Wear a Mask in Public or Give Your Godvernment $500

[meaner gene]

If you have on a mask, why do you care I don’t?

The easiest answer is because if you have a mask on, it reduces the chance of spreading the coronavirus by 95%

 

[wamose]

So put on a mask...not a big deal. All private businesses here require a mask and there's no mandate stating as such.

View attachment 361767

No, no, you got it all wrong. The mask does not protect YOU, it protects other people.

The box was never meant to protect you and you alone.

Well, your wrong on two fronts. The mask doesn't protect you OR the other person.

But you should learn to do things right and not wear the box. It really exposes you to people's ridicule.

Can you blow out a candle from two feet away while wearing a mask? Distancing, six feet. Put your fucking mask on.

Can you even understand that masks don't work because we are not blowing out candles here? The same air that is breathed out without a mask is the same air that is breathed out with a mask. Before you fucking clowns started "asking" us to wear masks, no one coughed or sneezed on others unless they were deliberately doing so. That kind of behavior was frown on and in come cases, were considered criminal.

But if a person is breathing and you walk through the same space they just occupied, you're breathing the same air. Mask or no mask.

Masks do NOT fucking work.

So, you stop asking Me and I'll stop punching your face bloody.

But if a person is breathing and you walk through the same space they just occupied, you're breathing the same air. Mask or no mask.

Thus, the six foot distancing. The limiting of the number of people within an area.

Hence, the masks don't work. I can walk around any store and if you don't want to catch what I'm carrying, you walk a different way.

You see, its all on you. If people not wearing masks scare you, then stay the fuck home. Problem solved.

Enforce actions on things YOU can control. When you try to control Me, bad things are going to happen to you.

So what do you recommend?

What was recommended before this became political.

We have identified those who are at risk and stand a good chance of being severely affected by this virus, or even killed by it.

We isolate those people. We all have elderly that are at risk. We isolate them and care for them during this crisis until we reach a point where the majority of the population becomes a nonfactor in transmitting the disease. That is called "herd immunity". We already know that those who are naturally immune or who have contracted the virus are very likely to not transmit to anyone.

So, you do the shopping for the elderly, ensure that the provisions are cleaned and not a threat and if need be, provide money to them to keep them entertained. Vist them but maintain the social distancing recommended.

For those who are not elderly, but fall into the 'at risk' category because of their health, you isolate them and provide them with assurances that they won't lose their jobs for being isolated. You pass a law that makes it a crime for a company to fire someone who is at risk and isolated for their own life/health.

The rest of you people go back to work. If you get the virus, it is very likely that you won't even know beyond a sniffle or two. If you do get pretty sick, then follow recommendations of your local health authorities in-home treatment.

Whatever you do, do NOT let them put you on a ventilator. Those machines kill.

Fine people who act like Nazi's and report others who don't follow their idea of what should be done.

Open the Fucking country up and get back to work!

Open the Fucking country up and get back to work!

That's what the Republicans did in Arizona, Texas, and Florida. Look what happened.

Yes, looting, rioting burning thugs got together and spread the virus.

Amen. The spike correlates with the protests, not the openings which happen a month earlier.

 

[LuckyDuck]

So put on a mask...not a big deal. All private businesses here require a mask and there's no mandate stating as such.

Hell, make wearing a mask, profitable. You could rob a bank, rob a convenience store, rob pedestrians and rob BLM members, giving them something else to complain about.

 

[meaner gene]

Amen. The spike correlates with the protests, not the openings which happen a month earlier.

I ran a fact check on Texas. The Floyd protests started on May 26th. Texas opened up by George Abbott around June 23rd.

coronavirus cases in the usa by state - Google Search

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

I got my "RECALL WHITMER" mask so I might as well make the best of it

 

[jc456]

The easiest answer is because if you have a mask on, it reduces the chance of spreading the coronavirus by 95%

How and to whom? You got a mask on?

that isn’t logical since you say masks protect

 

[jc456]

Amen. The spike correlates with the protests, not the openings which happen a month earlier.

I ran a fact check on Texas. The Floyd protests started on May 26th. Texas opened up by George Abbott around June 23rd.

coronavirus cases in the usa by state - Google Search

Then what are you worrying about? Seems your facts suggest socializing doesn’t spread it! Thanks

 

[meaner gene]

The easiest answer is because if you have a mask on, it reduces the chance of spreading the coronavirus by 95%

How and to whom? You got a mask on?

that isn’t logical since you say masks protect

 

[meaner gene]

Then what are you worrying about? Seems your facts suggest socializing doesn’t spread it! Thanks

The graph shows that the protests did not cause any significant increase in coronavirus cases. The reopening of the states did, and continue to drive the numbers exponentially higher.

 

[ranfunck]

This could be coming to you.

Masks are gone Orange County C A,,

The Healthy American Peggy Hall @ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwC7VpIHS2uJzJ0q5I11oQA

153news.net

 

[Papageorgio]

If you infect one person, the social cost will be higher than that. So I guess $500 is a bargain rate.

The social cost?

Infecting one person leads to others getting infected, such as the person's immediate family. It can result in tens of thousnds of dollar in co-pays. It can lead to children losing parents, and so on.

Doesnt the flu do the same? So maybe we should protect people from the cost of social loss. The social cost of driving is awfully high, we should ban driving. Lots of people drown, let’s stop swimming. Add to that people that smoke, overeat, drink, we ban all of that then the social cost would drop considerably, wouldn’t it?

 

[Papageorgio]

Then what are you worrying about? Seems your facts suggest socializing doesn’t spread it! Thanks

The graph shows that the protests did not cause any significant increase in coronavirus cases. The reopening of the states did, and continue to drive the numbers exponentially higher.

So rioting is okay, going swimming is bad. Got it.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Then what are you worrying about? Seems your facts suggest socializing doesn’t spread it! Thanks

The graph shows that the protests did not cause any significant increase in coronavirus cases. The reopening of the states did, and continue to drive the numbers exponentially higher.

Riiiiiiight.

 

[Agit8r]

If you infect one person, the social cost will be higher than that. So I guess $500 is a bargain rate.

The social cost?

Infecting one person leads to others getting infected, such as the person's immediate family. It can result in tens of thousnds of dollar in co-pays. It can lead to children losing parents, and so on.

Doesnt the flu do the same? So maybe we should protect people from the cost of social loss. The social cost of driving is awfully high, we should ban driving. Lots of people drown, let’s stop swimming. Add to that people that smoke, overeat, drink, we ban all of that then the social cost would drop considerably, wouldn’t it?

Swimming is banned in certain locations. There are speed limits. We are expected to wear clothing in public. There are many social expectations that are enforced by laws and regulations. This is one that happens to affect others more than it affects the wearer.

 

[meaner gene]

Doesnt the flu do the same? So maybe we should protect people from the cost of social loss. The social cost of driving is awfully high, we should ban driving. Lots of people drown, let’s stop swimming. Add to that people that smoke, overeat, drink, we ban all of that then the social cost would drop considerably, wouldn’t it?

We ban suicide. But that doesn't stop people.

Historically, various states listed the act as a felony, but all were reluctant to ... suicide a crime (North and South Dakota, Washington, New Jersey, Nevada, and ...

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

If you infect one person, the social cost will be higher than that. So I guess $500 is a bargain rate.

The social cost?

Infecting one person leads to others getting infected, such as the person's immediate family. It can result in tens of thousnds of dollar in co-pays. It can lead to children losing parents, and so on.

Doesnt the flu do the same? So maybe we should protect people from the cost of social loss. The social cost of driving is awfully high, we should ban driving. Lots of people drown, let’s stop swimming. Add to that people that smoke, overeat, drink, we ban all of that then the social cost would drop considerably, wouldn’t it?

Swimming is banned in certain locations. There are speed limits. We are expected to wear clothing in public. There are many social expectations that are enforced by laws and regulations. This is one that happens to affect others more than it affects the wearer.

You lost all credibility when you excused "protesters" and when we saw our governors marching shoulder to shoulder with the rabble while giving iut $1,000 tickets to church goers sitting in their own cars.

Have you seen the Walmart parking lot? Sorry, but this whole "pandemic" is POLITICAL.

 

[meaner gene]

Then what are you worrying about? Seems your facts suggest socializing doesn’t spread it! Thanks

The graph shows that the protests did not cause any significant increase in coronavirus cases. The reopening of the states did, and continue to drive the numbers exponentially higher.

Riiiiiiight.

I can only post the facts. Apparently most of the protesters wore masks. And to the detriment of the OP, that also proves that wearing masks works.

 

[meaner gene]

You lost all credibility when you excused "protesters" and when we saw our governors marching shoulder to shoulder with the rabble while giving iut $1,000 tickets to church goers sitting in their own cars.

Mississippi churchgoers fined $500 for attending drive-in service

Churchgoers who attended a drive-in service at a church in Greenville, Mississippi, were fined $500 for reportedly violating a curfew order from the mayor.

You left out they were breaking a curfew. Which is the same reason Trump send in the police, and federal troops with tear gas to remove peaceful protesters from Lafayette park.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Doesnt the flu do the same?

Didn't think i would hear someone compare it to the flu again. Apparently there is one in every crowd...

 

[Papageorgio]

You lost all credibility when you excused "protesters" and when we saw our governors marching shoulder to shoulder with the rabble while giving iut $1,000 tickets to church goers sitting in their own cars.

Mississippi churchgoers fined $500 for attending drive-in service

Churchgoers who attended a drive-in service at a church in Greenville, Mississippi, were fined $500 for reportedly violating a curfew order from the mayor.

You left out they were breaking a curfew. Which is the same reason Trump send in the police, and federal troops with tear gas to remove peaceful protesters from Lafayette park.

Isn’t that the church where the mayor looked like an asshole for trying to violate their Constitutional rights and he cancelled the fines and changed his order because the DOJ came down on him? Great mayor, I bet you’d vote for someone like him.

As far as the peaceful protest, that was wrong as well. However the left supports one and not the other. I guess some feel the Constitution is good for one group and not the other.