Well regulated militia

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,621
138
Well regulated militia can be created on the basis of the police. The US police are subordinate to the state and independent of the federals. Armed male can be trained by the police, and participate in police operations as an auxiliary force. This is the shortest way to create a militia.
The constitution says that the creation of a militia is necessary.
1643578712810.jpeg
 
That was 245 years ago.

Justice Scalia ruled on Heller that the only relevant part is "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

So that's where we are today. At least until the next Supreme Court decision.
We have a well regulated militia. It is called the National Guard.
 
mi·li·tia
/məˈliSHə/
Learn to pronounce

noun

  1. a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.
    "creating a militia was no answer to the army's manpower problem"
    • a military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities in opposition to a regular army.
    • all able-bodied civilians eligible by law for military service
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
We have a well regulated militia. It is called the National Guard.

It has a subordination to the federals, it is not provided for in the constitution. Most likely they will side with the feds in the event of a conflict.
 
mi·li·tia
/məˈliSHə/
Learn to pronounce

noun

  1. a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.
    "creating a militia was no answer to the army's manpower problem"
    • a military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities in opposition to a regular army.
    • all able-bodied civilians eligible by law for military service

Thank you.

So many people try to make the word "militia" into a standing army. It isn't. It is citizens picking up their own arms to defend their nation in a time of need. What kind of lunatic would invade a nation with +400 guns in private citizen's hands. Hitler and Yamamoto knew that.
 
That was 245 years ago.

Justice Scalia ruled on Heller that the only relevant part is "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

So that's where we are today. At least until the next Supreme Court decision.
The US Constitution specifies we should have no standing military we should only have Militias
 
Then you need to immigrate somewhere else. California sucks, but they ARE part of America and those of us who swore an oath to defend the Constitution and this country, will do so for EVERY State in the Union.
I’m like a Confederate soldier.. i’m going rogue
 
It has a subordination to the federals, it is not provided for in the constitution. Most likely they will side with the feds in the event of a conflict.
No state could afford them on their own, but they spend far more time on state duty than Federal duty and work at the behest of state governors (not title 32 Federal duty) in the event of civil (or uncivil, depending on your point of view) disturbance or state security missions. I have been on one of these state civil disturbance mission for over a week. Spooky sh*t, knowing you are facing your fellow citizens. They are the modern citizen soldier with a lineage back to the militias at the founding of this country, no more, no less.
 

Forum List

Back
Top