What an odd coincidence.

[Rawley]

At the time, Judge Barry was a federal trial judge, and so her ruling did not establish a precedent binding on other courts. In any event, an appeals court later reversed her decision, though on grounds unrelated to its substance.

But it remains the most thorough judicial examination of the constitutionality of the law, and other judges may find its reasoning persuasive.

Well, the fact that she didn't even recognize she didn't have jurisdiction might lead one to question her constitutional reasoning.

 

[pknopp]

Like Biden?

At times also. I told Democrats that when they refused to condemn their guy it would only get worse with the next.

 

[jc456]

So which is it?

why don't you answer for us. Is inciting inciting or not?

 

[jc456]

At times also. I told Democrats that when they refused to condemn their guy it would only get worse with the next.

did obammy? did any other pres? we're still on the only donald mode.

 

[pknopp]

why don't you answer for us. Is inciting inciting or not?

Depends. I can't answer such a vast generalization. So who did this guy attack? That was the claim. I guess it was all fake news.

 

[imawhosure]

Law in Mahmoud Khalil’s Case Was Once Struck Down — by Trump’s Sister

The 1952 law under which the Trump administration seeks to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident who helped organize protests at Columbia University, is largely untested.

Largely, but not entirely. It was ruled unconstitutional in 1996 — by President Trump’s sister.

Mr. Trump does not have much use for a lot of judges. Last week, for instance, he called for the impeachment of “many of the Crooked Judges I am forced to appear before.” But he held his sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, in high regard.

“I will never forget the many times people would come up to me and say, ‘Your sister was the smartest person on the Court,’” he posted on social media when she died in 2023. “I was always honored by that, but understood exactly what they meant — They were right! She was a great Judge, and a great sister.”

When Judge Barry considered the 1952 law, which the Trump administration has said will play a major role in its deportation plans, she asked whether it could be squared with the Constitution. “The answer,” she wrote, “is a ringing ‘no.’”

Law in Mahmoud Khalil’s Case Was Once Struck Down — by Trump’s Sister

Judge Maryanne Trump Barry ruled that the law invoked against Mr. Khalil violated the Constitution by giving unfettered discretion to the secretary of state.

www.nytimes.com

OPINION​

BARRY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Mario Ruiz Massieu, seeks a permanent injunction enjoining the deportation proceeding instituted against him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(4)(C)(i) and a declaration that the statute, which has not previously been construed in any reported judicial opinion, is unconstitutional. That statute, by its express terms, confers upon a single individual, the Secretary of State, the unfettered and unreviewable discretion to deport any alien lawfully within the United States, not for identified reasons relating to his or conduct in the United States or elsewhere but, rather, because that person's mere presence here would impact in some unexplained way on the foreign policy interests of the United States. Thus, the statute represents a breathtaking departure both from well established legislative precedent which commands deportation based on adjudications of defined impermissible conduct by the alien in the United States, and from well established precedent with respect to extradition which commands extradition based on adjudications of probable cause to believe that the alien has engaged in defined impermissible conduct elsewhere.

Massieu v. Reno, 915 F. Supp. 681 - Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 1996 - Google Scholar

scholar.google.com

Weird, right? What are the chances trump's sister ruled on a case like this? As an aside, I'm trying to wrap my head around a relative of Don's being a serious person with the intellectual chops to attain the position of a judge. Maybe the milkman is her real dad.

No kidding, didn't realize you were a Mahmoud lover. But hey, whatever floats your boat.

Sounds like you’ll be thrilled to hav the organizer of anti -Semitic violence at our elite universities be allowed to return and get back to work.

Perfect example of why we need a Yawn button, maybe the Brillant or Love button?

Berg is trying to capture clicks, plain and simple. If he is the primary, or the SOCK of another account, has yet to be determined.

FACT AS I KNOW IT FROM READING THE BOARD------------->Someone DOXED IM2 a while back, and he screamed so loud, I could hear him in Indiana. I think IM2 is a political poverty pimp, but doxing him......nah. This political board, is a very decent board; although as we see, you have 4 or 5 Leftists pretending to be 15 to 20, lol. (since not enough new subscribers come on here, I can only assume that these LEFTIST heroes, are actually scamming the DNC to get paid for posts nobody ever see's but us, and why we ever respond to get them paid more, is beyond me......but I digress)

Fact-------->at some point in time.......someone is going to out these people. If they really believe what they say, then stand tall. If you do not...............you are in deep doo, as nobody is going to back you!

 

[BluesLegend]

If he is a legal citizen, he stays, if not….he goes.

How is this complex?

You can't come into OUR country as a guest and start running your mouth and stirring up trouble. You will asked to leave, or sent packing.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Law in Mahmoud Khalil’s Case Was Once Struck Down — by Trump’s Sister

The 1952 law under which the Trump administration seeks to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident who helped organize protests at Columbia University, is largely untested.

Largely, but not entirely. It was ruled unconstitutional in 1996 — by President Trump’s sister.

Mr. Trump does not have much use for a lot of judges. Last week, for instance, he called for the impeachment of “many of the Crooked Judges I am forced to appear before.” But he held his sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, in high regard.

“I will never forget the many times people would come up to me and say, ‘Your sister was the smartest person on the Court,’” he posted on social media when she died in 2023. “I was always honored by that, but understood exactly what they meant — They were right! She was a great Judge, and a great sister.”

When Judge Barry considered the 1952 law, which the Trump administration has said will play a major role in its deportation plans, she asked whether it could be squared with the Constitution. “The answer,” she wrote, “is a ringing ‘no.’”

Law in Mahmoud Khalil’s Case Was Once Struck Down — by Trump’s Sister

Judge Maryanne Trump Barry ruled that the law invoked against Mr. Khalil violated the Constitution by giving unfettered discretion to the secretary of state.

www.nytimes.com

OPINION​

BARRY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Mario Ruiz Massieu, seeks a permanent injunction enjoining the deportation proceeding instituted against him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(4)(C)(i) and a declaration that the statute, which has not previously been construed in any reported judicial opinion, is unconstitutional. That statute, by its express terms, confers upon a single individual, the Secretary of State, the unfettered and unreviewable discretion to deport any alien lawfully within the United States, not for identified reasons relating to his or conduct in the United States or elsewhere but, rather, because that person's mere presence here would impact in some unexplained way on the foreign policy interests of the United States. Thus, the statute represents a breathtaking departure both from well established legislative precedent which commands deportation based on adjudications of defined impermissible conduct by the alien in the United States, and from well established precedent with respect to extradition which commands extradition based on adjudications of probable cause to believe that the alien has engaged in defined impermissible conduct elsewhere.

Massieu v. Reno, 915 F. Supp. 681 - Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 1996 - Google Scholar

scholar.google.com

Weird, right? What are the chances trump's sister ruled on a case like this? As an aside, I'm trying to wrap my head around a relative of Don's being a serious person with the intellectual chops to attain the position of a judge. Maybe the milkman is her real dad.

This shit administration doesn't know how to do anything right.

 

[Delldude]

This shit administration doesn't know how to do anything right.

Got rid of Biden without flexing a muscle......

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Got rid of Biden without flexing a muscle......

If you're not going to say anything intelligent, don't reply.

 

[ColonelAngus]

You can't come into OUR country as a guest and start running your mouth and stirring up trouble. You will asked to leave, or sent packing.

Imagine if you went to CHINA and started shit talking Xi?

Or Ukraine and started shit taking Zelensky?

These assholes want CONSERVATIVE CITIZENS censored, but not visitors?

Huh?

 

[berg80]

So, you want someone in the US who incites violence? That fits right in with all you others who incite violence.

See post #35. Then post any evidence you have showing Khalil incited violence.

 

[toobfreak]

What an odd coincidence.​

What--- that you would support another Muslim terrorist? I perfectly expected it.

 

[berg80]

This shit administration doesn't know how to do anything right.

As I have mentioned before on a few other threads, trump possesses the power to remove those men but only after they have received due process. The fact that the administration has failed to do so makes me wonder if they have actual evidence of criminality or gang membership among most of them.

 

[Seymour Flops]

As I have mentioned before on a few other threads, trump possesses the power to remove those men but only after they have received due process. The fact that the administration has failed to do so makes me wonder if they have actual evidence of criminality or gang membership among most of them.

What "due process" is called for in the Alien Enemies act?

Look, and tell me:

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title50/chapter3&edition=prelim

 

[Delldude]

If you're not going to say anything intelligent, don't reply.

Truth hurt?
Neighbor has a safe space you can use.

 

[jc456]

Depends. I can't answer such a vast generalization. So who did this guy attack? That was the claim. I guess it was all fake news.

So you can’t answer what inciting is? You really are a turd

 

[pknopp]

So you can’t answer what inciting is? You really are a turd

I really can't. But that wasn't the issue.

 

[struth]

Depends. I can't answer such a vast generalization. So who did this guy attack? That was the claim. I guess it was all fake news.

Not sure if he did or didn’t, nor do I care.

One doesn’t have to attack someone to lose their immigration status and be deported

Your question is pointless

 

[jc456]

I really can't. But that wasn't the issue.

I knew it. You’re no smarter than a turd