otherwise, you’d have to argue that a parent could kill or take organs from their child because their DNA is involved with forming them.
Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 8,806
- 9,138
- 2,138
- Thread starter
- #87
So you’re fine with the state pulling the plug on coma patients without their consent?
To carry the analogy too far: cake batter does NOT equal cake
Comparing mixed ingredients to an actual living organism was a false analogy from the start.
Sorry, I see nothing special about DNA, unique or not. I see that argument as a religious one
If a child has organs it may have progressed beyond the tissue stage.
It is not a scientific issue.
Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 8,806
- 9,138
- 2,138
- Thread starter
- #93
Once it’s in the oven, it’s a cake being made, and will be a cake if you don’t mess with it
Since when are the terms "tissue" and "organism" not scientifically determined?
Who's cake is it?
He's got you chasing a false analogy.
When they are used to determine what is a "person".
Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 8,806
- 9,138
- 2,138
- Thread starter
- #98
What does it matter? Once it’s a cake (child), you can’t destroy it because of a right to life.
A natural person is a biological entity as it is even defined that way in current laws.
(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
(b) As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section.
Your denials have been defeated for quite some time now.
Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 8,806
- 9,138
- 2,138
- Thread starter
- #100
It’s my analogy. How is it “false”?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Muslims: 'Kill all Jews' / 'Allahu Akbar' message at San Jose State University.- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
