What Are Liberals So Afraid Of?

[The Duke]

I am even more proud that millions of less fortunate people around the world will do just about anything to become an American.

That'd change if America is fundamentally transformed the way somebody wants it to be.

The American Dream is dead right now, you know that, right?

 

[Crepitus]

Got it.

Not even close, as expected.

 

[Crepitus]

No dear. That would be Kamala, Kerry, Schiff, Hillary, Gates et al. Not Trump. Have I recommended you to that remedial reading comprehension course I have recommended to so many others?

The First Amendment is in grave danger if Trump wins

Three Supreme Court justices want to drastically roll back the First Amendment. Trump could make it five.

www.vox.com

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[Crepitus]

Did you expect Americans to be happy after an election was stolen?

Please see post #119 as you are currently providing strong evidence of my assertions.

 

[CowboyTed]

I know that with conservatives we're afraid that if Kamala Harris wins the election that we will be part of a communist dictatorship. So what are liberals afraid of if Trump wins?

We are afraid that MAGA will decide with no proof that someone is 'part of a communist dictatorship' and with the SC backing decide to kill them under the guise of a official act...

Look it all up but the SC has said Trump is allowed to kill his political opposition if he considers them (without proof) a treat to the US...

 

[Crepitus]

Actually he’s not, being an unhinged TDSer and all. You wouldn’t know because you think like him.

Please see post #119 as you are currently providing evidence for my point.

 

[The Duke]

Please see post #119 as you are currently providing evidence for my point.

How good does it make you feel every time you post a thread telling how bad dat wascally Orange Man is?

 

[Crepitus]

How good does it make you feel every time you post a thread telling how bad dat wascally Orange Man is?

Again, more evidence. My post wasn't about tRump. It was about you.

Are you orange now?

 

[The Duke]

We are afraid that MAGA will decide with no proof that someone is 'part of a communist dictatorship' and with the SC backing decide to kill them under the guise of a official act...

Look it all up but the SC has said Trump is allowed to kill his political opposition if he considers them (without proof) a treat to the US...

You sound afraid of that on a deep and personal level, Pinky.

 

[lafayette]

If any MAGA strikes out, that will only happen once and never again because it will have colossally failed. MAGAs are incel cucks.

 

[Foxfyre]

The First Amendment is in grave danger if Trump wins

Three Supreme Court justices want to drastically roll back the First Amendment. Trump could make it five.

www.vox.com

MSN

www.msn.com

That three Supreme Court Justices believe NYT vs Sullivan should be overturned is NOT an attack on free speech. It is a flawed law that allows any media outlet to say anything about anybody no matter how damaging and all they have to do to avoid a libel or slander suit is say they didn't know it wasn't true. Aspects of NYT vs Sullivan should indeed be retained. But no media outlet should be able to make up wild stories/accusations to smear a public figure, most especially for somebody else's political gain, with impunity which Sullivan now allows.

Certainly characterizations of a public figure--he's dangerous, unreliable, unqualified, whatever are value judgments and should be under First Amendment protections. But to characterize a public figure as a rapist or thief or pedophile or whatever without having concrete evidence of that should not be allowed. And Sullivan pretty much protects that as it is currently written.

Those who want to viciously slander or libel anybody they want in the most damaging ways of course want to protect NYT vs Sullivan. Those of us who see it used to harm innocent people believe it needs to be revisited.

For damn sure, saying NYT vs Sullivan needs to be revisited is in no way any danger whatsoever to the First Amendment that was NEVER intended to allow anyone to maliciously libel and slander others.

 

[hadit]

Snarky but fun. You think libs are authoritarians, look at Vance, Trump, Abbott, Project 2025.

Good thing TRUMP! isn't on board with the Project then, huh?

 

[lafayette]

Trump loves 2025 as does Vance, Abbot, DeSantis, etc.

When discussing Trump as being truthful, Biden pointed out "It is hard to debate a liar like Trump."

 

[lafayette]

Foxfyre, imo, is absolutely correct.

 

[Hellbilly]

Good thing TRUMP! isn't on board with the Project then, huh?

His name is mentioned over 300 times.

 

[Rogue AI]

I know that with conservatives we're afraid that if Kamala Harris wins the election that we will be part of a communist dictatorship. So what are liberals afraid of if Trump wins?

There is a long list. Liberals fear white supremacists hiding in every shadow and under every bed. They also fear countless Russians stalking voting booths, there are people still unvaxed and unmasked, not to mention if the Earth Mother doesn't get her tithe the world will burn to a crisp.

 

[Independent thinker]

I know that with conservatives we're afraid that if Kamala Harris wins the election that we will be part of a communist dictatorship. So what are liberals afraid of if Trump wins?

I guess you haven't heard yet. Democrats say that Trump will take democracy away. And, he also calls people names.

 

[lafayette]

Liberals fear

 

[hadit]

His name is mentioned over 300 times.

He's publicly stated he doesn't have anything to do with it.

 

[hadit]

Liberals fear

View attachment 1024165

Oh, so they're irrational and unbound by what has been, only what they can imagine.