His words apparently incited others to act of violence.
Free speech rights go out the window then.
Maybe we don't need to deport him after all.
Loading…
uscode.house.gov
What an odd coincidence.
- Thread starter berg80
- Start date
His words apparently incited others to act of violence.
Free speech rights go out the window then.
Maybe we don't need to deport him after all.
Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
Blocking Jewish students from attending class, sure is.
Just like other extremely stupid antisemitic posters, you try to portray one as the other.
The issue raised has been addressed, he is getting a deportation hearing.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 82,292
- 41,192
- 2,615
Sounds pretty subjective. Did a court rule that way?
Has the clown been charged that way would be a more appropriate question.
He can, but he doens't have to be, nor convicted, to lose his green card and be deported.
Well, his sister got that one wrong, her decision was overturned and the law is Constitutional...weird....Law in Mahmoud Khalil’s Case Was Once Struck Down — by Trump’s Sister
The 1952 law under which the Trump administration seeks to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident who helped organize protests at Columbia University, is largely untested.
Largely, but not entirely. It was ruled unconstitutional in 1996 — by President Trump’s sister.
Mr. Trump does not have much use for a lot of judges. Last week, for instance, he called for the impeachment of “many of the Crooked Judges I am forced to appear before.” But he held his sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, in high regard.
“I will never forget the many times people would come up to me and say, ‘Your sister was the smartest person on the Court,’” he posted on social media when she died in 2023. “I was always honored by that, but understood exactly what they meant — They were right! She was a great Judge, and a great sister.”
When Judge Barry considered the 1952 law, which the Trump administration has said will play a major role in its deportation plans, she asked whether it could be squared with the Constitution. “The answer,” she wrote, “is a ringing ‘no.’”
Law in Mahmoud Khalil’s Case Was Once Struck Down — by Trump’s Sister
Judge Maryanne Trump Barry ruled that the law invoked against Mr. Khalil violated the Constitution by giving unfettered discretion to the secretary of state.www.nytimes.com
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Mario Ruiz Massieu, seeks a permanent injunction enjoining the deportation proceeding instituted against him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(4)(C)(i) and a declaration that the statute, which has not previously been construed in any reported judicial opinion, is unconstitutional. That statute, by its express terms, confers upon a single individual, the Secretary of State, the unfettered and unreviewable discretion to deport any alien lawfully within the United States, not for identified reasons relating to his or conduct in the United States or elsewhere but, rather, because that person's mere presence here would impact in some unexplained way on the foreign policy interests of the United States. Thus, the statute represents a breathtaking departure both from well established legislative precedent which commands deportation based on adjudications of defined impermissible conduct by the alien in the United States, and from well established precedent with respect to extradition which commands extradition based on adjudications of probable cause to believe that the alien has engaged in defined impermissible conduct elsewhere.
Weird, right? What are the chances trump's sister ruled on a case like this? As an aside, I'm trying to wrap my head around a relative of Don's being a serious person with the intellectual chops to attain the position of a judge. Maybe the milkman is her real dad.
Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 31,469
- 27,209
- 2,788
So, you want someone in the US who incites violence? That fits right in with all you others who incite violence.Law in Mahmoud Khalil’s Case Was Once Struck Down — by Trump’s Sister
The 1952 law under which the Trump administration seeks to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident who helped organize protests at Columbia University, is largely untested.
Largely, but not entirely. It was ruled unconstitutional in 1996 — by President Trump’s sister.
Mr. Trump does not have much use for a lot of judges. Last week, for instance, he called for the impeachment of “many of the Crooked Judges I am forced to appear before.” But he held his sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, in high regard.
“I will never forget the many times people would come up to me and say, ‘Your sister was the smartest person on the Court,’” he posted on social media when she died in 2023. “I was always honored by that, but understood exactly what they meant — They were right! She was a great Judge, and a great sister.”
When Judge Barry considered the 1952 law, which the Trump administration has said will play a major role in its deportation plans, she asked whether it could be squared with the Constitution. “The answer,” she wrote, “is a ringing ‘no.’”
Law in Mahmoud Khalil’s Case Was Once Struck Down — by Trump’s Sister
Judge Maryanne Trump Barry ruled that the law invoked against Mr. Khalil violated the Constitution by giving unfettered discretion to the secretary of state.
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Mario Ruiz Massieu, seeks a permanent injunction enjoining the deportation proceeding instituted against him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(4)(C)(i) and a declaration that the statute, which has not previously been construed in any reported judicial opinion, is unconstitutional. That statute, by its express terms, confers upon a single individual, the Secretary of State, the unfettered and unreviewable discretion to deport any alien lawfully within the United States, not for identified reasons relating to his or conduct in the United States or elsewhere but, rather, because that person's mere presence here would impact in some unexplained way on the foreign policy interests of the United States. Thus, the statute represents a breathtaking departure both from well established legislative precedent which commands deportation based on adjudications of defined impermissible conduct by the alien in the United States, and from well established precedent with respect to extradition which commands extradition based on adjudications of probable cause to believe that the alien has engaged in defined impermissible conduct elsewhere.
Weird, right? What are the chances trump's sister ruled on a case like this? As an aside, I'm trying to wrap my head around a relative of Don's being a serious person with the intellectual chops to attain the position of a judge. Maybe the milkman is her real dad.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 45,101
- 31,659
- 3,545
We voted them out of office.
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,206
- 33,318
- 2,250
So I guess he didn't actually attack anyone.
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,071
- 34,339
- 2,180
who's doing that? name one program outside the constitutional authority that exists?
Huh? Just because he wasn't changed doesn't mean he didn't attack anyone...thousands of people are attacked daily in this country, and not everyone is charged.
What a silly position.....
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,071
- 34,339
- 2,180
I thought inciting was everything. fk you assholes couldn't say trump's name enough with jan6, you know he wasn't there right?
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,206
- 33,318
- 2,250
So is it everything?
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,071
- 34,339
- 2,180
to a demofk it was. fk everyday for now fking five years. Now inciting isn't anything.
pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,206
- 33,318
- 2,250
So which is it?
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 76,147
- 66,923
- 3,615
Like Biden?
Inciting
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Democrat Dick Durbin goes all out to bring down Trump nominee
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
You can now read about the origins of Covid on the White House website
- Started by lennypartiv
- Replies: 2
-
Latest Discussions
-
So, it's nine days until the benchmark "1st hundred days" for trump
- Latest: Nuthin' Fancy
-
