Weaponization of the DOJ.

Congress has the authority and mandate to hold other branches of the government accountable....

The famous impeachments of presidents doesn't necessarily have to be just presidents.....it holds true for Prosecutors, Judges and all sorts of people doing naughty things....including their own membership.

Any federal judge can be impeached....
Any federal prosecutor can be impeached.
Any federal employee whether hired, appointed, or elected can be impeached by congress.
Unfortunately, impeachment is a toothless power rendered useless in the current hyper partisan environment.
 
But he is more honest than many we have had in the past. I'll give him that. Might not agree with everything he has done but he is more transparent and honest than others.
Kidding?
 
In your mind, no.

In the mind of voters, yes.

No jail sentences handed out for being Hitler I reckon.

:auiqs.jpg:
That’s not how the criminal justice system works.
 
I'll refer you to Janet Reno and Clinton....she claimed to be independent....but the reality was something completely different from that obviously....especially when talking points were repeated verbatim by her on several occasions after following direct orders from Bill as to what to do
Can you give me a concrete example?
 
It’s only wrong when the other side does it same old same old. The right is only upset when the left does it the left is only upset when right does as I have said before it’s the act so many have the issue with just who is doing it.
 
Unfortunately, impeachment is a toothless power rendered useless in the current hyper partisan environment.
As I pointed out earlier....
Congress is busy trading stocks.....like really really busy.
Or telling others how to trade stocks.

And....its amazing to me how a 9 year old little girl, granddaughter of a congressman is now a multimillionaire......but the congressman has not traded any stocks whatsoever.....
 
You loons make mockery of it.
Trump makes a mockery of it.

The voters didn’t vote on his guilt, nor did they ever hear the evidence as a jury would at trial. Claiming they vindicated him is nonsense.
 
Cutting 4,000 positions on DOJ.

Loss of over 10,000 lawyers and career professionals at DOJ who were fired, quite, resigned, or took retirement becasue of bad leadership and the destruction of the once proud DOJ.

Inability to fill remaining openings with qualified candidates because those that are qualified don't want anything to do with the current DOJ.

Lowering standards for hiring just to get some warm body into the positions they can fill.

Nominating incompetent leadership at the DOJ where loyalty was more important than the Constitution, the Law, and the application of justice.

Just a few "How did..." off the top of my head.

WW
We are far less likely to see these agencies get political again after these mass firings.
 
That's not an explanation of your position.
Theres PLENTY of history on these situations that are not exactly secret, debated, or denied by anyone.
Except you.....
 
We are far less likely to see these agencies get political again after these mass firings.

We are seeing a DOJ that is MUCH more political because the professionals have left, many that are in the jobs now are much less qualified and are there for loyalty to a man, not because of justice.

WW
 
We are seeing a DOJ that is MUCH more political
You had no issues when it was targeted at Trump and his allies. I also dont see novel legal theories being implemented now, though im not sure why. We should be as cutthroat as you all were.

We told you guys that you let the genie out of the bottle with all your lawfare, and now we are here. Dont whine about it now.
 
You had no issues when it was targeted at Trump and his allies. I also dont see novel legal theories being implemented now, though im not sure why. We should be as cutthroat as you all were.

We told you guys that you let the genie out of the bottle with all your lawfare, and now we are here. Dont whine about it now.
When you say “we are here”, what do you mean exactly by that?
 
15th post
You had no issues when it was targeted at Trump and his allies. I also dont see novel legal theories being implemented now, though im not sure why. We should be as cutthroat as you all were.

We told you guys that you let the genie out of the bottle with all your lawfare, and now we are here. Dont whine about it now.

You guys?

I'm an Anti-Trump Republican. I want my party back.

And Ya, Trump committed espionage - IMHO - getting the case dismissed on a "novel legal theory" that NO Special Counsel had ever had applied to them. Trump's espionage wasn't dismissed on the merits, on the merits he faced conviction on the fact. It got dismissed by a pet judge, hoping for an appointment as AG, Appeals Court, or even a Supreme Court position.

A "novel legal theory" directly in opposition to the United States Code.

WW

1781623728205.webp
 
We are seeing a DOJ that is MUCH more political because the professionals have left, many that are in the jobs now are much less qualified and are there for loyalty to a man, not because of justice.

WW
Well to be fair and honest about it all.....

It's the Judges that really matter.

Prosecutors today would have been disbarred for the crap they regularly pull today in most courtrooms. Even fellow prosecutors would prosecute the other lawyers from their own office in years past.

We have so many deliberately politically radicalized and activist judges.....it's a wonder we have a constitution at all.

We have lasted 250 years as a nation SAME CONSTITUTION.....longer than any other nation in existence in history.

Fixing our constitution or re-interpreting it in a new way is the WORST idea anyone ever has had.
 
We are far less likely to see these agencies get political again after these mass firings.
The mass firings were done for the purpose of maximizing the DoJ's politicization under trump.
 
We have so many deliberately politically radicalized and activist judges.....it's a wonder we have a constitution at all.
We have judges appointed by trump actually acting as sycophants and we have judges nominated by D prez's being accused of acting as trump's judges do........who are not.
 
Back
Top Bottom