What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Weaponizing The Media

OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
109,220
Reaction score
44,011
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Well....they own it.
Might as well label it the "Ministry of Truth".....it's simply a clutch of Democrats with press passes.


1. "I think it’s become clear that fairness is overrated ... the idea that we should always give two sides equal weight and merit does not reflect the world we find ourselves in," Holt said on Tuesday night while accepting an award at the 45th Murrow Symposium. "That the sun sets in the west is a fact. Any contrary view does not deserve our time or attention," Holt continued. "Decisions to not give unsupported arguments equal time are not a dereliction of journalistic responsibility or some kind of agenda, in fact, it’s just the opposite." NBC's Lester Holt says we don’t need to hear both sides to define truth: ‘Fairness is overrated’




2.

3. Fake Stories that needed fact checkers: Three years of Russian Collusion stories; altering documents at the DoJ and FBI to railroad political opponents; the state media burying the Hunter Biden Scandal what with Joe getting 10% of the bribes; stories about Kavanaugh rape parties, and Covington Catholic School; Carter Page working for Russia when he was actually working for the CIA….where were those ‘fact checkers’?


View attachment 485262



4. If Democrat voters only read.....they might remember Winston Smith, lead character in 1984....
Winston Smith works in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, where his job is to rewrite historical documents so they match the constantly changing current party line.
.





'If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed.'
What you're saying is that lies are the same as truths and that evidence is unimportant. Why am I not at all surprised?


"What you're saying is that lies are the same as truths and that evidence is unimportant."


In what quote of mine did I say that?

And, once again we find Democrats lie about everything.
"That the sun sets in the west is a fact. Any contrary view does not deserve our time or attention," Holt continued. "Decisions to not give unsupported arguments equal time are not a dereliction of journalistic responsibility or some kind of agenda, in fact, it’s just the opposite."

The line above is from your post. Do you agree with Mr. Holt? That is not what I took away, ergo, you equated a lie with truth and the fact no evidence was put forward did not distress you. Please explain if I misunderstood you.



Quite a diaphanous lie you are telling, liar.


You know very well that the rising and setting of the sun are not the fodder of the state media.


This is:
First collusion, collusion, collusion, Russia, Russia, Russia, Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction. Racist, Racist, Racist, Impeach, Impeach, Impeach, Recession, Recession, Recession, Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the Kavanaugh hoax, the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’ General Flynn perjury trap, no evidence of voter fraud in the stolen election.....

Don’t forget the Democrats told you that Trump was colluding with Russia…and that wasn’t true. They also told you that so was Naval Academy grad Carter Page and so was George Papadopoulos and so was General Michael Flynn, a three star general and former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency….and all of that was a lie.

How stupid must one be to keep believing what they say?



...and, AOC lying about her near-death experience in the Capitol Riots.....when she wasn't even in the Capitol.

And that Biden voters as agents provocateur weren't behind the Capitol Riot.....and that Pelosi knew and refused to allow extra security. They lie about everything.......yet here you are, ready to swallow the next lie.

FakeStories: Three years of Russian Collusion stories; altering documents at the DoJ and FBI to railroad political opponents; the state media burying the Hunter Biden Scandal what with Joe getting 10% of the bribes; stories about Kavanaugh rape parties, and Covington Catholic School; Carter Page working for Russia when he was actually working for the CIA….where were those ‘fact checkers’?




This particular poster is instructive as stereotypically representative of every Biden voter: scummy low-life liars.
You are certainly a expert on lies since you practice so often. I'll take your bolded line: General Flynn perjury trap

There’s a problem with that. Every single person claiming that Flynn was coerced to lie by the FBI — which necessarily concedes he did lie — is also accusing Flynn of perjuring himself in a recent sworn statement before Judge Emmet Sullivan. If what they say is true, then Flynn committed a crime in January, one for which the statute of limitations will extend until 2025.

Flynn committed perjury, plain an simple. If the FBI offered to buy heroin from Flynn and Flynn had a suitcase full of it, is that a trap too?



You can't stop fabricating, huh?

Seems related to the same frequency of voting Democrat.



"The recent litigation over the dismissal of the prosecution against General Flynn underscores the need for citizens to be wary of the “perjury trap.” Former Bush Administration advisor Scooter Libby, Presidents Clinton and Nixon, television mogul Martha Stewart, and others have also fallen into a “perjury trap” over the years despite being innocent (or at least not readily proven guilty) of any substantive criminal offense."


"FBI Docs Reveal: “Flynn Was Not Lying or Did Not Think He Was Lying”

Apparent discrepancies within the 302 documents are being questioned by may former senior FBI officials, who state that there are stringent policies in place to ensure that the documents are guarded against tampering.

"despite being innocent"

Except every one of your examples was guilty of a criminal act.



And, as always, we find a Democrat supporter who lies with the same efforts breathing requires.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
109,220
Reaction score
44,011
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Well....they own it.
Might as well label it the "Ministry of Truth".....it's simply a clutch of Democrats with press passes.


1. "I think it’s become clear that fairness is overrated ... the idea that we should always give two sides equal weight and merit does not reflect the world we find ourselves in," Holt said on Tuesday night while accepting an award at the 45th Murrow Symposium. "That the sun sets in the west is a fact. Any contrary view does not deserve our time or attention," Holt continued. "Decisions to not give unsupported arguments equal time are not a dereliction of journalistic responsibility or some kind of agenda, in fact, it’s just the opposite." NBC's Lester Holt says we don’t need to hear both sides to define truth: ‘Fairness is overrated’




2.

3. Fake Stories that needed fact checkers: Three years of Russian Collusion stories; altering documents at the DoJ and FBI to railroad political opponents; the state media burying the Hunter Biden Scandal what with Joe getting 10% of the bribes; stories about Kavanaugh rape parties, and Covington Catholic School; Carter Page working for Russia when he was actually working for the CIA….where were those ‘fact checkers’?


View attachment 485262



4. If Democrat voters only read.....they might remember Winston Smith, lead character in 1984....
Winston Smith works in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, where his job is to rewrite historical documents so they match the constantly changing current party line.
.





'If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed.'

Yes, that last quotation is very true.

Some people really believe that it is silly to present both sides.

They believe, with Mr. Holt, that the media should present the "correct" side.

The problem, of course, is what is the "correct" side?

Big Tech decided that the 2020 election was as pure as the driven snow. So they forbade any discussion to the contrary. They even banned a sitting President.

Big Tech decided that they were "correct."

Sadly, we may never know if they were or not.



Essentially, it is what I have always said about Democrat voters.....they are fine with allowing others to think for them.


Sounds a lot like what Tocqueville wrote about two hundred years ago....

Alexis de Tocqueville, writing “Democracy in America” in the 1830’s, described “an immense, tutelary power, which takes sole charge of assuring their enjoyment and of watching over their fate.” As he predicted, this power is “absolute, attentive to detail, regular, provident, and gentle,” and it “works willingly for their happiness, but it wishes to be the only agent and the sole arbiter of that happiness. It provides for their security, foresees and supplies their needs, guides them in their principal affairs, directs their industry, regulates their testaments, divides their inheritances.” It is entirely proper to ask, as he asked, whether it can “relieve them entirely of the trouble of thinking and of the effort associated with living.”
 

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
477
Points
140
" Contending With Hostile Persuasions In Courts Of Public Opinion "

* Funding Available Outlets And Capturing Viewer Audience Subscriptions *

Well....they own it.
Might as well label it the "Ministry of Truth".....it's simply a clutch of Democrats with press passes.
...
'If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed.'
" You may beat the crime , but you can not beat the charge . " explains a long standing means of harassment by legal and political systems .

Recourse to civil suit against slander or libel by offices of political figures , or by political figures , against public opinion , or even against disreputable behavior by legal systems is not likely to begin any time soon .
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
109,220
Reaction score
44,011
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
" Contending With Hostile Persuasions In Courts Of Public Opinion "

* Funding Available Outlets And Capturing Viewer Audience Subscriptions *

Well....they own it.
Might as well label it the "Ministry of Truth".....it's simply a clutch of Democrats with press passes.
...
'If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed.'
" You may beat the crime , but you can not beat the charge . " explains a long standing means of harassment by legal and political systems .

Recourse to civil suit against slander or libel by offices of political figures , or by political figures , against public opinion , or even against disreputable behavior by legal systems is not likely to begin any time soon .


It's the corrupting influence of power that Acton spoke of.
 

San Souci

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
3,060
Reaction score
2,471
Points
1,940
The way the media turned people against a good man like Donald Trump and propped up a sleazy career guy like Biden
is nothing short of astonishing.

This short interview sums it up perfectly, from last summer.


They took the time to prepare for it.....some 60 years.


  1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
  2. “The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
Yes. Bill Ayers ,Bernadine Dhorn ,and that black Murderess Angela Davis TEACH at Universities. Jerry Ruben ended up on Wall Street. Jane Fonda is a rich bitch. All those Hippie traitors are now our LEADERS.
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
109,220
Reaction score
44,011
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The way the media turned people against a good man like Donald Trump and propped up a sleazy career guy like Biden
is nothing short of astonishing.

This short interview sums it up perfectly, from last summer.


They took the time to prepare for it.....some 60 years.


  1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
  2. “The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs,S Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
Yes. Bill Ayers ,Bernadine Dhorn ,and that black Murderess Angela Davis TEACH at Universities. Jerry Ruben ended up on Wall Street. Jane Fonda is a rich bitch. All those Hippie traitors are now our LEADERS.


Did you see this?



Tulane University misidentified Hunter Biden’s expertise
Quin Hillyer 3 days ago
http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1g9Cm7?ocid=sf
https://twitter.com/share?url=http:...er=http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1g9Cm7?ocid=st
https://web.whatsapp.com/send?text=http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1g9Cm7?ocid=sw
The sickness unto death that infects modern universities is on full display in a course scheduled for this coming fall at Tulane University.

Somehow, Tulane thinks drug-addled, selfie-porn-video actor Hunter Biden is a fit lecturer for students interested in the interplay between media relations and policy.

At first glance, one would think this report surely is satire, perhaps something out of The Onion or the Babylon Bee. Alas, though, it is all too real.

One wonders what Biden knows about policymaking, since he has never been in a public policy position. Yes, he openly traded his name for pay from foreigners wanting to influence American policy, but that is not the same thing."
 

Attachments

  • 1619908986551.png
    1619908986551.png
    68 bytes · Views: 6

San Souci

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
3,060
Reaction score
2,471
Points
1,940
The way the media turned people against a good man like Donald Trump and propped up a sleazy career guy like Biden
is nothing short of astonishing.

This short interview sums it up perfectly, from last summer.


They took the time to prepare for it.....some 60 years.


  1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
  2. “The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs,S Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
Yes. Bill Ayers ,Bernadine Dhorn ,and that black Murderess Angela Davis TEACH at Universities. Jerry Ruben ended up on Wall Street. Jane Fonda is a rich bitch. All those Hippie traitors are now our LEADERS.


Did you see this?



Tulane University misidentified Hunter Biden’s expertise
Quin Hillyer 3 days ago
Tulane University misidentified Hunter Biden’s expertise
https://twitter.com/share?url=http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1g9Cm7?ocid=st&text=Tulane+University+misidentified+Hunter+Biden’s+expertise&original_referer=http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1g9Cm7?ocid=st
https://web.whatsapp.com/send?text=http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1g9Cm7?ocid=sw
The sickness unto death that infects modern universities is on full display in a course scheduled for this coming fall at Tulane University.

Somehow, Tulane thinks drug-addled, selfie-porn-video actor Hunter Biden is a fit lecturer for students interested in the interplay between media relations and policy.

At first glance, one would think this report surely is satire, perhaps something out of The Onion or the Babylon Bee. Alas, though, it is all too real.

One wonders what Biden knows about policymaking, since he has never been in a public policy position. Yes, he openly traded his name for pay from foreigners wanting to influence American policy, but that is not the same thing."
HB DoublePlusGood Duckspeaker----Or in "OldSpeak" ,Hunter Biden speaks with authority about things he knows nothing about
 
OP
PoliticalChic

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
109,220
Reaction score
44,011
Points
2,300
Location
Brooklyn, NY
The way the media turned people against a good man like Donald Trump and propped up a sleazy career guy like Biden
is nothing short of astonishing.

A quick walk down Memory Lane, as I speak; Obama was the one who "weaponized" the media. As well, as the IRS.





And yet, he was the one who spied on the media.



When Obama said he was going to ‘fundamentally transform’ America, he didn’t let on that he meant into East Germany and the Stasi.

"...the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the "shield and sword" of the party. ...Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs).... identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60.

"The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people," .... The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million."
Stasi

They had nothing on Hussein Obama.

He spied on the Senate Intelligence Committee, the NYTimes, the Associated Press, Fox News, CBS News, Sharyl Attkisson, James Risen, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, President Trump, Angela Merkle, on and on.



"FBI tells Americans to monitor family m
1626098537670.png
embers for signs of ‘extremism’ and snitch on them

The FBI has recently made posts on various social media, recommending that "family members and peers" turn people in to the FBI if they suspect them of "homegrown violent extremism".


1626098537546.png

 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top