We need to drop the colorization of 'Nationalist'.

Because the White Nationalist are Racist, claiming nationalism as cover. Even Tuberville in Georgia recognizes and admits it. White Nationalist racists are part of our problems not our solutions. Taking the word "white" out of white nationalist does not change them. If they think they stand out as a negative image, maybe they should change, instead of wishing people did not recognize them as what they are.
They know the distinction. They just don't want to admit it. So they try a little reductio ad absurdum to deflect and dilute.

Plus, while obviously a positive, "nationalism" exists along a continuum, where it can become blind, simplistic and binary. I don't think they really understand the "along a continuum" concept, so everything has to be all or nothing.

The fact that they're trying this is instructional, though.
 
Last edited:
Because the White Nationalist are Racist, claiming nationalism as cover.
Of course there are some prominent figures where that seems true . But to generalise from a few examples , or, even organisations , is invalid and probably dangerous . The arguments for Nationalism as a good and useful phenomenon are as per the OP , imo . But of course this can be badly abused , which is when your perspective must be taken account of . imo.
 
"Nationalism" stands on it's own. It means you love your country. Period. Democrats have usurped Nationalism and colorized it for their political purposes. It's a 2 fer. They create another Racist smear label that they can throw around. But more insidiously, Democrats HATE Nationalism. They want to tear down this country which is why they wrecked the border, why they attack and demonize law enforcement and do everything they can to divide the people.
"They have to divide! Divide! Duke called(& U R now calling it too!) the shot & his statement is correct in my opinion. Global humanity has been following a 'dream' of unified mankind living together in harmony since the first human society, & that dream could work 'IF' not for the current state of the 'human condition(human nature). Nationalism is a threat to the folks who promote 'one people, one world & one leader' globalism. Tragically folks that harbor the religion of one world globalism lack the capability for the most part to use critical thinking to evaluate the history of mankind, so they can visualize the reality of what a one world dictatorship in the future would lead to.

"One can lead a horse to water but one cannot make the horse drink."
 
Nationalism is a good thing. It means that you strongly identify with your country and you strongly support your country's interests over the interest of other countries. So what is the problem with that?
I think you are describing "patriotism" rather than "nationalism". I've noticed that many folks use the terms interchangeably as if they are synonymous, but they are not. There is a difference.
 
Democrats I know didn't get the memo, that they are supposed to hate their country. Of course, I don't hang around with people that don't love their country and am not the type those who do hate the country are likely to hang around with, either, so there is that.
But you are judging all nationalists as being racist the way people judge all democrats as hating their country.
 
Because the White Nationalist are Racist, claiming nationalism as cover. Even Tuberville in Georgia recognizes and admits it. White Nationalist racists are part of our problems not our solutions. Taking the word "white" out of white nationalist does not change them. If they think they stand out as a negative image, maybe they should change, instead of wishing people did not recognize them as what they are.
The reason the DNC and the media attaches racism with nationalism is because they need to demonize them, and they can't figure out how to do that if the nationalists are presented as putting their country first by representing their voters the way they are supposed to represent them.
 
Nah. . . I disagree.

PATRIOTISM is a good thing.

Nationalism is toxic, and it pits our nation, or different In-groups, against "the other."

As far as international politics is concerned? I do believe we should strive toward less foreign adventurism, and support for a more equitable, multi-polar world, instead of having the US taxpayer fund the Crown and the US billionaires Anglo-American / Uni-polar world order plans. (Even the French and Germans are starting to get sick of our shit, TBH.) We have been listening to these same CFR and RIIA, Bilderburg, WEF, EU, NATO psychopaths, that keep us in these forever wars now, for the past fifty years.

It has only cost the global population, millions of lives, and the US tax payer trillions of dollars, and for what?

:dunno:

View attachment 803752
The interests of the elite will always come first.

Now their interests lie in destroying borders and a one world government as where in the past their interest lied in nationalism.
 
But you are judging all nationalists as being racist the way people judge all democrats as hating their country.

Come to think of it, the term "white nationalist" is a racial slur against black folks. It implies that black people can't also be proud of their country.
 
Come to think of it, the term "white nationalist" is a racial slur against black folks. It implies that black people can't also be proud of their country.
Just the appearance of an American flag makes them uneasy and view it like they would a Confederate flag.
 
Just the appearance of an American flag makes them uneasy and view it like they would a Confederate flag.

The liberal ones, for sure. But I suspect there are some black folks who conservatives and proud of their country. You just don't see them on here very much.
 
The liberal ones, for sure. But I suspect there are some black folks who conservatives and proud of their country. You just don't see them on here very much.
Yes, if a Black is conservative that automatically makes them the black face of white supremacy

You have to understand how the DNC cult thinks.
 
Nationalism is a good thing. It means that you strongly identify with your country and you strongly support your country's interests over the interest of other countries. So what is the problem with that? The term should not have a skin color associated with it. America has Nationalists of every race, color and creed. What do you think? Why can't we just say "Nationalist"?
Nationalism is not the same as patriotism. Look at the nationalists of the 20th century.. Like Hitler, Mussolini, Franco. Zionism is Nationalism.
 
Yes, if a Black is conservative that automatically makes them the black face of white supremacy

You have to understand how the DNC cult thinks.

Fer sure. Look what they've done to Clarence Thomas, he's been completely erased on Google.

Do a Google search for "black supreme court justice" and see what you get. JuUst about every hit Google returns is about that dumb bitch who can't even define the word "woman."

black supreme court justice - Google Search
 
Nationalism is not the same as patriotism. Look at the nationalists of the 20th century.. Like Hitler, Mussolini, Franco. Zionism is Nationalism.
You think men like Hitler had the best interest of the country at heart?


:auiqs.jpg:

Hitler was a globalist like what we have now. It was all or nothing.

Hitler was your cookie cutter socialist fruitcake
 
Gamel Abdul Nasser was a nationalist. Trump says he's a nationalist, but he doesn't know what it means. Hitler wasn't a globalist. He was a nationalist.
 
Nationalism is not the same as patriotism. Look at the nationalists of the 20th century.. Like Hitler, Mussolini, Franco. Zionism is Nationalism.

So what's wrong with that? Nationalism is the identification with one's own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.

Why should I give a flying fuck about other countries? Do you think the world is one big picnic where everyone sits around a campfire sharing Cokes, making Smores, and singing "Kumbaya"?

If that was the case, then why do countries have borders? I'll tell you why: It's not to keep everyone in, it's to keep others out.
 
So what's wrong with that? Nationalism is the identification with one's own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.

Why should I give a flying fuck about other countries? Do you think the world is one big picnic where everyone sits around a campfire sharing Cokes, making Smores, and singing "Kumbaya"?

If that was the case, then why do countries have borders? I'll tell you why: It's not to keep everyone in, it's to keep others out.
You're hysterical again. Patriots have borders. The Bible has something to say about moving border stones.
 
Nationalism is always racist and authoritarian.
And socialism never is.

Meanwhile, Hitler called himself a national Socialist.

You Left wingers you can change the meaning of terms at the drop of the hat to suit your political whims

Get bent.
 

Forum List

Back
Top