We Were Wrong.....

The last time we played world police it cost us a trillion dollars and thousands of lives yet some people want more while also making the claim that we do not have enough money to feed our own. Want to link a re-invasion of Iraq to a tax hike equal to the cost? Didn't think so.

We sent a crystal-clear message to terrorists: don't mess with the US.

Guess what. It worked.

Guess what -- Iraq had squat to do with terrorism. All it did was piss people off. Which is not wise considering that's what terrorists are made of in the first place.


Not that you would care, cause we know you don't, but there was all sorts of evidence that Iraq and saddam had long ties to terrorism.

Like I said, for an asshole like you, who apparently liked saddam....you would not know about it.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=24

Evidence suggests that Saddam Hussein's Baathist Iraq was a haven for Islamic terrorists, including al Qaeda members and their affiliates. The evidence for Saddam's cooperation with, and support for, global terrorists is abundant. For example:

Journalist Stephen Hayes reported in July 2003 that the official Babylon Daily Political Newspaper, published by Saddam's eldest son, Uday, had printed what it called a "List of Honor" in its November 14, 2002 edition. This list gave the names and titles of 600 leading Iraqis, including this entry: "Abid Al-Karim Muhamed Aswod, intelligence officer responsible for the coordination of activities with the Osama bin Laden group at the Iraqi embassy in Pakistan." According to Hayes, that name matched that of Iraq's then-ambassador to Islamabad.

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, formerly the director of an al Qaeda training base in Afghanistan, fled to Iraq after being injured as the Taliban fell. He received medical care and convalesced for two months in Baghdad. He then opened a terrorist training camp in northern Iraq and arranged the October 2002 assassination of U.S. diplomat Lawrence Foley in Amman, Jordan.

Ramzi Yousef, the Kuwaiti-born ringleader of the February 26, 1993 World Trade Center bombing plot, first arrived in the United States (on September 1, 1992) on an Iraqi passport.

Author Richard Miniter reported on September 25, 2003, that U.S. forces had discovered a cache of documents in Tikrit, Saddam's hometown, showing that Iraq had given both a house and a monthly salary to al Qaeda member Abdul Rahman Yasin, who was indicted for mixing the chemicals in the bomb that exploded beneath the World Trade Center in 1993.

Along Iraq's border with Syria, U.S. troops captured Farouk Hijazi, Saddam's former ambassador to Turkey and suspected liaison to al Qaeda. Under interrogation, Hijazi admitted meeting with senior al Qaeda leaders at Saddam's behest in 1994.

While sifting through the bombed ruins of the Iraqi intelligence agency in April 2003, three investigators – the Toronto Star's Mitch Potter, the London Daily Telegraph's Inigo Gilmore, and their translator -- discovered a memo dated "February 19, 1998" and marked "Top Secret and Urgent." It said the agency would pay "all the travel and hotel expenses inside Iraq to gain the knowledge of the message from bin Laden and to convey to his envoy an oral message from us to bin Laden, the Saudi opposition leader, about the future of our relationship with him, and to achieve a direct meeting with him."

On January 5, 2000, Ahmad Hikmat Shakir — an Iraqi airport greeter reportedly dispatched from Baghdad's embassy in Malaysia — welcomed Khalid al Midhar and Nawaz al Hamzi to Kuala Lampur and escorted them to a local hotel where these September 11 hijackers met with 9/11 conspirators Ramzi bin al Shibh and Tawfiz al Atash. Five days later, according to Stephen Hayes, Shakir disappeared. He was arrested in Qatar on September 17, 2001, six days after al Midhar and al Hamzi had slammed American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon, killing 216 people. On his person and in his apartment, authorities discovered papers tying him to the 1993 World Trade Center plot and to "Operation Bojinka," al Qaeda's 1995 plan to simultaneously blow up 12 jets over the Pacific Ocean.

The Czech Republic stands by its claim, rejected by some opponents of the war in Iraq, that in April 2001, 9/11 leader Mohamed Atta met in Prague with Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim an-Ani, an Iraqi diplomat / intelligence agent. An-Ani was expelled two weeks after the suspected meeting with Atta, for his apparently hostile surveillance of Radio Free Europe's Prague headquarters -- from which American broadcasts to Iraq emanate.
Mohammad Atta - Iraq - Prague - Worldpress.org



Saddam paid bonuses of up to $25,000 apiece to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. On March 13, 2002, Reuters reported that Mahmoud Besharat, who was entrusted with dispensing these funds across the West Bank, gratefully said: "You would have to ask President Saddam why he is being so generous. But he is a revolutionary and he wants this distinguished struggle, the intifada, to continue."

According to the State Department's May 21, 2002 "Patterns of Global Terrorism," the Abu Nidal Organization, the Arab Liberation Front, Hamas, the Kurdistan Worker's party, the Mujahedin-e-Khalq Organization, and the Palestinian Liberation Front all operated offices or bases in Saddam's Iraq. The dictator's hospitality toward these mass murderers placed him in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687, which prohibited him from giving safe harbor to or otherwise supporting terrorists.

Coalition forces found, alive and well in Iraq, a number of key terrorists who enjoyed Saddam's hospitality. Among them was Abu Abbas, mastermind of the October 1985 Achille Lauro hijacking and the murder of Leon Klinghoffer, a 69-year-old, wheelchair-bound American Jew whom Abbas's men threw to his death in the Mediterranean Sea. Another terrorist who took refuge in Baathist Iraq was Khala Khadr al-Salahat, accused of designing the bomb that destroyed Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland in December 1988 (killing 270 people). Yet another was the Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal, who resided in Iraq from 1999 to 2002. According to the Beirut office of the Abu Nidal Organization, Nidal had entered Iraq with the full knowledge and assent of the Iraqi authorities.

Coalition troops destroyed at least three terrorist training camps in Iraq, including a base near Baghdad called Salman Pak. This camp featured a passenger-jet fuselage where, according to numerous Iraqi defectors, foreign terrorists were taught how to hijack airliners with utensils.

Special Forces destroy al-Qaida camp cache | Army Times | armytimes.com

The Philippine government expelled Hisham al Hussein, the second secretary at Iraq's Manila embassy, on February 13, 2003. Cell-phone records indicate that the diplomat had spoken with Abu Madja and Hamsiraji Sali, leaders of Abu Sayyaf, just before and just after this al Qaeda-allied Islamic militant group had conducted an attack in Zamboanga City. Those phone records bolster Sali's claim that the Iraqi diplomat had offered these Muslim extremists Baghdad's help with joint missions.

The Al Qaeda Connection, cont. | The Weekly Standard
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Palestinians get Saddam funds


------------------------------------

Not that you care. Let see that dance.....

2073a2c9b191b6df17e7101e575e38aff2cacedaad451bdf5026448920680942.jpg
 
Last edited:
-- and no link to the paper.

Wonder why.


Gee.. a big strong pseudo-intellectual shouldn't have any trouble finding a big bad story from an old Montana newspaper.....apparently you are as stupid as I thought you were.

Gazette opinion: Obama earned the low ratings

Want Daddy to read it for you? Idiot.

Oboy! Another hissyfit. I love these meltdowns. They're like Fukushima without the radiation.

I just had to wonder, Meltie, what kind of news sources you're using that can't even link their own stories. Either gross incompetence or there's something there they don't want the obviously sterling intellects that make up their readership to see.

I can look it up, easily. Already did. But it's not my job. And I have serious doubts about those whose job it is that fail to do it.

I look forward to more entertainment from these oracles of wisdom sources of your'n. Idiot.

Not your job to keep up with things other than what the Daily KO or HuffPo tells you, huh?

You like to believe what is told to you and I bet you never check out stories that you hear from other libs. Hell, one poster here posts the same damn thing in every thread, yet never checks his own statement and keeps lying.

Why don't most liberals ever discuss the details or explain why they believe what they do. Just deny, insult, ask for links, attack the source and then ignore.
 
-- and no link to the paper.

Wonder why.


Gee.. a big strong pseudo-intellectual shouldn't have any trouble finding a big bad story from an old Montana newspaper.....apparently you are as stupid as I thought you were.

Gazette opinion: Obama earned the low ratings

Want Daddy to read it for you? Idiot.

Oboy! Another hissyfit. I love these meltdowns. They're like Fukushima without the radiation.

I just had to wonder, Meltie, what kind of news sources you're using that can't even link their own stories. Either gross incompetence or there's something there they don't want the obviously sterling intellects that make up their readership to see.

I can look it up, easily. Already did. But it's not my job. And I have serious doubts about those whose job it is that fail to do it.

I look forward to more entertainment from these oracles of wisdom sources of your'n. Idiot.



In short - FUCK YOU.
 
Gee.. a big strong pseudo-intellectual shouldn't have any trouble finding a big bad story from an old Montana newspaper.....apparently you are as stupid as I thought you were.

Gazette opinion: Obama earned the low ratings

Want Daddy to read it for you? Idiot.

Oboy! Another hissyfit. I love these meltdowns. They're like Fukushima without the radiation.

I just had to wonder, Meltie, what kind of news sources you're using that can't even link their own stories. Either gross incompetence or there's something there they don't want the obviously sterling intellects that make up their readership to see.

I can look it up, easily. Already did. But it's not my job. And I have serious doubts about those whose job it is that fail to do it.

I look forward to more entertainment from these oracles of wisdom sources of your'n. Idiot.

Not your job to keep up with things other than what the Daily KO or HuffPo tells you, huh?

You like to believe what is told to you and I bet you never check out stories that you hear from other libs. Hell, one poster here posts the same damn thing in every thread, yet never checks his own statement and keeps lying.

Why don't most liberals ever discuss the details or explain why they believe what they do. Just deny, insult, ask for links, attack the source and then ignore.

I didn't post the article that was missing links, did I? Nor did I create a thread out of an article that didn't even bother to link what it was talking about -- did I?

So FUCK NO it's not my job. How the fuck could it be?
48045-sign_duh.gif
 
Gee.. a big strong pseudo-intellectual shouldn't have any trouble finding a big bad story from an old Montana newspaper.....apparently you are as stupid as I thought you were.

Gazette opinion: Obama earned the low ratings

Want Daddy to read it for you? Idiot.

Oboy! Another hissyfit. I love these meltdowns. They're like Fukushima without the radiation.

I just had to wonder, Meltie, what kind of news sources you're using that can't even link their own stories. Either gross incompetence or there's something there they don't want the obviously sterling intellects that make up their readership to see.

I can look it up, easily. Already did. But it's not my job. And I have serious doubts about those whose job it is that fail to do it.

I look forward to more entertainment from these oracles of wisdom sources of your'n. Idiot.



In short - FUCK YOU.

BabyBawling.jpg


Go find a legitimate source next time, dumb shit.
 
So liberals do wish saddam was still in power torturing and murdering people?

Watch now....as we witness the great liberal dance.

I call it the "left wing two step."

They are glad saddam is not around but......

Saddam was contained and was not a threat to anyone

We ended up with over 100,000 dead Iraqis, Saddam would not have killed that many. They are still at war ten years later

It cost us 5000 dead, tens of thousand wounded and 2 trillion dollars that could have been better spent on helping Americans
It seems to me the kurds are free as people in Iowa
 
So liberals do wish saddam was still in power torturing and murdering people?

Watch now....as we witness the great liberal dance.

I call it the "left wing two step."

They are glad saddam is not around but......

Saddam was contained and was not a threat to anyone

We ended up with over 100,000 dead Iraqis, Saddam would not have killed that many. They are still at war ten years later

It cost us 5000 dead, tens of thousand wounded and 2 trillion dollars that could have been better spent on helping Americans
It seems to me the kurds are free as people in Iowa

Liberals have said Bush is as guilty as hitler. They are funny aren't they? They actually think saddam was not killing anyone during his containment even though defectors all let us know that he was indeed torturing and indeed trying to get wmds.

When it comes to the Iraq issue, the left wing two step dance is most noticeable.

They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

Aren't liberals the same ones that said the republicans the ones that gave saddam wmds, and the real reason we knew he had them was because we had the receipts?

What was the long drawn out speech by our favorite hypocritical liar Al Gore about?

Gore criticizes Bush for ignoring Iraq's ties to terrorism




The left wing two step everyone. They stand for nothing. They are on both sides of every issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

In the real world, there are "buts" to almost every issue. There are arguments for and against most issues. If a person chooses to ignore, avoid and minimize arguments contrary to theirs, they run the risk of making poor decisions. To wit:

Saddam was a nasty, torturing, ________, ____________ bastard (pick your words).

He also provided a strategic a powerful military and strategic balance to Iran, and a clear firewall against Al Qaeda.

The two facts can and do exist in the same reality.

Now that he is gone, Iran is far more emboldened, powerful and dangerous; and terrorists of all stripes know that Iraq is an excellent haven for them. Our presence there would not have stopped either.

So, for thousands of lives, limbs and minds, and over a trillion dollars, what did shoving our nose further into the Middle East get us? This. This would not be happening if we never went into Iraq.

Contrary facts exist everywhere. That's just reality.

.
 
They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

In the real world, there are "buts" to almost every issue. There are arguments for and against most issues. If a person chooses to ignore, avoid and minimize arguments contrary to theirs, they run the risk of making poor decisions. To wit:

Saddam was a nasty, torturing, ________, ____________ bastard (pick your words).

He also provided a strategic a powerful military and strategic balance to Iran, and a clear firewall against Al Qaeda.

The two facts can and do exist in the same reality.

Now that he is gone, Iran is far more emboldened, powerful and dangerous; and terrorists of all stripes know that Iraq is an excellent haven for them. Our presence there would not have stopped either.

So, for thousands of lives, limbs and minds, and over a trillion dollars, what did shoving our nose further into the Middle East get us? This. This would not be happening if we never went into Iraq.

Contrary facts exist everywhere. That's just reality.

.

ciaragif7.gif
 
Saddam was contained and was not a threat to anyone

We ended up with over 100,000 dead Iraqis, Saddam would not have killed that many. They are still at war ten years later

It cost us 5000 dead, tens of thousand wounded and 2 trillion dollars that could have been better spent on helping Americans
It seems to me the kurds are free as people in Iowa

Liberals have said Bush is as guilty as hitler. They are funny aren't they? They actually think saddam was not killing anyone during his containment even though defectors all let us know that he was indeed torturing and indeed trying to get wmds.

When it comes to the Iraq issue, the left wing two step dance is most noticeable.

They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

Aren't liberals the same ones that said the republicans the ones that gave saddam wmds, and the real reason we knew he had them was because we had the receipts?

What was the long drawn out speech by our favorite hypocritical liar Al Gore about?

Gore criticizes Bush for ignoring Iraq's ties to terrorism




The left wing two step everyone. They stand for nothing. They are on both sides of every issue.


Gore? Why Gore?

Why don't you post what Obama had to say?

What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income — to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear — I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history

Barack Obama Oct 2 2002
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems to me the kurds are free as people in Iowa

Liberals have said Bush is as guilty as hitler. They are funny aren't they? They actually think saddam was not killing anyone during his containment even though defectors all let us know that he was indeed torturing and indeed trying to get wmds.

When it comes to the Iraq issue, the left wing two step dance is most noticeable.

They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

Aren't liberals the same ones that said the republicans the ones that gave saddam wmds, and the real reason we knew he had them was because we had the receipts?

What was the long drawn out speech by our favorite hypocritical liar Al Gore about?

Gore criticizes Bush for ignoring Iraq's ties to terrorism




The left wing two step everyone. They stand for nothing. They are on both sides of every issue.


Gore? Why Gore?

Why don't you post what Obama had to say?

What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income — to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear — I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history

Barack Obama Oct 2 2002


Is this your little way in saying you are not going to vote for Hillary and you will hold Clinton and the rest of them that propagated the existence of wmds before Booooosh took office?


Let us now watch the left wing.....ELECTRIC SLIDE everyone.

hDF5ACF03
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

In the real world, there are "buts" to almost every issue. There are arguments for and against most issues. If a person chooses to ignore, avoid and minimize arguments contrary to theirs, they run the risk of making poor decisions. To wit:

Saddam was a nasty, torturing, ________, ____________ bastard (pick your words).

He also provided a strategic a powerful military and strategic balance to Iran, and a clear firewall against Al Qaeda.

The two facts can and do exist in the same reality.

Now that he is gone, Iran is far more emboldened, powerful and dangerous; and terrorists of all stripes know that Iraq is an excellent haven for them. Our presence there would not have stopped either.

So, for thousands of lives, limbs and minds, and over a trillion dollars, what did shoving our nose further into the Middle East get us? This. This would not be happening if we never went into Iraq.

Contrary facts exist everywhere. That's just reality.

.

ciaragif7.gif


I don't know what this response means.

.
 
Liberals have said Bush is as guilty as hitler. They are funny aren't they? They actually think saddam was not killing anyone during his containment even though defectors all let us know that he was indeed torturing and indeed trying to get wmds.

When it comes to the Iraq issue, the left wing two step dance is most noticeable.

They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

Aren't liberals the same ones that said the republicans the ones that gave saddam wmds, and the real reason we knew he had them was because we had the receipts?

What was the long drawn out speech by our favorite hypocritical liar Al Gore about?

Gore criticizes Bush for ignoring Iraq's ties to terrorism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64


The left wing two step everyone. They stand for nothing. They are on both sides of every issue.

Gore? Why Gore?

Why don't you post what Obama had to say?

What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other armchair, weekend warriors in this administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income — to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. That's what I'm opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics. Now let me be clear — I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity. He's a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history

Barack Obama Oct 2 2002

Is this your little way in saying you are not going to vote for Hillary and you will hold Clinton and the rest of them that propagated the existence of wmds before Booooosh took office?


Let us now watch the left wing.....ELECTRIC SLIDE everyone.

hDF5ACF03

Hillary's vote on Iraq cost her the presidency

Hillary admitted she was wrong, how many of the 99% of Republicans admit that they fucked up?

Should we elect someone who see's the error of her previous decision or a Republican who wants to double down on stupid?
 
Last edited:
In the real world, there are "buts" to almost every issue. There are arguments for and against most issues. If a person chooses to ignore, avoid and minimize arguments contrary to theirs, they run the risk of making poor decisions. To wit:

Saddam was a nasty, torturing, ________, ____________ bastard (pick your words).

He also provided a strategic a powerful military and strategic balance to Iran, and a clear firewall against Al Qaeda.

The two facts can and do exist in the same reality.

Now that he is gone, Iran is far more emboldened, powerful and dangerous; and terrorists of all stripes know that Iraq is an excellent haven for them. Our presence there would not have stopped either.

So, for thousands of lives, limbs and minds, and over a trillion dollars, what did shoving our nose further into the Middle East get us? This. This would not be happening if we never went into Iraq.

Contrary facts exist everywhere. That's just reality.

.

ciaragif7.gif


I don't know what this response means.


.


That "response" is what passes for intelligent comment when a right wing hack has been presented with a statement they don't like or agree with.

But I think a fellow right winger has insulted you Mac. Dance dude dance.

BTW Mac. I have read what you have written about Iraq. And agree with you. Most of us in the left or center agree with you.

Does this mean there is hope for party reconciliation? Not a chance.
 
In the real world, there are "buts" to almost every issue. There are arguments for and against most issues. If a person chooses to ignore, avoid and minimize arguments contrary to theirs, they run the risk of making poor decisions. To wit:

Saddam was a nasty, torturing, ________, ____________ bastard (pick your words).

He also provided a strategic a powerful military and strategic balance to Iran, and a clear firewall against Al Qaeda.

The two facts can and do exist in the same reality.

Now that he is gone, Iran is far more emboldened, powerful and dangerous; and terrorists of all stripes know that Iraq is an excellent haven for them. Our presence there would not have stopped either.

So, for thousands of lives, limbs and minds, and over a trillion dollars, what did shoving our nose further into the Middle East get us? This. This would not be happening if we never went into Iraq.

Contrary facts exist everywhere. That's just reality.

.

ciaragif7.gif


I don't know what this response means.


No one does. Consider the source.
 
Saddam was contained and was not a threat to anyone

We ended up with over 100,000 dead Iraqis, Saddam would not have killed that many. They are still at war ten years later

It cost us 5000 dead, tens of thousand wounded and 2 trillion dollars that could have been better spent on helping Americans
It seems to me the kurds are free as people in Iowa

Liberals have said Bush is as guilty as hitler. They are funny aren't they? They actually think saddam was not killing anyone during his containment even though defectors all let us know that he was indeed torturing and indeed trying to get wmds.

When it comes to the Iraq issue, the left wing two step dance is most noticeable.

They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

Aren't liberals the same ones that said the republicans the ones that gave saddam wmds, and the real reason we knew he had them was because we had the receipts?

What was the long drawn out speech by our favorite hypocritical liar Al Gore about?

Gore criticizes Bush for ignoring Iraq's ties to terrorism




The left wing two step everyone. They stand for nothing. They are on both sides of every issue.


So your synapse is so starved of thought that you think the only alternative to Bush was Gore?

And even worse, you think Gore was "left wing"? :rofl:

Ah, kids....

Nice strawman leadoff batter btw. Gullible's Travels.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems to me the kurds are free as people in Iowa

Liberals have said Bush is as guilty as hitler. They are funny aren't they? They actually think saddam was not killing anyone during his containment even though defectors all let us know that he was indeed torturing and indeed trying to get wmds.

When it comes to the Iraq issue, the left wing two step dance is most noticeable.

They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

Aren't liberals the same ones that said the republicans the ones that gave saddam wmds, and the real reason we knew he had them was because we had the receipts?

What was the long drawn out speech by our favorite hypocritical liar Al Gore about?

Gore criticizes Bush for ignoring Iraq's ties to terrorism




The left wing two step everyone. They stand for nothing. They are on both sides of every issue.


So your synapse is so starved of thought that you think the only alternative to Bush was Gore?

And even worse, you think Gore was "left wing"? :rofl:

Ah, kids....

Nice strawman leadoff batter btw. Gullible's Travels.


Aaaaaand pogo noses ahead of rightwinger as the stupidest poster on the board.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Liberals have said Bush is as guilty as hitler. They are funny aren't they? They actually think saddam was not killing anyone during his containment even though defectors all let us know that he was indeed torturing and indeed trying to get wmds.

When it comes to the Iraq issue, the left wing two step dance is most noticeable.

They hate saddam but........

They are on the side of poor, oppressed and tortured, but......

They are glad saddam is gone but.....

Aren't liberals the same ones that said the republicans the ones that gave saddam wmds, and the real reason we knew he had them was because we had the receipts?

What was the long drawn out speech by our favorite hypocritical liar Al Gore about?

Gore criticizes Bush for ignoring Iraq's ties to terrorism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64


The left wing two step everyone. They stand for nothing. They are on both sides of every issue.

So your synapse is so starved of thought that you think the only alternative to Bush was Gore?

And even worse, you think Gore was "left wing"? :rofl:

Ah, kids....

Nice strawman leadoff batter btw. Gullible's Travels.

Aaaaaand pogo noses ahead of rightwinger as the stupidest poster on the board.


Indeed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top