Well, Now It’s Out In The Open….

The majority of the world's countries have already united together in the Brics alliance, with the common purpose of fighting to stop the rise of the 21st. century fascist regime.

Democracy will have to wait.

China has devised a system that's as close to democracy as possible, when fascism once again threatens world war.
The idea that BRICS is a united front fighting against a rising fascist regime is a serious distortion of reality. BRICS is not a cohesive ideological alliance. It’s an economic bloc composed of countries with vastly different, and often competing interests. China and India, for example, are frequently at odds both geopolitically and militarily.

Also, describing China’s political system as “as close to democracy as possible” is extremely inaccurate. China is a one party authoritarian regime with no free elections, no freedom of the press, systematic censorship, widespread surveillance, and harsh punishment for dissent. Simply opposing western influence does not make a government democratic or righteous. Framing BRICS as a moral resistance movement while ignoring the authoritarian nature of its most powerful member is not a defense of democracy. It’s a dangerous form of narrative inversion. If democracy truly matters, we shouldn’t excuse autocracy just because it wears a different jersey.
 
Last edited:
The idea that BRICS is a united front fighting against a rising fascist regime is a serious distortion of reality. BRICS is not a cohesive ideological alliance. It’s an economic bloc composed of countries with vastly different, and often competing interests. China and India, for example, are frequently at odds both geopolitically and militarily.
Don't be fooled by the Brics countries not demonstrating violence. Iran is an example of the Brics' countries violence that is permissible. Iran is now ready!
Also, describing China’s political system as “as close to democracy as possible” is extremely inaccurate. China is a one party authoritarian regime with no free elections, no freedom of the press, systematic censorship, widespread surveillance, and harsh punishment for dissent.
That's pretty close to the point I've made. Democracy has to be put on the back burner when China is so involved in defending itself from threats of US aggression. Waiting for democracy to make decisions is not possible. America's presidents have made that point better than any other country. Once again the opposing ideologies of communism and fascist are due to clash.
The difference with China is, they have found an equilibrium in which government is accepted and applauded by the people.
Simply opposing western influence does not make a government democratic or righteous.
Righteousness doesn't come from only democracies. Fascism has been demonstrated to produce that in the people's minds for a limited amount of time at least. And of course socialism can too in times of peace in which America will no longer be capable of threatening.
Framing BRICS as a moral resistance movement while ignoring the authoritarian nature of its most powerful member is not a defense of democracy. It’s a dangerous form of narrative inversion. If democracy truly matters, we shouldn’t excuse autocracy just because it wears a different jersey.
And once again, democracy is not possible for China, Russia, and Iran, in these times of the US threatening.

Communism is once again the only real deterrent to further US aggression. It's not as if America's 40 wars of aggression since the end of WW2, doesn't bring the point home!

Thank you for your opinions. I find you to be a worthy exception to the usual shitflinging assholes.
 
Don't be fooled by the Brics countries not demonstrating violence. Iran is an example of the Brics' countries violence that is permissible. Iran is now ready!

That's pretty close to the point I've made. Democracy has to be put on the back burner when China is so involved in defending itself from threats of US aggression. Waiting for democracy to make decisions is not possible. America's presidents have made that point better than any other country. Once again the opposing ideologies of communism and fascist are due to clash.
The difference with China is, they have found an equilibrium in which government is accepted and applauded by the people.

Righteousness doesn't come from only democracies. Fascism has been demonstrated to produce that in the people's minds for a limited amount of time at least. And of course socialism can too in times of peace in which America will no longer be capable of threatening.

And once again, democracy is not possible for China, Russia, and Iran, in these times of the US threatening.

Communism is once again the only real deterrent to further US aggression. It's not as if America's 40 wars of aggression since the end of WW2, doesn't bring the point home!

Thank you for your opinions. I find you to be a worthy exception to the usual shitflinging assholes.
We need to draw a sharper line between pragmatism and endorsement. You seem to suggest that authoritarianism is an unfortunate necessity when facing external threats like U.S. aggression, but we have to be careful not to romanticize or justify autocracy just because it presents itself as anti-imperialist. China’s internal suppression of journalists, minorities, dissidents, can’t be waved away as strategic defense. That’s not equilibrium; it’s control.

As for BRICS, pointing to Iran’s alignment as proof of acceptable violence doesn’t show unity. It shows opportunism. These are transactional relationships, not ideological ones, and while I agree democracy has been weaponized by the west at times, that doesn’t mean we should abandon the principle itself. If anything, it means we should protect it from being hollowed out on both sides, by western hypocrisy and by eastern authoritarianism posing as resistance. If we want something better than the current global order, we can’t afford to confuse counter-hegemony with justice. The new order must be more free, not less.
 
You’re dodging again. I pointed out that your strategy isn’t to make clear arguments; it’s to smear large groups (like Democrats) using guilt by association, and then deflect when challenged. Now you’re walking it back slightly, but still adding a personal insult ("fools like you") instead of dealing with the actual issue.

Let’s stay focused.

Your original post made a sweeping claim about communists taking over the Democratic party.

What specific evidence do you have for that?
Who exactly are the “communists”?
What power are they exercising that shows a takeover?

If you can’t or won’t answer that with facts, not name-calling or baiting, then it proves the point. This isn’t a good-faith argument. It’s just narrative warfare.
Now that I've forced you to reveal that you are one of the mindless drones who will vote for any platform the party tells you to......in this case it's communism, anti-Semitism, racism and freeing criminals, your posts and opinions get tossed where they belong.


BTW, here is a Democrat congressman who does differentiate between American policies ane communist/Democrat policies:


 
Ad hominem and projection. Instead of addressing the questions I posed about evidence and specifics, you choose to label me with insults and conspiracy rhetoric. If your goal is honest discussion, answer the questions. If it’s just to dismiss dissent, then that says everything about your willingness to engage.

I’m waiting.
All these folks are simply describing what you are.
 
Now that I've forced you to reveal that you are one of the mindless drones who will vote for any platform the party tells you to......in this case it's communism, anti-Semitism, racism and freeing criminals, your posts and opinions get tossed where they belong.


BTW, here is a Democrat congressman who does differentiate between American policies ane communist/Democrat policies:


Once again, when backed into a corner with direct, factual questions, you don't answer. You double down on personal attacks and vague associations. Your strategy is rhetorical attrition, not truth-seeking. If you can’t win the argument, you try to drown it in sludge. Calling someone a “mindless drone” isn’t a substitute for facts. It’s just noise. I’m asking you to name names and policies. You still haven’t. If your argument is real, prove it. If it’s just propaganda, keep posting links without context and calling people names. That tells us everything we need to know.
 
All these folks are simply describing what you are.
Another perfect example of a non-response as a response. You're trying to turn groupthink into validation. “Everyone else sees it, so I don’t have to prove it.” That's a psychological deflection, not an argument. It sidesteps all of my points while pretending to win by consensus.

Still no answer to the actual questions. You’re not debating; you’re chanting.
 
I still remember Obama trying to destroy Joe The Plumber because he said that Obama acted like a socialist.

Destroy? You really need better sources outside of the voices in your head. Joe the Plumber was an extreme right wing operating Activists. Hell he makes even you look like a leftie.
 
We need to draw a sharper line between pragmatism and endorsement. You seem to suggest that authoritarianism is an unfortunate necessity when facing external threats like U.S. aggression, but we have to be careful not to romanticize or justify autocracy just because it presents itself as anti-imperialist. China’s internal suppression of journalists, minorities, dissidents, can’t be waved away as strategic defense. That’s not equilibrium; it’s control.
China's people are being treated very well by government and they don't want to change that. Russia's government receives support of over 80%. Americans have stood up and have chosen fascism over the failure of their corrupt democratic system.
As for BRICS, pointing to Iran’s alignment as proof of acceptable violence doesn’t show unity. It shows opportunism.
Iran's ambitions are in defending itself. You can't stand with and defend the Zionist regime's genocide.
These are transactional relationships, not ideological ones, and while I agree democracy has been weaponized by the west at times, that doesn’t mean we should abandon the principle itself. If anything,
America's democracy has always been weaponized and always involved in continuous wars. Democracies principles can't be adhered to when America has a gun to the head of countries that prefer a different way forward.
it means we should protect it from being hollowed out on both sides, by western hypocrisy and by eastern authoritarianism posing as resistance. If we want something better than the current global order, we can’t afford to confuse counter-hegemony with justice. The new order must be more free, not less.
At this point in time it's resistance. It may become authoritarianism if the world can ever find peace..

I'm not really sure that we can agree on anything? Maybe my last comment?

IMO authoritarianism has to be judged by the authority in question. There's little doubt to me that America is experimenting with an authoritarian regime.
 
Once again, when backed into a corner with direct, factual questions, you don't answer. You double down on personal attacks and vague associations. Your strategy is rhetorical attrition, not truth-seeking. If you can’t win the argument, you try to drown it in sludge. Calling someone a “mindless drone” isn’t a substitute for facts. It’s just noise. I’m asking you to name names and policies. You still haven’t. If your argument is real, prove it. If it’s just propaganda, keep posting links without context and calling people names. That tells us everything we need to know.
You couldn't find anything in the OP that hurt you so deeply, that isn't true, accurate and correct.

You wouldn't admit you voted for the party with fascist policy.

You can't alter voting for the party no matter how communist it becomes.


I guess everyone except you understands what you are, huh?
 
You couldn't find anything in the OP that hurt you so deeply, that isn't true, accurate and correct.

You wouldn't admit you voted for the party with fascist policy.

You can't alter voting for the party no matter how communist it becomes.


I guess everyone except you understands what you are, huh?
You still refuse to engage with any actual evidence or details. Instead, you double down on baseless personal attacks and assumptions about my voting habits. If your position is truly grounded in facts, then name names, cite policies, and make a clear case. Otherwise, it’s just noise meant to silence dissent and avoid accountability. I’m not here to play your games or accept your labels. I’m here for honest discussion. The ball is in your court.

Do your opinions actually have real substance, or are they just empty rhetoric?
 
The majority of the world's countries have already united together in the Brics alliance, with the common purpose of fighting to stop the rise of the 21st. century fascist regime.
Lemme get my popcorn
Democracy will have to wait.
The historical motto [as well as rallying cry] of white liberals everywhere
China has devised a system that's as close to democracy as possible, when fascism once again threatens world war.
Thanks to communists/communism it is as close as they will ever get
 
Another dodge. If you think I’m wrong, explain why with evidence or logic instead of slinging insults.

Is there any actual substance behind your views?
Once AGAIN, here's Uncle Yuri to set the record straight...



This is a 1985 interview of Yuri Bezmenov, a former Soviet KGB agent who defected to the West.

Interviewer: The Soviets use the phase, “ideological subversion”. What do they mean by that?


Bezmenov: Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate overt and open. You can see it with your own eyes. All you have to do, all the American mass media has to do is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes and they can see. There’s no mystery. There’s nothing to do with espionage. I know espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic, it sells more deodorants through their advertising, probably. That’s why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond type of thrillers. But in reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all! According to my opinion, and the opinion of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, in the language of the KGB, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is, to change the perception of reality of every American to such as extent that in spite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community and their country.

It’s a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages, the first one being demoralization. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which is required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of your enemy. In other words, Marxism / Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism.


The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 25 years, actually it’s over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is being done by Americans to Americans thanks to a lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he’s going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crushes his balls, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.

The next stage is destabilization. This time, the subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby, it doesn’t matter anymore. This time, and it takes only from 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation, what matters is essentials, the economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see quite clearly that in some areas in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist / Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.

The next stage of course is crisis. It may take only up to 6 weeks to bring a country up to the verge of crisis. You can see them in Central America now.

And after crisis, with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have a period of so called normalization. It may last indefinitely. Normalization is a cynical expression born from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in ’68, Comrade Brezhnev said, “Now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized!” This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all these smucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and a paradise on earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition, and to put a Big Brother government in Washington D.C. With benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of things, never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not.
__________________________________

This is REAL HISTORY.
We are living within the RESULTS of all that NOW.
Funny thing happened, though.
Marxism DIED in Russia circa 1991 after sowing the seeds of that stupidity here for a CENTURY.
And then, Metallica played Moscow.
Now, we are stuck with the mess LEFT behind, and apparently you are Exhibit A.

Get well soon.
 
You still refuse to engage with any actual evidence or details. Instead, you double down on baseless personal attacks and assumptions about my voting habits. If your position is truly grounded in facts, then name names, cite policies, and make a clear case. Otherwise, it’s just noise meant to silence dissent and avoid accountability. I’m not here to play your games or accept your labels. I’m here for honest discussion. The ball is in your court.

Do your opinions actually have real substance, or are they just empty rhetoric?
Take a look at the election results, and the internal war going on in your party: stupid partisons who can't read the tea leaves are a problem for the party.

That means you.
 
Once AGAIN, here's Uncle Yuri to set the record straight...



This is a 1985 interview of Yuri Bezmenov, a former Soviet KGB agent who defected to the West.

Interviewer: The Soviets use the phase, “ideological subversion”. What do they mean by that?


Bezmenov: Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate overt and open. You can see it with your own eyes. All you have to do, all the American mass media has to do is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes and they can see. There’s no mystery. There’s nothing to do with espionage. I know espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic, it sells more deodorants through their advertising, probably. That’s why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond type of thrillers. But in reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all! According to my opinion, and the opinion of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, in the language of the KGB, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is, to change the perception of reality of every American to such as extent that in spite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community and their country.

It’s a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages, the first one being demoralization. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which is required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of your enemy. In other words, Marxism / Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism.


The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 25 years, actually it’s over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is being done by Americans to Americans thanks to a lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he’s going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crushes his balls, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.

The next stage is destabilization. This time, the subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby, it doesn’t matter anymore. This time, and it takes only from 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation, what matters is essentials, the economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see quite clearly that in some areas in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist / Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.

The next stage of course is crisis. It may take only up to 6 weeks to bring a country up to the verge of crisis. You can see them in Central America now.

And after crisis, with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have a period of so called normalization. It may last indefinitely. Normalization is a cynical expression born from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in ’68, Comrade Brezhnev said, “Now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized!” This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all these smucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and a paradise on earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition, and to put a Big Brother government in Washington D.C. With benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of things, never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not.
__________________________________

This is REAL HISTORY.
We are living within the RESULTS of all that NOW.
Funny thing happened, though.
Marxism DIED in Russia circa 1991 after sowing the seeds of that stupidity here for a CENTURY.
And then, Metallica played Moscow.
Now, we are stuck with the mess LEFT behind, and apparently you are Exhibit A.

Get well soon.

I’ve seen this Bezmenov interview pop up before, and as always, it’s being wielded like a sledgehammer where a scalpel is needed. Let’s dissect it point by point, not to dismiss concerns about manipulation, propaganda, or societal decay, but to think clearly without falling for Cold War ghosts that are still haunting us 40 years later.

1. “Ideological subversion is overt… you can see it with your own eyes.”

This opening conflates “what you see” with what’s true, skipping the real issue: interpretation. All propaganda, left, right, or otherwise, thrives not because it's visible, but because it's emotionally satisfying to certain narratives. What Bezmenov offers isn’t objectivity; it’s a script designed to validate Cold War paranoia. Seeing something doesn’t mean you understand it.

2. “Only 15% of KGB effort is espionage. 85% is psychological warfare.”

The number sounds authoritative but is unverifiable. It's designed to shock, not inform. Most intelligence agencies don’t publish a pie chart of their secret budgets. The point? This “85%” line isn’t insight; it’s salesmanship, meant to inflate Bezmenov’s personal importance.

3. “Demoralization takes 15-20 years, enough to educate one generation.”

So one whole generation is hopelessly brainwashed? That assumes education is monolithic and top-down. In reality, people grow up under diverse influences, families, communities, religions, countercultures, books, and now the internet. The claim that a generation has been “successfully demoralized” is simplistic and, frankly, nonsense.

4. “Marxism/Leninism is being pumped into students’ heads…”

First off, if that’s true, it’s a colossal failure, since the U.S. is still overwhelmingly capitalist. What’s really going on is some educators challenge American exceptionalism, talk about systemic issues, and teach critical thinking. That’s not Marxism; it’s adulthood, and often it makes people more thoughtful, not less patriotic.

5. “Even if you show proof to a demoralized person, they won’t believe it.”

This is the classic unfalsifiable claim. It’s rhetorical insurance. If you disagree with him, it proves you’re brainwashed. It's circular logic, a “heads I win, tails you lose” setup. Real argument requires the possibility of disproof.

6. “Destabilization takes 2-5 years: focus on economy, foreign relations, defense.”

So basically, all the complex systems that exist in any country? This is so vague it becomes meaningless. Economic instability and foreign policy shifts happen in every nation due to a thousand causes, not just ideology. Pinning it all on Marxist infiltration is like blaming every storm on sorcery.

7. “Next is crisis—6 weeks to bring a nation to the edge.”

Crisis is part of political life. Pandemics, wars, economic collapses, they happen under every ideology. Suggesting that crisis is an orchestrated outcome of Marxist subversion is laughable unless you think hurricanes are planned.

8. “Normalization follows a violent change of power and structure.”

Sure, sometimes revolutions lead to oppressive regimes, but often “normalization” just means recovery from chaos, not domination by shadowy Marxists. Also, weird that he cites Brezhnev’s tanks but doesn’t mention U.S. coups, assassinations, or regime change operations. Selective outrage much?

9. “The problem is a lack of moral standards.”

The tired “moral decay” argument. But whose morals? Puritans? Libertarians? Liberation theologians? Human rights activists? The “moral standards” argument is often just code for “the world doesn’t look how I want it to.” It’s nostalgia dressed up as diagnosis.

10. “Big Brother government will eliminate the free market.”

The irony here is that corporate monopolies are far more effective at stifling free market competition than any leftist policy proposal. Again, oversimplifying doesn’t lead to clarity; it leads to scapegoats.

Final Note: “This is REAL HISTORY.”

It’s one man’s Cold War perspective, not sacred truth. Yes, it’s a version of history, steeped in defector trauma and filtered through western media anxieties, but the claim that we’re “living in the result of this” is not analysis. That's just alarmism. Real history is complex, messy, and often self-contradictory. Don’t mistake rhetoric for revelation.

Conclusion

Is propaganda real? Absolutely. Is psychological manipulation used in geopolitics? Without question, but Bezmenov’s monologue, while interesting as a historical artifact, is not a master key to understanding modern society. It’s a relic of a frightened time, being resurrected to scare people again. The antidote isn’t to swing to the other extreme. It’s to think better, read wider, and refuse to let fear pass for clarity.
 
15th post
Take a look at the election results, and the internal war going on in your party: stupid partisons who can't read the tea leaves are a problem for the party.

That means you.
You’re continuing to prove my point. I asked for facts, policies, substance. You replied with a vague reference to “election results” and then pivoted back to name-calling and vague tribalism. You didn’t cite a single source. You didn’t reference a single bill, policy, platform, or piece of legislation. You didn’t engage with any of the points I raised. Instead, you just repeated the same tired blame game, treating disagreement as disloyalty and complexity as betrayal.

If you want to have a serious conversation about what’s actually happening, policy outcomes, social trends, political shifts, I’m all ears, but if the extent of your argument is “you’re the problem” without any substance behind it, then all you're doing is proving that you don’t have a real argument. If your position has substance, back it up. Otherwise, you're just proving that your entire view is about resentment, not reality.
 
I’ve seen this Bezmenov interview pop up before, and as always, it’s being wielded like a sledgehammer where a scalpel is needed. Let’s dissect it point by point, not to dismiss concerns about manipulation, propaganda, or societal decay, but to think clearly without falling for Cold War ghosts that are still haunting us 40 years later.

1. “Ideological subversion is overt… you can see it with your own eyes.”

This opening conflates “what you see” with what’s true, skipping the real issue: interpretation. All propaganda, left, right, or otherwise, thrives not because it's visible, but because it's emotionally satisfying to certain narratives. What Bezmenov offers isn’t objectivity; it’s a script designed to validate Cold War paranoia. Seeing something doesn’t mean you understand it.

2. “Only 15% of KGB effort is espionage. 85% is psychological warfare.”

The number sounds authoritative but is unverifiable. It's designed to shock, not inform. Most intelligence agencies don’t publish a pie chart of their secret budgets. The point? This “85%” line isn’t insight; it’s salesmanship, meant to inflate Bezmenov’s personal importance.

3. “Demoralization takes 15-20 years, enough to educate one generation.”

So one whole generation is hopelessly brainwashed? That assumes education is monolithic and top-down. In reality, people grow up under diverse influences, families, communities, religions, countercultures, books, and now the internet. The claim that a generation has been “successfully demoralized” is simplistic and, frankly, nonsense.

4. “Marxism/Leninism is being pumped into students’ heads…”

First off, if that’s true, it’s a colossal failure, since the U.S. is still overwhelmingly capitalist. What’s really going on is some educators challenge American exceptionalism, talk about systemic issues, and teach critical thinking. That’s not Marxism; it’s adulthood, and often it makes people more thoughtful, not less patriotic.

5. “Even if you show proof to a demoralized person, they won’t believe it.”

This is the classic unfalsifiable claim. It’s rhetorical insurance. If you disagree with him, it proves you’re brainwashed. It's circular logic, a “heads I win, tails you lose” setup. Real argument requires the possibility of disproof.

6. “Destabilization takes 2-5 years: focus on economy, foreign relations, defense.”

So basically, all the complex systems that exist in any country? This is so vague it becomes meaningless. Economic instability and foreign policy shifts happen in every nation due to a thousand causes, not just ideology. Pinning it all on Marxist infiltration is like blaming every storm on sorcery.

7. “Next is crisis—6 weeks to bring a nation to the edge.”

Crisis is part of political life. Pandemics, wars, economic collapses, they happen under every ideology. Suggesting that crisis is an orchestrated outcome of Marxist subversion is laughable unless you think hurricanes are planned.

8. “Normalization follows a violent change of power and structure.”

Sure, sometimes revolutions lead to oppressive regimes, but often “normalization” just means recovery from chaos, not domination by shadowy Marxists. Also, weird that he cites Brezhnev’s tanks but doesn’t mention U.S. coups, assassinations, or regime change operations. Selective outrage much?

9. “The problem is a lack of moral standards.”

The tired “moral decay” argument. But whose morals? Puritans? Libertarians? Liberation theologians? Human rights activists? The “moral standards” argument is often just code for “the world doesn’t look how I want it to.” It’s nostalgia dressed up as diagnosis.

10. “Big Brother government will eliminate the free market.”

The irony here is that corporate monopolies are far more effective at stifling free market competition than any leftist policy proposal. Again, oversimplifying doesn’t lead to clarity; it leads to scapegoats.

Final Note: “This is REAL HISTORY.”

It’s one man’s Cold War perspective, not sacred truth. Yes, it’s a version of history, steeped in defector trauma and filtered through western media anxieties, but the claim that we’re “living in the result of this” is not analysis. That's just alarmism. Real history is complex, messy, and often self-contradictory. Don’t mistake rhetoric for revelation.

Conclusion

Is propaganda real? Absolutely. Is psychological manipulation used in geopolitics? Without question, but Bezmenov’s monologue, while interesting as a historical artifact, is not a master key to understanding modern society. It’s a relic of a frightened time, being resurrected to scare people again. The antidote isn’t to swing to the other extreme. It’s to think better, read wider, and refuse to let fear pass for clarity.
I'll give you an "A" for effort, but if you spin any harder you'll create a black hole.
Enjoy your "reality", and keep those blinders firmly in place.
 
I'll give you an "A" for effort, but if you spin any harder you'll create a black hole.
Enjoy your "reality", and keep those blinders firmly in place.
No actual arguments in this post.
 
Last edited:
No actual arguments in this post.
A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he’s going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crushes his balls, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.
:itsok:
 
Back
Top Bottom