Well, Now It’s Out In The Open….

But it is "us vs them," it is Americaism vs communism, you dunce.


I bet you voted for this:


Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system
Things which have nothing to do with communism.
 
So, today’s Democrat Party is not an American party, and if you vote Democrat you are casting aside any American values, heritage, and identity…….comrade.
Doesn't matter. Your knowledge of what "American values, heritage, and identity" are is spotty at best. And there's certainly no imperative that American citizens agree with those things to begin with. In a free country, they don't have to. If you're against the freedom of people to diverge from things that are potentially irrelevant, then that's not very "American" of you. Ironic.

And even if there was a "pure source" of "American values", the actual values of most people who live in America simply don't come from it.

"America" is a transient entity and will eventually go the way of Rome, so there's certainly no need to get too attached to it.
 
You’re dodging again. I pointed out that your strategy isn’t to make clear arguments; it’s to smear large groups (like Democrats) using guilt by association, and then deflect when challenged. Now you’re walking it back slightly, but still adding a personal insult ("fools like you") instead of dealing with the actual issue.

Let’s stay focused.

Your original post made a sweeping claim about communists taking over the Democratic party.

What specific evidence do you have for that?
Who exactly are the “communists”?
What power are they exercising that shows a takeover?

If you can’t or won’t answer that with facts, not name-calling or baiting, then it proves the point. This isn’t a good-faith argument. It’s just narrative warfare.
Do you honestly believe that if they are communists to their core, they would admit to it?
 
Doesn't matter. Your knowledge of what "American values, heritage, and identity" are is spotty at best. And there's certainly no imperative that American citizens agree with those things to begin with. In a free country, they don't have to. If you're against the freedom of people to diverge from things that are potentially irrelevant, then that's not very "American" of you. Ironic.

And even if there was a "pure source" of "American values", the actual values of most people who live in America simply don't come from it.

"America" is a transient entity and will eventually go the way of Rome, so there's certainly no need to get too attached to it.

Don't forget one of the fundamental "American values" the country was founded on was SLAVERY.

You can't erase that part of our history, like you can Epstein's client list.
 
Do you honestly believe that if they are communists to their core, they would admit to it?
This is like the use of illegal alien, when they have committed no crime.

The use of communist when they mean socialist is only if you don't know the difference, or don't care that there is a difference.
 
The constitution gives government great powers, such as regulating interstate commerce and building post roads.

That effectively means they can regulate business (means of production) in the united states. (see Wickard V Filburn)

The constitution only limits government to those things it didn't clearly enumerate such as regulation of interstate commerce.
Are you a govenment school grad?


I just love being correct.
 
Apparently what they didn't tell YOU about regulation, is that socialism is regulation through the peoples representatives.
You really don't belong in this country.


I bet you hear that a lot.
 
Doesn't matter. Your knowledge of what "American values, heritage, and identity" are is spotty at best. And there's certainly no imperative that American citizens agree with those things to begin with. In a free country, they don't have to. If you're against the freedom of people to diverge from things that are potentially irrelevant, then that's not very "American" of you. Ironic.

And even if there was a "pure source" of "American values", the actual values of most people who live in America simply don't come from it.

"America" is a transient entity and will eventually go the way of Rome, so there's certainly no need to get too attached to it.
So this is the"free country" you voted for?



  • Contrary to the term itself, Kamala has stated that illegal aliens are not criminals
  • She has stated that she wishes to decriminalize illegally crossing the border, similar to the way Democrats have decriminalized shoplifting.
  • She has argued against, not the death penalty, just the death penalty for cop killers
  • She favors defunding the police
  • She authored a fund to bail out domestic terrorists, called the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
  • Joining Communist Bernie Sanders in “Medicare For All,” in which she argues for all private health insurance. BTW, some 220 million Americans have private health insurance, 65% of the population
  • Kamala plans to include all the illegals in the Medicare plan
  • Eliminate and ban all fracking which produces 64% of the total crude oil produced in the United States in 2023.
  • She supported a law which bans arrests for shoplifting under $950.
  • She supports indicting Israel for war crimes against Hamas
  • Believes in banning internal combustion engines, allowing only electric vehicles.
  • As Attn’y General, her office supported Prop 57 that put rapists and murders back on the street after serving a fraction of their sentence
  • Supported a state law that keeps parents from knowing about the indoctrination of their children toward gender transition
  • When the nation was wracked by Democrat-fueled George Floyd riots Kamala said the riots should not stop:




“As a U.S. senator from California from 2017 to 2021, she had a more leftist voting record even than socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, Vermont independent.” Harris had a more leftist voting record in Senate than Sanders

Kamala wrote “Trump supports a national abortion ban.” Of course that is a lie. Kamala Harris na Instagramie : "Donald Trump supports a national abortion ban. President @JoeBiden and I will do everything in our power to stop him and restore women's reproductive freedom."

Kamala was the deciding vote on the $1.9T American Rescue Plan that caused this inflation. Now prices are up nearly 30%.
 
Don't forget one of the fundamental "American values" the country was founded on was SLAVERY.

You can't erase that part of our history, like you can Epstein's client list.
And you Democrats instituted a war to maintain it.
 
Are you a govenment school grad?


I just love being correct.
Well that's a rare bit of self love on your part.
You may wish you were right all the time, but you aren't.
Such as I pointed out, the constitution has socialism at it's foundation. From it's goal to promote the general welfare, to specifically enumerating congresses power to regulate.
 
Besides illegally entering the country, tax fraud, identity theft and driving without a license or car insurance.
There are a large number who entered the country legally, but didn't leave when their VISA expired. They committed no crime, but are still labeled "illegal aliens"

Secondly why are you complaining about them driving without a license or insurance, and then out of the other side of your mouth, complaining about states like California that issue drivers licenses to undocumented residents. Allowing them to get car insurance.
 
Side note: The vast majority of people driving without a license, or on a suspended or revoked license. As well as driving without insurance....

Are US citizens.
 
There are a large number who entered the country legally, but didn't leave when their VISA expired. They committed no crime, but are still labeled "illegal aliens"

Secondly why are you complaining about them driving without a license or insurance, and then out of the other side of your mouth, complaining about states like California that issue drivers licenses to undocumented residents. Allowing them to get car insurance.

There are a large number who entered the country legally, but didn't leave when their VISA expired. They committed no crime, but are still labeled "illegal aliens"

Yes, overstaying your visa is also illegal. And they are aliens.

Secondly why are you complaining about them driving without a license or insurance

Because they drive without a license or insurance.

And what about all the tax fraud and identity theft?
 
Side note: The vast majority of people driving without a license, or on a suspended or revoked license. As well as driving without insurance....

Are US citizens.

Yes, that definitely makes the crimes of illegal aliens less serious.

DURR
 
15th post
The mainstream media spent at least four years lying to Americans about Biden's health. Will they be able to downplay the communist/socialist infiltration of the democrat party much longer?
 
Well that's a rare bit of self love on your part.
You may wish you were right all the time, but you aren't.
Such as I pointed out, the constitution has socialism at it's foundation. From it's goal to promote the general welfare, to specifically enumerating congresses power to regulate.
What you wrote is just too stupid for words.

AI Overview

No, the U.S. Constitution is not based on socialism. It is fundamentally a framework for a limited government with a focus on individual liberties and a free market economy. While the Constitution doesn't explicitly endorse laissez-faire capitalism, it doesn't promote socialist principles like social ownership of the means of production or centralized economic planning either.

Here's why:
  • Protection of private property and contracts:
    .

    The Constitution, through the Bill of Rights, explicitly protects private property rights and the freedom to enter into contracts. This contrasts with socialism's emphasis on social or collective ownership of resources.

  • Limited government:
    .

    The Constitution establishes a system of checks and balances designed to limit the power of the government and protect individual liberties. Socialism, in its various forms, often involves a more centralized and interventionist state.

  • Emphasis on individual liberty:
    .

    The Bill of Rights guarantees fundamental freedoms such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, which are not central tenets of socialist ideology.

  • "Democratic process" for policy decisions:
    .

    The Constitution allows for a democratic process where citizens can decide on economic and social policies, including those related to taxation, welfare, and regulation. However, this process is not inherently socialist and allows for a range of policy choices.

  • Federalism:
    .

    The Constitution's structure of federalism, with power divided between the federal and state governments, also works against the centralization required for socialist economic planning.
While some aspects of the Constitution, such as the power to tax and spend, could be used to implement some social welfare programs, this doesn't transform the overall document into a socialist one. The Constitution's core principles align more closely with classical liberalism and individual liberties than with socialist ideals.
 
Well that's a rare bit of self love on your part.
You may wish you were right all the time, but you aren't.
Such as I pointed out, the constitution has socialism at it's foundation. From it's goal to promote the general welfare, to specifically enumerating congresses power to regulate.
I said earlier that you are an imbecile.


But it bears repeating: You are an imbecile.
 
Back
Top Bottom