SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
So, you believe we should assume all scientific conclusions are incorrect. That seems like a logical position... for a complete fucking idiot or a TROLL
When they are dealing with an entity as imminently observable, and measurable as the climate, and energy movement though it...and no observed, measured evidence exists to support the accepted AGW hypothesis over natural variability, then yes, anyone with any critical thinking skills whatsoever should be seeing red flags all over the place. Exactly how does one come to such a solid conclusion regarding an observable, measurable entity, when there is no observed, measured evidence to support the hypothesis over natural variability. Are they claiming that we are causing the climate to change but it looks just like natural variability?