Well now.....A 45 second lecture destroying the global warming argument.

[Crick]

Detroit District

www.lre.usace.army.mil

Well if they are connected, your entire point of miami is a lie.

At least the Great Lakes water one can drink!!! 21% of the earth's freshwater.

Did you not read your own headline? "Below recent years record high levels". Are you suffering some sort of neurological deterioration?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Did you not read your own headline? "Below recent years record high levels". Are you suffering some sort of neurological deterioration?

"Below recent years record high levels".

Why would it be below? Did it get colder? CO2 levels drop?

 

[Crick]

"Below recent years record high levels".

Why would it be below? Did it get colder? CO2 levels drop?

Do you also want to argue that sea levels aren't rising?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you also want to argue that sea levels aren't rising?

Do I?

 

[Crick]

Do I?

Do you?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you?

Should I?

 

[Crick]

Should I?

Forget it Todd.

 

[otto105]

Sure it did. It showed the hide the decline ploy. And, with Mann not providing his data per court order is more evidence it is a shell game. hide the decline.

The emails did nothing to disprove AGW.

It's hilarious that you think they do.

 

[jc456]

The emails did nothing to disprove AGW.

It's hilarious that you think they do.

I disagree

 

[otto105]

I disagree

Yeah, a denier would just to reach around to get a good feel of themselves.

'Climategate' - FactCheck.org.

 

[jc456]

Yeah, a denier would just to reach around to get a good feel of themselves.

'Climategate' - FactCheck.org.

It wouldn’t have been news! I stand

 

[otto105]

And 10 years later you're still just a stupid denier coping a feel of yourself.


Climategate 10 years on: what lessons have we learned?

 

[otto105]

The denier position that no scientific organization on the planet would entertain or agree with.

 

[jc456]

Did you not read your own headline? "Below recent years record high levels". Are you suffering some sort of neurological deterioration?

Yep down

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The emails did nothing to disprove AGW.

It's hilarious that you think they do.

They did show that Nobel Prize winner Michael Mann was a piece of shit.

 

[sparky]

explain your issue with the video?

censoring.....

~S~

 

[jc456]

They did show that Nobel Prize winner Michael Mann was a piece of shit.

He gave credit to climategate by not giving up his data

 

[otto105]

They did show that Nobel Prize winner Michael Mann was a piece of shit.

No, they showed that he was correct.

Denialism is the shit in your space.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No, they showed that he was correct.

Denialism is the shit in your space.

Why did he want to hide the decline?
It makes him sound dishonest.

 

[Dagosa]

45 second lecture destroying the global warming argument. - AR15.COM

Firearm Discussion and Resources from AR-15, AK-47, Handguns and more! Buy, Sell, and Trade your Firearms and Gear.

www.ar15.com

Sadly, not an effective argument because the people that need to hear it would rather believe that the banks and realtors are lying to them instead of the media, climate change weenies, and politicians lying to them.

It's a older vid but I've never heard or read of a rebuttal to it either.

Gee, I was hoping for the, “if the good guys who believe in AGW we’re more heavily armed, we could scare the fk out of less armed deniers into burning fewer fossil fuels “ argument.

Where most gun owners want more firearm regulations, you’d think most gun owners would want more regulations on CO2 emissions.