The Federalist - another Questionable Source. Tell us, did the Federalist raise any objections when the Trump DOJ prosecuted Michael Cohen for his participation in these crimes? Every argument you can make about this being a "political prosecution" is rendered bullshit by this one simple fact. None of you objected to Cohen's prosecution.
- Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
mediabiasfactcheck.com
There is no spin Nostra Dumbass. If Garland wanted to prosecute Trump, he has a list of things he could be going after him for starting with "What happened to the Inauguration Fund?". $100 million which was never accounted for.
Then there is all of the "pay for play" - untendered government contracts awarded to corporations whose executive belong to his golf clubs or who book events at this Washington Hotel. Employing illegal aliens to work at his golf courses and vineyard. Billions missing from the PPP loan fund which was under White House control. Execessive payments made to the Trump Corporation for hotel rooms for the Secret Service at Trump Resorts when the Resorts were closed. Obstruction of Justice as set out in the Mueller Investigation, and during his Administration. The selling of pardons.
You can google all of it.