ChrisL
Diamond Member
I think the fact that she is setting up college funds for her children so that they can have a better life than she did shows that she is a caring mother though.
I hope the best for her and her kids.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn't commenting upon the child. I was attempting to comment on the absurdity of the OP. It reflects a dislike of the poor in general, but then the result of the win on the lottery is that the woman is no longer "a taker," but is paying income tax. Ironic, imo.hey, she finally had to pay income tax. Light a cigar and be happy!
Agreed, but this is a woman who did have two jobs at one time. I imagine that is very difficult when you have a child with severe disabilities, like cerebral palsy. We just need to accept the fact that some people have no heart.
You know.....she has 100 million dollars but her child still has cerebral palsy
Do you think she would give it up for a healthy child?
You mean give up the money? I can't say as I don't know this person. That would be total speculation on my part. She probably loves THIS child though. I would give up the money to CURE my child of the disease though . . . for the good of the child, to be able to run and play and have a normal life. Gosh, it must be so difficult to deal with, not only financially but on a deep emotional level, to see your child suffer and not be able to play and run like the other kids.Really sad.
I wasn't commenting upon the child. I was attempting to comment on the absurdity of the OP. It reflects a dislike of the poor in general, but then the result of the win on the lottery is that the woman is no longer "a taker," but is paying income tax. Ironic, imo.hey, she finally had to pay income tax. Light a cigar and be happy!
Agreed, but this is a woman who did have two jobs at one time. I imagine that is very difficult when you have a child with severe disabilities, like cerebral palsy. We just need to accept the fact that some people have no heart.
You know.....she has 100 million dollars but her child still has cerebral palsy
Do you think she would give it up for a healthy child?
You mean give up the money? I can't say as I don't know this person. That would be total speculation on my part. She probably loves THIS child though. I would give up the money to CURE my child of the disease though . . . for the good of the child, to be able to run and play and have a normal life. Gosh, it must be so difficult to deal with, not only financially but on a deep emotional level, to see your child suffer and not be able to play and run like the other kids.Really sad.
You know.....she has 100 million dollars but her child still has cerebral palsy
Do you think she would give it up for a healthy child?
She is now ridiculously wealthy but she still has a child with a severe disability to deal with. She can now afford better doctors and better treatments but cerebral palsy is still tough to deal with
I wasn't commenting upon the child. I was attempting to comment on the absurdity of the OP. It reflects a dislike of the poor in general, but then the result of the win on the lottery is that the woman is no longer "a taker," but is paying income tax. Ironic, imo.hey, she finally had to pay income tax. Light a cigar and be happy!
Agreed, but this is a woman who did have two jobs at one time. I imagine that is very difficult when you have a child with severe disabilities, like cerebral palsy. We just need to accept the fact that some people have no heart.
You know.....she has 100 million dollars but her child still has cerebral palsy
Do you think she would give it up for a healthy child?
You mean give up the money? I can't say as I don't know this person. That would be total speculation on my part. She probably loves THIS child though. I would give up the money to CURE my child of the disease though . . . for the good of the child, to be able to run and play and have a normal life. Gosh, it must be so difficult to deal with, not only financially but on a deep emotional level, to see your child suffer and not be able to play and run like the other kids.Really sad.
That is my impression of the right, in general; all we really need to solve simple poverty in the US, is merely a moral of "goodwill toward men".
I think the fact that she is setting up college funds for her children so that they can have a better life than she did shows that she is a caring mother though.I hope the best for her and her kids.
She is now ridiculously wealthy but she still has a child with a severe disability to deal with. She can now afford better doctors and better treatments but cerebral palsy is still tough to deal with
You still haven't given us any evidence that she has a disabled kid. Why won't you do that.?
Yes, almost as if they want her to remain on welfare, so they can punish her and complain about her.God forbid, the miserable people not have something to complain about.
She is now ridiculously wealthy but she still has a child with a severe disability to deal with. She can now afford better doctors and better treatments but cerebral palsy is still tough to deal with
You still haven't given us any evidence that she has a disabled kid. Why won't you do that.?
Sorry Speedo
I ain't playing. Try someone else
I didn't know I was acting that way. To be clear, I think lotteries are bad things. For good causes, but generally I prefer progressive, rather than regressive taxes, to fund stuff like education. But a majority of citizens disagree, so we have folks on welfare playing powerball. Color me ... unsurprised that less affluent less educated people play lotteries. Rich folks prefer gambling on equities and bonds. I didn't vote for the lottery and don't really give a rat's azz who wins. I find speeder's illogic disconnects amusing.I wasn't commenting upon the child. I was attempting to comment on the absurdity of the OP. It reflects a dislike of the poor in general, but then the result of the win on the lottery is that the woman is no longer "a taker," but is paying income tax. Ironic, imo.hey, she finally had to pay income tax. Light a cigar and be happy!
Agreed, but this is a woman who did have two jobs at one time. I imagine that is very difficult when you have a child with severe disabilities, like cerebral palsy. We just need to accept the fact that some people have no heart.
You know.....she has 100 million dollars but her child still has cerebral palsy
Do you think she would give it up for a healthy child?
You mean give up the money? I can't say as I don't know this person. That would be total speculation on my part. She probably loves THIS child though. I would give up the money to CURE my child of the disease though . . . for the good of the child, to be able to run and play and have a normal life. Gosh, it must be so difficult to deal with, not only financially but on a deep emotional level, to see your child suffer and not be able to play and run like the other kids.Really sad.
Why do you keep acting like this one woman winning the lottery and paying taxes makes up for the millions who play and lose? She doesn't
sorry dude, you need some better clues and a real Cause; simply Using capitalism through lotteries has already created one person of wealth.That is my impression of the right, in general; all we really need to solve simple poverty in the US, is merely a moral of "goodwill toward men".
HAHAHA. What a ridiculous thing to say. You silly wooly-brained libs are hilarious. The way to end poverty is to stop poor people from having kids. Any women accepting welfare for her kids must agree to sterilization. THINK
What the fuck is the matter with you?I don't condemn people on welfare buying a lottery ticket anymore than I condemn them for buying an ice cream cone or going to see a movie
which they shouldnt be doing either.
For fuck's sakes, what is wrong with you? WE , those of us who pay taxes anyway , are FEEDING them because they claim they can't afford to do it themselves. Maybe they COULD afford to if they wouldn't go spend $50 at the movie theater.
Poor people do not deserve to be punished for their poverty. They don't need rightwing poverty police monitoring every penny they spend. If they want to have some enjoyment in life, they don't need assholes like you insisting they eat gruel and wear hand me downs
What the fuck is the matter with you?I don't condemn people on welfare buying a lottery ticket anymore than I condemn them for buying an ice cream cone or going to see a movie
which they shouldnt be doing either.
For fuck's sakes, what is wrong with you? WE , those of us who pay taxes anyway , are FEEDING them because they claim they can't afford to do it themselves. Maybe they COULD afford to if they wouldn't go spend $50 at the movie theater.
Poor people do not deserve to be punished for their poverty. They don't need rightwing poverty police monitoring every penny they spend. If they want to have some enjoyment in life, they don't need assholes like you insisting they eat gruel and wear hand me downs
Plus, once they've won the lottery, that's one less person on welfare.
What the fuck is the matter with you?I don't condemn people on welfare buying a lottery ticket anymore than I condemn them for buying an ice cream cone or going to see a movie
which they shouldnt be doing either.
For fuck's sakes, what is wrong with you? WE , those of us who pay taxes anyway , are FEEDING them because they claim they can't afford to do it themselves. Maybe they COULD afford to if they wouldn't go spend $50 at the movie theater.
Poor people do not deserve to be punished for their poverty. They don't need rightwing poverty police monitoring every penny they spend. If they want to have some enjoyment in life, they don't need assholes like you insisting they eat gruel and wear hand me downs
Plus, once they've won the lottery, that's one less person on welfare.
yeah right
1M Lottery Winner Who Continued to Collect Food Stamps Dies of Possible Overdose Video TheBlaze.com
Before venturing an opinion re: this individual I would need to know what kind of person she is. It would be nice to know she has a charitable nature and is spreading her good fortune around.And she could be provided for as a caregiver. She could be on disability. She could be getting child support. She could be living in a household where they value her being home more than they value her income.
Unless you have some information that actually states that she is on gov't assistance, you have no argument. THINK.
I bought a $35 ticket in the Australian Lottery every year at Christmas time. After about 20 years I realized just how little chance I had of winning, and what better use I could put that (collective $750) money to, so when they increased the price of the bottom level ticket to $40 I quit.Cheap people don't buy lottery tickets.